Review: methadone increases retention and reduces heroin use compared with non-pharmacological maintenance

Sanju George
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmh.13.1.26
2010-02-01
Evidence-Based Mental Health
Abstract:ED FROM Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, et al. Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD002209. Correspondence to: Richard P Mattick, National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; R.Mattick@unsw.edu.au Sources of funding: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, Australia. A table is published online only at http://ebmh.bmj.com/content/vol13/issue1 Opioid dependence is a major health and social problem worldwide that often is a chronic relapsing disorder. Heroin is the most commonly misused opioid in the UK and heroin addiction has wide ranging adverse consequences for the individual, family and society. Recent estimates are that at least 200 000 people (likely to be an underestimate) misuse heroin in the UK, and the health and social costs to the economy is in the billions. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is undoubtedly the best researched and most widely provided treatment for heroin addiction. The socio-political climate in the UK for a review of the evidence base for MMT, at a time of public sector disinvestment, is opportune and should benefi t all key stakeholders: clinicians offering this treatment; commissioners investing in this treatment; academics trying to fi ll gaps in evidence; and, above all, patients and their families. This review set out to evaluate the effectiveness of MMT, included 11 randomised trials with a total of 1969 participants and concluded that MMT was an effective treatment for heroin dependence: it successfully retained patients in treatment and reduced heroin use but failed to show statistically signifi cant reductions in crime and mortality. Shortcomings of a small sample and no UK based research do not limit the validity or generalisability of this review’s fi ndings. One needs to view this review’s fi ndings in the context of other existing evidence in the fi eld—that is, MMT (in observational studies) has been shown to reduce crime, mortality and transmission of HIV. Systematic reviews have found MMT and buprenorphine MT to be effective; hence both treatments are endorsed by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.1 Although not directly the subject of this review, two underpinning conceptual issues deserve mention when discussing MMT, and ought to guide the clinician. Firstly, MMT should always be offered as part of a comprehensive psychosocial treatment programme, given the unequivocal evidence to support its superiority over MMT alone. Secondly, many treatment providers overemphasise the harm reduction/maintenance aspects of treating heroin addiction to the exclusion of abstinence and recovery models. These two are not opposing and/or mutually exclusive treatment paradigms but are best conceptualised as part of a continuum of care. Sanju George, MRCPsych Consultant and Senior Research Fellow in Addiction Psychiatry, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK Competing interests: None 1. NICE. Methadone and buprenorphine for the management of opioid dependence. TAG114. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2007. CO M M EN TA RY 22_EBMH1018.indd 26 1/20/2010 7:26:15 PM
What problem does this paper attempt to address?