Status of insecticide resistance in Sogatella furcifera (Horváth)(Hemiptera: Delphacidae) from Guizhou Province
Jianxue JIN,Daochao JIN,Wenhong LI,Ying CHENG,Fengliang LI,Yuhang ZHOU,Yiling ZENG,Li LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7685/jnau.201606010
2017-01-01
Abstract:[Objectives] In order to understand the insecticide resistance situation and resistance difference in different geographical populations,moreover,to provide necessary knowledge for rational application of insecticides and effective control of Sogatella furcifera (Horváth),the resistance levels to 7 traditional insecticides (chlorpyrifos,isoprocarb,pymetrozine,buprofezin,imidacloprid,thiamethoxam and nitenpyram) were evaluated in 8 populations (Yuping,Qianxi,Pingtang,Bozhou,Pingba,Huaxi,Wuchuan and Xingren)of S.furcifera collected from paddy fields across Guizhou.[Methods] Adults or nymphs were collected from paddy fields and reared for one generation in laboratory,and the third-instar nymphs were used for bioassays.By the rice-stem dipping method,the concentration-responses of S.furcifera to different insecticides were measured and compared with the corresponding relative susceptibility baseline.[Results]The resistance ratios(RRs) of S.furcifera collected from Xingren,Yuping,Pingba,Wuchuan and Bozhou against buprofezin were 167.6-,128.7-,123.6-,93.5-and 53.9-fold respectively and the resistances reached to a high level,while at moderate level from Huaxi,P ingtang,Qianxi populations,with RRs 25.0-,17.1-and 11.4-fold respectively.The RRs to pymetrozine from Huaxi,Pingba,Wuchuan,Pingtang were 84.7-,78.4-,68.9-and 51.0-fold respectively,and reached to a high resistance level,while at a moderate level fromYuping (29.5-),Bozhou (22.6-)and Qianxi (20.8-).By comparing with the relative susceptibility baseline of chlorpyrifos,the RR from Xingren was 16.4-fold and the resistances of Pingtang,Huaxi,Yuping and Bozhou had developed a moderate level,15.9-,12.8-,12.3-and 10.6-fold,respectively.And the RR of S.furcifera collected from Qianxi,Pingba and Wuchuan were less than 10-fold.For imidacloprid,the RR from Wuchuan was 30.0-fold,followed by Pingtang(13.0) and Yuping(11.9),and at a moderate resistance level,while the RRs from the other 5 populations were lower than 5-fold and the susceptibility showed a decreasing trend.The LC50 value of isoprocarb had no significant change and the resistances of S.furcifera from all of 8 field populations still kept at a susceptibility level,and their RRs were less than 3-fold.The RRs of S.furcifera against thiamethoxam were 16.3-fold and 5.5-fold in Wuchuan and Pingtang,which was at a low to moderate resistance level.S.furcifera collected from the other 6 populations kept at a susceptibility level to thiamethoxam.The RRs collected from the other 6 populations were lower than 3-fold and kept at a susceptibility level to nitenpyram,except Pingba and Wuchuan,7.9-and 6.6-fold,respectively.Moreover,the LC50 value to nitenpyram of S.furcifera collected from Bozhou (0.254 mg· L-1),Huaxi (0.217 mg· L-1) and Xingren (0.266 mg· L-1) were lower than the susceptibility baseline (0.392 mg· L-1).[Conclusions] In conclusion,most populations of S.furcifera in Guizhou had developed a high level resistance to buprofezin and pymetrozine,and all field populations (100％)were at a moderate level to them.So,the application of buprofezin and pymetrozine(medium to high resistance)to control S.furcifera should be reduced in Guizhou Province.To chlorpyrifos and imidacloprid,the majority of field populations of S.furcifera had developed a low to moderate resistance level,therefore,chlorpyrifos and imidacloprid(low to moderate resistance)may still be used but should be prudently and at reasonable frequency.Isoprocarb,nitenpyram and thiamethoxam(low resistance)would be better choices for effective management of S.furcifera.Rotation with alternative insecticides with different modes of action is recommended in regions where resistances have reached a moderate level.