Abstract:Background: The value of community-based cancer research has long been recognized. In addition to the National Cancer Institute's Community Clinical and Minority-Based Oncology Programs established in 1983, and 1991 respectively, the National Cancer Institute established the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program in 2007 with an aim of enhancing access to high-quality cancer care and clinical research in the community setting where most cancer patients receive their treatment. This article discusses strategies utilized by the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program to build research capacity and create a more entrenched culture of research at the community hospitals participating in the program over a 7-year period. Methods: To facilitate development of a research culture at the community hospitals, the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program required leadership or chief executive officer engagement; utilized a collaborative learning structure where best practices, successes, and challenges could be shared; promoted site-to-site mentoring to foster faster learning within and between sites; required research program assessments that spanned clinical trial portfolio, accrual barriers, and outreach; increased identification and use of metrics; and, finally, encouraged research team engagement across hospital departments (navigation, multidisciplinary care, pathology, and disparities) to replace the traditionally siloed approach to clinical trials. Limitations: The health-care environment is rapidly changing while complexity in research increases. Successful research efforts are impacted by numerous factors (e.g. institutional review board reviews, physician interest, and trial availability). The National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program sites, as program participants, had access to the required resources and support to develop and implement the strategies described. Metrics are an important component yet often challenging to identify and collect. The model requires a strong emphasis on outreach that challenges hospitals to improve and expand their reach, particularly into underrepresented populations and catchment areas. These efforts build on trust and a referral pipeline within the community which take time and significant commitment to establish. Conclusion: The National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program experience provides a relevant model to broadly address creating a culture of research in community hospitals that are increasingly networked via systems and consortiums. The strategies used align well with the National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Accrual Symposium recommendations for patient-/community-, physician-/provider-, and site-/organizational-level approaches to clinical trials; they helped sites achieve organizational culture shifts that enhanced their cancer research programs. The National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program hospitals reported that the strategies were challenging to implement yet proved valuable as they provided useful metrics for programmatic assessment, planning, reporting, and growth. While focused on oncology trials, these concepts may be useful within other disease-focused research as well.

Strengthening research capacity in LMICs to address the global NCD burden

Training and Capacity Building in LMIC for Research in Heart and Lung Diseases: the NHLBI—UnitedHealth Global Health Centers of Excellence Program

Systemic Solutions for Addressing Non-Communicable Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Bridging the "Know-Do" Gaps in Five Non-Communicable Diseases Using a Common Framework Driven by Implementation Science

Building Equitable Neuroscience Research Collaborations in Resource-limited Settings

Building Research Capacity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Pandemic Preparedness: Lessons Learned and Future Directions

An analysis of policy and funding priorities of global actors regarding noncommunicable disease in low- and middle-income countries

Revamping of Chronic Respiratory Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

African-led health research and capacity building- is it working?

Impact of using a broad-based multi-institutional approach to build capacity for non-communicable disease research in Thailand

Addressing emerging public health threats: the Noncommunicable Disease Capacity Assessment and Planning (N-CAP) Process

Developing an organizational capacity assessment tool and capacity-building package for the National Center for Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases in Iran

Exploring the potential for using results-based financing to address non-communicable diseases in low- and middle-income countries

Sustaining capacity building and evidence-based NCD intervention implementation: Perspectives from the GRIT consortium

Creating a "culture of research" in a community hospital: Strategies and tools from the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program

Implementation research on noncommunicable disease prevention and control interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

Evolving academic and research partnerships in global health: a capacity-building partnership to assess primary healthcare in the Philippines

The policy agenda for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases

Increasing Effectiveness and Equity in Strengthening Health Research Capacity Using Data and Metrics: Recent Advances of the ESSENCE Mechanism

The Global Alliance for Chronic Diseases Supports 15 Major Studies in Hypertension Prevention and Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Identifying key factors for successful formulation and implementation of healthcare policies on non-communicable diseases: a multinational analysis