Abstract:Spatial location of an object can be represented in the human brain based on allocentric and egocentric reference frames. The perception/action hypothesis of the ventral and dorsal visual streams proposed that egocentric representations are readily encoded in the dorsal stream as sensorimotor representations, and allocentric representations are encoded in the ventral stream as perceptual representations. In addition, the dorsal visual stream, which transforms visual information into sensorimotor representations is implicated in near-space processing, and the ventral stream, which transforms visual information into perceptual representations is involved in the conscious perception of objects in far space. It has been well documented that how the spatial domain and spatial reference frame works, separately. However, it remains poorly understood how the spatial domain interacts with spatial reference frame, especially for the deaf populations. In present study, we synchronously operated different spatial domains (near vs. far) and different spatial reference frames (egocentric vs. allocentric) to investigate the potential interactions in deaf and hearing populations. By asking 17 congenitally deaf participants and 17 hearing participants to perform allocentric and egocentric judgment tasks on the same stimulus set in near and far spaces, respectively, forming a 2 by 2 factorial design in Experiment 1. The stimuli in each trial contained two 3-D objects: a fork on the top of a round orange plate. In near space, stimuli were presented on a screen with the eye-to-screen distance as 50 cm, and in far space, stimuli were presented via a projector on a screen with the eye-to-screen distance as 226 cm. Retinotopic sizes of the objects and visual angles of the egocentric and allocentric distances were both matched for near and far spaces. To test the sense of balance was impaired in the deaf group of the present experiment, we asked both groups to perform a open loop pointing test in Experiment 2. The main results showed that there were different interaction patterns between deaf and hearing participants. The interaction between spatial domain and spatial reference frame was significant in deaf participants. RTs to targets in allocentric judgment tasks were significantly longer than RTs to targets in egocentric judgment tasks when targets appeared in the far space,t(16) = 2.13,p< 0.05,d= 0.75, and in the near space,t(16) = 3.93,p =0.001,d= 1.38. The interaction between spatial domain and spatial reference frame was also significant in hearing participants. RTs to targets in allocentric judgment tasks were significantly shorter than RTs to targets in egocentric judgment tasks when targets appeared in the far space,t(16) = 3.64,p< 0.005,d= 0.64. However, there was no significant interaction between spatial domain and spatial reference frame when targets appeared in the near space,t(16) = 1.55,p >0.05. In addition, the results of Experiment 2 indicated that the difference between deaf and hearing participants was not due to the sense of balance was impaired in the deaf participants. We concluded that the interaction between spatial domain and spatial reference frame was altered after early deafness, resulting in generating the different interaction patterns between deaf and hearing participants.

The interaction of the visuo-spatial and the vestibular system depends on sensory experience in development

Long-term Deficits in Motion Detection Thresholds and Spike Count Variability after Unilateral Vestibular Lesion

Understanding Language, Hearing Status, and Visual-Spatial Skills

The influence of a vestibular dysfunction on the motor development of hearing-impaired children

Vestibular contribution to spatial encoding

Utricular Dysfunction and Hearing Impairment Affect Spatial Navigation in Community-dwelling Healthy Adults: Analysis from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging

The causal role of vision in the development of spatial coordinates: Evidence from visually impaired children.

Sport as a Factor in Improving Visual Spatial Cognitive Deficits in Patients with Hearing Loss and Chronic Vestibular Deficit

Neuroplasticity of sign language: Implications from structural and functional brain imaging

Auditory perception and the control of spatially coordinated action of deaf and hearing children

Unilateral vestibular deafferentation impairs embodied spatial cognition

Vestibular Deficits in Deafness: Clinical Presentation, Animal Modeling, and Treatment Solutions

Vestibular and balance function is often impaired in children with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss

Effects of acute vestibular lesions on visual orientation and spatial memory, shown for the visual straight ahead

The influence of early visual deprivation on audio-spatial working memory.

Interaction Between Allocentric and Egocentric Reference Frames in Deaf and Hearing Populations

Interaction Between Spatial Domain And Spatial Reference Frame In Deaf And Hearing Populations

Neuroanatomical differences in visual, motor, and language cortices between congenitally deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing non-signers

Verbal and visual serial-order memory in deaf signers and hearing nonsigners: A systematic review and meta-analysis

How Auditory Experience Differentially Influences the Function of Left and Right Superior Temporal Cortices

Deaf Individuals Who Report Having Good Balance Function Present with Significant Vestibular Deficits