Osseous cryosurgery and its effect on adjacent pulpal tissues.

L. Pollan,G. O. Kruger,D. Reynolds,E. Mopsik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90383-1

1974-11-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Impact of an e-learning training for interpreting intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring to avoid perinatal asphyxia: A before-after multicenter observational study

Aziz SLAOUI,Cécile CORDIER,Emilie LEFEVRE-MORANE,Véronique TESSIER,François GOFFINET,Camille LERAY,Agnès BOURGEOIS-MOINE,Jeanne SIBIUDE,Anne-Charlotte LAURENT,Elie AZRIA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102736

IF: 2.156

2024-01-26

Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction

Abstract:Introduction Perinatal asphyxia, a condition that results from compromised placental or pulmonary gas exchange during the birth process, is rare but can lead to serious neonatal and long-term consequences. The visual analysis of cardiotocography (CTG) is designed to avoid perinatal asphyxia, but its interpretation can be difficult. Our aim was to test the impact of an e-learning training program for interpreting CTG on the rate of avoidable perinatal asphyxia at term. Method We conducted a retrospective multicenter before-after study comparing two periods, before and after the implementation of e-learning training program from July 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, in CTG interpretation for midwives and obstetricians in five maternity hospitals in the Paris area, France. The training involved theoretical aspects such as fetal physiology and heart rhythm abnormalities, followed by practical exercises using real case studies to enhance skills in interpreting CTG. We included all term births that occurred between the "before" period (July 1 to December 31, 2014) and the "after period (January 1 to June 30, 2017). We excluded multiple pregnancies, antenatal detection of congenital abnormalities, breech births and all scheduled caesarean sections. Perinatal asphyxia cases were analyzed by a pair of experts consisting of midwives and obstetricians, and avoidability of perinatal asphyxia was estimated. The main criterion was the prevalence of avoidable perinatal asphyxia. Results The e-learning program was performed by 83% of the obstetrician-gynecologists and 65% of the midwives working in the delivery rooms of the five centers. The prevalence of perinatal asphyxia was 0.45% (29/7902 births) before the training and 0.54% (35/7722) after. The rate of perinatal asphyxia rated as avoidable was 0.30% of live births before the training and 0.28% after (p = 0.870). The main causes of perinatal asphyxia deemed avoidable were delay in reactions to severe CTG anomalies and errors in the analysis and interpretation of the CTG. These causes did not differ between the two periods. Conclusion One session of e-learning training to analyze CTG was not associated with a reduction in avoidable perinatal asphyxia. Other types of e-learning, repeated and implemented over a longer period should be evaluated.

obstetrics & gynecology
Does a physiology-based interpretation of CTG allow to dispense with second-line methods? A cross-sectional online survey

Manon Marquet,Julie Blanc,Claude D'Ercole,Xavier Carcopino,Florence Bretelle,Antoine Netter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.164145618.83624606/v1

2022-01-06

Abstract:Objective: To determine the influence of a training course in physiology-based interpretation of cardiotocography (CTG) on professional practices. Design: A cross-sectional study. Setting: A national online survey. Population: Fifty-seven French obstetricians Methods: The participants were divided into two groups: the training group (obstetricians who had already participated in a training course in physiology-based interpretation of CTG) and the control group. Ten medical records of patients who had abnormal CTG tracings and underwent a foetal scalp blood sampling (pH) during labour were presented to the participants. They were given three choices: (i) use a second-line method, (ii) continue labour without using a second-line method, or (iii) perform a caesarean section. Main outcome measures: Median number of decisions to use second-line methods. Results: Forty participants were included in the training group and 17 in the control group. The median number of recourses to a second-line method was significantly inferior for the training group (4 [2–6] second-line methods on 10 records) than for the control group (6 [4–7]; p = 0.040). Regarding the 4 records for which a caesarean section was the real outcome, the median number of decisions of continuing labour was significantly superior in the training group than in the control group (1 [0–1] vs. 0 [0–1]; p = 0.032). Conclusions: Participation in a training course in physiology-based interpretation of CTG could be associated with a less frequent use of second-line methods. Additional studies are required to determine whether this change in attitude is safe for the foetal well-being.
Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management

Ana Pinas,Edwin Chandraharan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.022

2016-01-01

Abstract:The use of continuous intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring (EFM) using a cardiotocograph (CTG) was developed to enable obstetricians and midwives to analyse the changes of fetal heart rate during labour so as to institute timely intervention to avoid intrapartum hypoxic-ischaemic injury. Although CTG was initially developed as a screening tool to predict fetal hypoxia, its positive predictive value for intrapartum fetal hypoxia is approximately only 30%. Even though different international classifications have been developed with the aim of defining combinations of features that help predict intrapartum fetal hypoxia, the false-positive rate of the CTG is high (60%). Moreover, there has not been a demonstrable improvement in the rate of cerebral palsy or perinatal deaths since the introduction of CTG into clinical practice approximately 45 years ago. However, there has been a significant increase in intrapartum caesarean section and operative vaginal delivery rates. Unfortunately, existing guidelines employ the visual interpretation of CTG based on 'pattern recognition', which is fraught with inter- and intra-observer variability. Therefore, clinicians need to understand the physiology behind fetal heart rate changes and to respond to them accordingly, instead of purely relying on guidelines for management. It is very likely that such a 'physiology-based' approach would reduce unnecessary operative interventions and improve perinatal outcomes whilst reducing the need for 'additional tests' of fetal well-being.

obstetrics & gynecology
Evaluation and impact of cardiotocography training programmes: a systematic review

C Pehrson,J L Sorensen,I Amer-Wåhlin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03021.x

Abstract:Background: The interpretation and management of cardiotocography (CTG) tracings are often criticised in obstetric malpractice cases. As a consequence, regular CTG training has been recommended, even though little is known about the effect of CTG training. Objectives: To perform a systematic review of the existing literature on studies on CTG training in order to assess educational strategies, evaluation of training programmes, and impact of training programmes. Search strategy: The Medline database was searched to identify studies describing and/or evaluating CTG training programmes. The literature search resulted in 409 citations. Selection criteria: Twenty studies describing and evaluating CTG training programmes were included. There was no restriction on study design. Data collection and analysis: Data regarding study design, study quality, educational strategies used for training in CTG interpretation and decision making, target groups, number of participants, methods used for evaluation, quality of evaluation, level of evaluation and results of training was extracted from 20 articles, and analysed using Kirkpatrick's four-level model for the evaluation of education. Main results: Training was associated with improvements on all Kirkpatrick levels, resulting in increased CTG knowledge and interpretive skills, higher interobserver agreement, better management of intrapartum CTG, and improved quality of care. Computer-based training (CBT) might be less time-consuming than classroom teaching. Clinical skills seem to decrease faster than theoretical knowledge. Author's conclusions: Training can improve CTG competence and clinical practise. Further research on CBT, test-enhanced learning and long-term retention, evaluation of training and impact on clinical outcomes is recommended.
Interobserver Agreement and Reliability of Intrapartum Nonreassuring Cardiotocography and Prediction of Neonatal Acidemia

Zhuyu Li,Yan Wang,Jian Cai,Peizhen Zhao,Hanqing Chen,Haiyan Liu,Lixia Shen,Lian Chen,Shufang Li,Yangyu Zhao,Zilian Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/fm9.0000000000000146

2022-01-01

Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Abstract:Objective::To evaluate the agreement and reliability of intrapartum nonreasurring cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation and prediction of neonatal acidemia by obstetricians working in different centers.Methods::A retrospective cohort study involving two tertiary hospitals (The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Perking University Third Hospital) was conducted between 30 th September 2018 and 1 st April 2019. Six obstetricians from two hospitals with three levels of experience (junior, medium, and senior) reviewed 100 nonreassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings from 1 hour before the onset of abnormalities until delivery. Each reviewer determined the FHR pattern, the baseline, variability, and presence of acceleration, deceleration, sinusoidal pattern, and predicted whether neonatal acidemia and abnormal umbilical arterial pH < 7.1 would occur. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using the proportions of agreement (Pa) and the proportion of specific agreement (Pa for each category). Reliability was evaluated with the kappa statistic (k-Light’s kappa for n raters) and Gwet’s AC1 statistic. Results::Good inter-observer agreement was found in evaluation of most variables (Pa>0.5), with the exception of early deceleration (Pa= 0.39, 95% confidence interval ( CI): 0.36,0.43). Reliability was also good among most variables (AC1 > 0.40), except for acceleration, early deceleration, and prediction of neonatal acidemia (AC1 = 0.17, 0.10, and 0.25, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups, except in the identification of accelerations (Pa = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.83,0.95; Pa= 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41,0.60, and Pa= 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25,0.43 in junior, medium and senior groups, respectively) and the prediction of neonatal acidemia (Pa= 0.52, 0.52, and 0.62 in junior, medium and senior groups, respectively), where agreement was highest and lowest in the junior-level group, respectively. The accuracy and sensitivity of the prediction for umbilical artery pH < 7.1 were similar among the three groups, but the specificity was higher in the senior groups (93.68% vs. 92.53% vs. 98.85% in junior, medium and senior groups, P= 0.015). Conclusion::Although we found a good inter-observer agreement in the evaluation of the most basic CTG features and FHR category statistically, it was insufficient to meet the clinical requirements for "no objection" interpretation for FHR tracings. Further specialized training is needed for standardized interpretation of intrapartum FHR tracings.
Reflecting on the Accomplishments of Health Communication

V. Freimuth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.713841

2012-08-01

Journal of Health Communication

Abstract:
Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment

Rosalie M Grivell,Zarko Alfirevic,Gillian ML Gyte,Declan Devane

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007863.pub4

IF: 8.4

2015-09-12

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Cardiotocography (CTG) is a continuous recording of the fetal heart rate obtained via an ultrasound transducer placed on the mother's abdomen. CTG is widely used in pregnancy as a method of assessing fetal well-being, predominantly in pregnancies with increased risk of complications.OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of antenatal CTG (both traditional and computerised assessments) in improving outcomes for mothers and babies during and after pregnancy.SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (26 June 2015) and reference lists of retrieved studies.SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials that compared traditional antenatal CTG with no CTG or CTG results concealed; computerised CTG with no CTG or CTG results concealed; and computerised CTG with traditional CTG.DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy.MAIN RESULTS: Six studies (involving 2105 women) are included. Overall, the included studies were not of high quality, and only two had both adequate randomisation sequence generation and allocation concealment. All studies that were able to be included enrolled only women at increased risk of complications.Comparison of traditional CTG versus no CTG showed no significant difference identified in perinatal mortality (risk ratio (RR) 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 4.42, 2.3% versus 1.1%, four studies, N = 1627, low quality evidence) or potentially preventable deaths (RR 2.46, 95% CI 0.96 to 6.30, four studies, N = 1627), though the meta-analysis was underpowered to assess this outcome. Similarly, there was no significant difference identified in caesarean sections (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.28, 19.7% versus 18.5%, three trials, N = 1279, low quality evidence). There was also no significant difference identified for secondary outcomes related to Apgar scores less than seven at five minutes (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.88, one trial, N = 396, very low quality evidence); or admission to neonatal special care units or neonatal intensive care units (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.39, two trials, N = 883, low quality evidence), nor in the other secondary outcomes that were assessed.There were no eligible studies that compared computerised CTG with no CTG.Comparison of computerised CTG versus traditional CTG showed a significant reduction in perinatal mortality with computerised CTG (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.88, two studies, 0.9% versus 4.2%, 469 women, moderate quality evidence). However, there was no significant difference identified in potentially preventable deaths (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.29, two studies, N = 469), though the meta-analysis was underpowered to assess this outcome. There was no significant difference identified in caesarean sections (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.24, 63% versus 72%, one study, N = 59, low quality evidence), Apgar scores less than seven at five minutes (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.30 to 5.74, two studies, N = 469, very low quality evidence) or in secondary outcomes.AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear evidence that antenatal CTG improves perinatal outcome, but further studies focusing on the use of computerised CTG in specific populations of women with increased risk of complications are warranted.

medicine, general & internal
DeepCTG® 1.0: an interpretable model to detect fetal hypoxia from cardiotocography data during labor and delivery

Imane Ben M’Barek,Grégoire Jauvion,Juliette Vitrou,Emilia Holmström,Martin Koskas,Pierre-François Ceccaldi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2023.1190441

IF: 3.569

2023-06-15

Frontiers in Pediatrics

Abstract:Introduction: Cardiotocography, which consists in monitoring the fetal heart rate as well as uterine activity, is widely used in clinical practice to assess fetal wellbeing during labor and delivery in order to detect fetal hypoxia and intervene before permanent damage to the fetus. We present DeepCTG® 1.0, a model able to predict fetal acidosis from the cardiotocography signals. Materials and methods: DeepCTG® 1.0 is based on a logistic regression model fed with four features extracted from the last available 30 min segment of cardiotocography signals: the minimum and maximum values of the fetal heart rate baseline, and the area covered by accelerations and decelerations. Those four features have been selected among a larger set of 25 features. The model has been trained and evaluated on three datasets: the open CTU-UHB dataset, the SPaM dataset and a dataset built in hospital Beaujon (Clichy, France). Its performance has been compared with other published models and with nine obstetricians who have annotated the CTU-UHB cases. We have also evaluated the impact of two key factors on the performance of the model: the inclusion of cesareans in the datasets and the length of the cardiotocography segment used to compute the features fed to the model. Results: The AUC of the model is 0.74 on the CTU-UHB and Beaujon datasets, and between 0.77 and 0.87 on the SPaM dataset. It achieves a much lower false positive rate (12% vs. 25%) than the most frequent annotation among the nine obstetricians for the same sensitivity (45%). The performance of the model is slightly lower on the cesarean cases only (AUC = 0.74 vs. 0.76) and feeding the model with shorter CTG segments leads to a significant decrease in its performance (AUC = 0.68 with 10 min segments). Discussion: Although being relatively simple, DeepCTG® 1.0 reaches a good performance: it compares very favorably to clinical practice and performs slightly better than other published models based on similar approaches. It has the important characteristic of being interpretable, as the four features it is based on are known and understood by practitioners. The model could be improved further by integrating maternofetal clinical factors, using more advanced machine learning or deep learning approaches and having a more robust evaluation of the model based on a larger dataset with more pathological cases and covering more maternity centers.

pediatrics
Schistosoma haematobium: analysis of eggshell protein genes and their expression.

L. Bobek,P. LoVerde,D. Rekosh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4894(89)90004-0

IF: 2.132

Experimental Parasitology

Abstract:
Computerized cardiotocography analysis during labor – A state‐of‐the‐art review

Imane Ben M'Barek,Grégoire Jauvion,Pierre‐François Ceccaldi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14498

2022-12-22

Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract:The use of advanced computerized systems based on the latest machine learning techniques, trained on large databases of cardiotocography data, clinical factors and fetal outcomes, has the potential to successfully assist practitioners in the labor ward and to improve neonatal outcomes. Cardiotocography is defined as the recording of fetal heart rate and uterine contractions and is widely used during labor as a screening tool to determine fetal wellbeing. The visual interpretation of the cardiotocography signals by the practitioners, following common guidelines, is subject to a high interobserver variability, and the efficiency of cardiotocography monitoring is still debated. Since the 1990s, researchers and practitioners work on designing reliable computer‐aided systems to assist practitioners in cardiotocography interpretation during labor. Several systems are integrated in the monitoring devices, mostly based on the guidelines, but they have not clearly demonstrated yet their usefulness. In the last decade, the availability of large clinical databases as well as the emergence of machine learning and deep learning methods in healthcare has led to a surge of studies applying those methods to cardiotocography signals analysis. The state‐of‐the‐art systems perform well to detect fetal hypoxia when evaluated on retrospective cohorts, but several challenges remain to be tackled before they can be used in clinical practice. First, the development and sharing of large, open and anonymized multicentric databases of perinatal and cardiotocography data during labor is required to build more accurate systems. Also, the systems must produce interpretable indicators along with the prediction of the risk of fetal hypoxia in order to be appropriated and trusted by practitioners. Finally, common standards should be built and agreed on to evaluate and compare those systems on retrospective cohorts and to validate their use in clinical practice.

obstetrics & gynecology
Cardiotocography in the Prognosis of Perinatal Outcome

Gordana Bogdanovic,Adnan Babovic,Mirzeta Rizvanovic,Dzenita Ljuca,Gordana Grgic,Jadranaka Djuranovic–Milicic,Jadranaka DjuranovicMilicic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2014.68.102-105

2014-01-01

Medical Archives

Abstract:AIM: The objective of the study was to examine whether cardiotocography can (CTG) predict asphyxia of the embryo, manifested as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), and to what extent one can rely on CTG record.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective research was carried out at the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics UKC Tuzla and medical documentation from the history of mothers and newborns was used. The study group consisted of 68 pregnancies and newborns who developed HIE. The control group consisted of 40 pregnancies, which resulted in birth of healthy newborns--without signs of asphyxia. CTG records were analyzed, Apgar score, the ways of finishing delivery.RESULTS: Pathological CTG records (bradycardia 100, tachycardia 180, silent type of curve, late decelerations) were found in 45 (66.17%) cases of the study group in comparison to 11 (27.5%) in the control group. In the study group Apgar score in 5th minute lower than 7 had 17.46% newborns and the highest incidence of the normally finished deliveries. We conclude that cardiotocography is one of the reliable methods of fetal monitoring in pregnancy and delivery, and that pathological CTG record very likely indicates the possible presence of perinatal asphyxia.CONCLUSION: Achieving a low degree of correlation between pathological intrapartum cardiotocography findings and long-term outcome of children can be achieved by rapid and adequate obstetric intervention and the relatively short duration of fetal acidosis, and optimal procedures during intensive care of newborns.
International expert consensus statement on physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG): First revision (2024)

Edwin Chandraharan,Susana Pereira,Tullio Ghi,Anna Gracia Perez-Bonfils,Stefania Fieni,Yan-Ju Jia,Katherine Griffiths,Suganya Sukumaran,Caron Ingram,Katharine Reeves,Mareike Bolten,Katrine Loser,Elena Carreras,Anna Suy,Itziar Garcia-Ruiz,Letizia Galli,Ahmed Zaima

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.034

Abstract:The first international consensus guideline on physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG) produced by 44 CTG experts from 14 countries was published in 2018. This guideline ensured a paradigm shift from classifying CTG by arbitrarily grouping certain features of the fetal heart rate into different "categories", and then, randomly combining them to arrive at an overall classification of CTG traces into "Normal, Suspicious and Pathological" (or Category I, II and III) to a classification which is based on the understanding of fetal pathophysiology. The guideline recommended the recognition of different types of fetal hypoxia, and the determination of features of fetal compensatory responses as well as decompensation to ongoing hypoxic stress on the CTG trace. Since its first publication in 2018, there have been several scientific publications relating physiological interpretation of CTG, especially relating to features indicative of autonomic instability due to hypoxic stress (i.e., the ZigZag pattern), and of fetal inflammation. Moreover, emerging evidence has suggested improvement in maternal and perinatal outcomes in maternity units which had implemented physiological interpretation of CTG. Therefore, the guideline on Physiological Interpretation of CTG has been revised to incorporate new scientific evidence, and the interpretation table has been expanded to include features of chorioamnionitis and relative utero-placental insufficiency of labour (RUPI-L).
[Presence of an acid glycoprotein in psoriasis scales; preliminary report].

G. Weber,O. Braun-falco

1958-07-19

Abstract:
Inter‐ and intraobserver agreement of antenatal cardiotocography assessments by maternity care professionals: A prospective study

Elise M. Neppelenbroek,Olivier W. H. van der Heijden,Henrica C. W. de Vet,Amanda J. J. de Groot,Darie O. A. Daemers,Ank de Jonge,Corine J. M. Verhoeven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15497

2024-03-24

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract:Objective In the Netherlands, antenatal cardiotocography (aCTG) to assess fetal well‐being is performed in obstetrician‐led care. An innovative initiative was started to evaluate whether aCTG for specific indications—reduced fetal movements, external cephalic version, or postdate pregnancy—is feasible in non‐obstetrician‐led care settings by independent primary care midwives. Quality assessment is essential when reorganizing and shifting tasks and responsibilities. Therefore, we aimed to assess the inter‐ and intraobserver agreement for aCTG assessments between and within four professional groups involved in Dutch maternity care regarding the overall classification and assessment of the various components of aCTG. Method This was a prospective study among 47 Dutch primary care midwives, hospital‐based midwives, residents, and obstetricians. Ten aCTG traces were assessed twice at a 1 month interval. To ensure a representative sample, we used two different sets of 10 aCTG traces each. We calculated the degree of agreement using the proportions of agreement. Results The proportions of agreement for interobserver agreement on the classification of aCTG between and within the four professional groups varied from 0.82 to 0.94. The proportions of agreement for each professional group were slightly higher for intraobserver (0.86–0.94) than for interobserver agreement. For the various aCTG components, the proportions of agreement for interobserver agreement varied from 0.64 (presence of contractions) to 0.98 (baseline heart frequency). Conclusion The proportion of agreement levels between and within the maternity care professionals in the classification of aCTG traces among healthy women were comparable. This means that these professional groups are equally well able to classify aCTGs in healthy pregnant women.

obstetrics & gynecology
Surgical management of the hand in Freeman-Sheldon Syndrome.

A. Aydın,B. Ozden,T. Ozkan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000136303.75925.19

2004-09-01

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Abstract:
Machine learning on cardiotocography data to classify fetal outcomes: A scoping review

Farah Francis,Saturnino Luz,Honghan Wu,Sarah J Stock,Rosemary Townsend,Sarah J. Stock

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108220

IF: 7.7

2024-04-01

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Uterine contractions during labour constrict maternal blood flow and oxygen delivery to the developing baby, causing transient hypoxia. While most babies are physiologically adapted to withstand such intrapartum hypoxia, those exposed to severe hypoxia or with poor physiological reserves may experience neurological injury or death during labour. Cardiotocography (CTG) monitoring was developed to identify babies at risk of hypoxia by detecting changes in fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns. CTG monitoring is in widespread use in intrapartum care for the detection of fetal hypoxia, but the clinical utility is limited by a relatively poor positive predictive value (PPV) of an abnormal CTG and significant inter and intra observer variability in CTG interpretation. Clinical risk and human factors may impact the quality of CTG interpretation. Misclassification of CTG traces may lead to both under-treatment (with the risk of fetal injury or death) or over-treatment (which may include unnecessary operative interventions that put both mother and baby at risk of complications). Machine learning (ML) has been applied to this problem since early 2000 and has shown potential to predict fetal hypoxia more accurately than visual interpretation of CTG alone. To consider how these tools might be translated for clinical practice, we conducted a review of ML techniques already applied to CTG classification and identified research gaps requiring investigation in order to progress towards clinical implementation.MATERIALS AND METHOD: We used identified keywords to search databases for relevant publications on PubMed, EMBASE and IEEE Xplore. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Title, abstract and full text were screened according to the inclusion criteria.RESULTS: We included 36 studies that used signal processing and ML techniques to classify CTG. Most studies used an open-access CTG database and predominantly used fetal metabolic acidosis as the benchmark for hypoxia with varying pH levels. Various methods were used to process and extract CTG signals and several ML algorithms were used to classify CTG. We identified significant concerns over the practicality of using varying pH levels as the CTG classification benchmark. Furthermore, studies needed to be more generalised as most used the same database with a low number of subjects for an ML study.CONCLUSION: ML studies demonstrate potential in predicting fetal hypoxia from CTG. However, more diverse datasets, standardisation of hypoxia benchmarks and enhancement of algorithms and features are needed for future clinical implementation.

engineering, biomedical,computer science, interdisciplinary applications,mathematical & computational biology,biology
Optimal duration of cardiotocography assessment using the iPREFACE score to predict fetal acidemia

Ayumu Ito,Eijiro Hayata,Sumito Nagasaki,Hikari Kotaki,Makiko Shimabukuro,Junya Sakuma,Mayumi Takano,Ayako Oji,Toshimitsu Maemura,Masahiko Nakata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17364-z

IF: 4.6

2022-07-31

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Cardiotocography (CTG) applicability to improve fetal outcomes remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the clinically optimal CTG assessment duration using the integrated score index to predict fetal acidemia by intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring (iPREFACE score). This single-center, retrospective observational study included 325 normal full-term singleton vaginal deliveries at the Toho University Omori Medical Center, from September 2018 to March 2019. The iPREFACE(10), iPREFACE(30), and iPREFACE(60) scores were calculated at 10, 30, and 60 min immediately before delivery. The primary outcome was fetal acidemia (umbilical artery blood pH < 7.2). The secondary outcome was the correlation between all iPREFACE scores and the umbilical artery blood pH, base excess (BE), and lactate values. Patients without accurate CTG findings or with failure of umbilical artery blood sampling immediately after birth were excluded, leaving 145 patients in the final analysis. Of these, 16, three, and two had umbilical artery blood pH of < 7.2, < 7.1, and < 7.0, respectively. All iPREFACE scores significantly correlated with umbilical artery blood pH, BE, and lactate values. iPREFACE(30) had the highest predictive capacity for fetal acidemia, suggesting that 30 min immediately before delivery may be a useful scoring time in clinical practice.

multidisciplinary sciences
Randomised trial of cardiotocography alone or with ST waveform analysis for intrapartum monitoring

J. Westgate,M. Harris,J.S.H. Curnow,K.R. Greene

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)90465-f

IF: 202.731

1992-07-01

The Lancet

Abstract:It is possible to record the fetal electrocardiographic waveform (ECG) from the scalp electrode used in labour for detection of fetal heart rate. Animal and observational studies of changes in the ST waveform of the ECG during hypoxia suggest that a combination of heart rate and ST waveform analysis might improve the predictive value of intrapartum monitoring. In a randomised trial, we have studied intervention rates and neonatal outcome for high-risk labours monitored either by conventional cardiotocography (CTG) or by ST waveform analysis plus CTG. 1200 women with pregnancy of at least 34 weeks' gestation were assigned to the groups when the decision to apply a fetal scalp electrode was made. Neonatal outcome was assessed by umbilical-cord blood gas analysis, Apgar scores, resuscitation needed, and postnatal course. All recordings were retrospectively viewed by an observer unaware of clinical details to check adherence to the trial protocol. The addition of ST waveform monitoring to CTG substantially reduced the proportion of deliveries for fetal distress (ST + CTG 27/615 vs CTG 58/606; p less than 0.001). The groups did not differ in rate of operative delivery for other reasons, incidence of asphyxia at birth, or neonatal outcome. Metabolic acidosis and low 5 min Apgar scores were less common in the ST + CTG than the CTG group, but not significantly so. The only case of birth asphyxia in the ST + CTG group was identified by both heart rate and ST changes. The review of recordings showed that the reduction in intervention rate was among cases with CTG patterns classified as normal or intermediate, whereas there was no difference in intervention rates among cases with abnormal recordings. Our findings confirm that ST waveform analysis discriminates CTG changes in labour and that our protocol for interpretation is safe. Further randomised studies are warranted.

medicine, general & internal
Diagnostic capacity and interobserver variability in FIGO, ACOG, NICE and Chandraharan cardiotocographic guidelines to predict neonatal acidemia

Clara Zamora del Pozo,Marta Chóliz Ezquerro,Inmaculada Mejía,Elisa Díaz de Terán Martínez-Berganza,Luis Mariano Esteban,Almudena Rivero Alonso,Berta Castán Larraz,Mercedes Andeyro García,Ricardo Savirón Cornudella

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1986479

2021-10-15

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: Despite its routine use in intrapartum care, the technique of fetal cardiotocography has some limitations. The aim of this study is to analyze the predictive capacity and interobserver agreement in the latest versions of four international cardiotocography guidelines: Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and Chandraharan, used to predict neonatal acidemia.STUDY DESIGN: The last 30 min of 150 cardiotocographic records were analyzed over all the pH ranges and were blindly evaluated by three independent reviewers. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated to assess the predictive capacity of each fetal cardiotocographic guideline. The degree of interobserver agreement was evaluated with the Fleiss Kappa coefficient.RESULTS: Observers found fetal cardiotocography guidelines to have a variable sensitivity and specificity. The Chandraharan classification reached the highest sensitivity (78.79%), while ACOG had the highest specificity (95.73%). On average for the three observers, Chandraharan had the highest discrimination capacity for neonatal acidemia, although this was only moderate (AUC 0.66; 95%CI, 0.55-0.77) and did not differ significantly from the remaining guidelines. The degree of agreement among the three observers, assessed according to the Fleiss Kappa coefficient, was generally acceptable or moderate for all items and classifications, being highest with the FIGO classification (<i>ĸ</i> = 0.35; 95%CI, 0.28-0.41) and lowest with the ACOG (<i>ĸ</i> = 0.23; 95%CI, 0.16-0.30).CONCLUSION: Although all the guidelines have a moderate capacity to predict neonatal acidemia, the Chandraharan guideline has the highest capacity. This follows a different approach from the others in that it relies on interpretations of cardiotocographic traces based on fetal physiology. The degree of interobserver agreement is, in general, acceptable for the four guidelines, and is the highest for FIGO.
Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement

Niamh Daly,Donal Brennan,Michael Foley,Colm O’Herlihy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.002

2011-11-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To examine the obstetric and perinatal outcomes of women presenting with reduced fetal movement (RFM) during the third trimester, specifically in relation to the diagnostic capacity of non-stress cardiotocography (CTG) used as the primary investigation in this clinical scenario.STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of pregnancy outcomes of all women ≥ 28 weeks' gestation with singleton pregnancies presenting during one calendar year with maternal perception of RFM, all of whom underwent CTG at presentation. Main outcome measures included: obstetric intervention (induction of labour, spontaneous vaginal delivery, operative vaginal delivery, emergency caesarean section), and perinatal outcome (subsequent perinatal death, low Apgar scores (<7(5)), neonatal resuscitation and NICU admission).RESULTS: In all, 524 women presented with RFM and a live fetus, representing 7% of the antenatal obstetric population; 284 women (54%) were nulliparous. The reassuring CTG group comprised 482 (92%) women in whom initial CTG was reassuring and 15 (3%) where a repeat tracing within 1h was reassuring. The non-reassuring/abnormal CTG group (n=27, 5%) either underwent emergency delivery or comprehensive serial fetal assessment; this group had significantly higher rates of emergency caesarean delivery, neonatal resuscitation and NICU admission; the incidence of small-for-gestational-age infants did not differ significantly. No perinatal death occurred in either group following CTG.CONCLUSION: Normal non-stress CTG is a reliable screening indicator of fetal wellbeing in women presenting with perception of RFM in the third trimester; abnormal pregnancy outcomes were more common when initial CTG was abnormal or persistently non-reassuring.

obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology

Osseous cryosurgery and its effect on adjacent pulpal tissues.

Impact of an e-learning training for interpreting intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring to avoid perinatal asphyxia: A before-after multicenter observational study

Does a physiology-based interpretation of CTG allow to dispense with second-line methods? A cross-sectional online survey

Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management

Evaluation and impact of cardiotocography training programmes: a systematic review

Interobserver Agreement and Reliability of Intrapartum Nonreassuring Cardiotocography and Prediction of Neonatal Acidemia

Reflecting on the Accomplishments of Health Communication

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment

DeepCTG® 1.0: an interpretable model to detect fetal hypoxia from cardiotocography data during labor and delivery

Schistosoma haematobium: analysis of eggshell protein genes and their expression.

Computerized cardiotocography analysis during labor – A state‐of‐the‐art review

Cardiotocography in the Prognosis of Perinatal Outcome

International expert consensus statement on physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG): First revision (2024)

[Presence of an acid glycoprotein in psoriasis scales; preliminary report].

Inter‐ and intraobserver agreement of antenatal cardiotocography assessments by maternity care professionals: A prospective study

Surgical management of the hand in Freeman-Sheldon Syndrome.

Machine learning on cardiotocography data to classify fetal outcomes: A scoping review

Optimal duration of cardiotocography assessment using the iPREFACE score to predict fetal acidemia

Randomised trial of cardiotocography alone or with ST waveform analysis for intrapartum monitoring

Diagnostic capacity and interobserver variability in FIGO, ACOG, NICE and Chandraharan cardiotocographic guidelines to predict neonatal acidemia

Cardiotocography as a predictor of fetal outcome in women presenting with reduced fetal movement