Abstract:Objectives: Full-thickness transtendinous supraspinatus tears involve a large portion of the tendon that remains attached to the footprint that often leaves insufficient medial tissue for tension free footprint restoration with traditional suture anchor repair. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes and failure rates for arthroscopic side-to-side suture repair for transtendinous tears to traditional double-row repair for more common tendon avulsions. We hypothesized poorer objective and subjective outcomes as well as higher retear rates for side-to-side suture repair. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 18 consecutive patients with full-thickness transtendinous supraspinatus tears repaired with arthroscopic side-to-side sutures (Group 1) compared to 36 matched controls with classic tendon avulsion from the footprint repaired with double-row knotless transosseous equivalent (TOE) repairs (Group 2). All procedures were performed by a single surgeon with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Demographics and prospectively collected patient reported outcomes (PROs) were collected including postoperative active range of motion (AROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). Failure defined as a symptomatic re-tear diagnosed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or need for revision surgery was also determined. Preoperative tear size and Goutallier stage were recorded from MRIs. Results: There were no significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 regarding mean follow-up (49 months vs. 52.4 months, p = 0.640) and age (68.7 ± 6.8 vs. 67.1 ± 9.6, p = 0.550). With respect to clinical outcomes and PROs, there were no differences in postoperative VAS for pain score (1 ± 1.54 vs 1.5 ± 2.1, p = 0.537), SSV score (92.2 ± 9.1 vs 87.1 ± 10.9, p = 0.086), or ASES score (90.8 ± 9.9 vs 83.1 ± 23.9, p = 0.377). No differences were identified for postoperative AROM forward flexion (153 ± 14 vs 156 ± 16, p= 0.194), external rotation (53 ± 6 vs 51 ± 9, p= 0.498) and internal rotation score (6.4 ± 1.8 vs 7.2 ± 1.2, p=0.244). There was no statistically significant difference in failure rates between cohorts (11.1% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.255). Regarding preoperative tear characteristics, fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus (1.2 ± 1 vs 1.5 ± 0.7, p= 0.307) and anteroposterior tear size were similar (21.3 ± 9.3 vs 24 ± 8, p = 0.322), although lower grades of fatty infiltration in the infraspinatus was present in Group 1 (0.3 ± 0.6 vs 1.1 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Arthroscopic side-to-side suture repair for supraspinatus tears yields excellent outcomes with low failure rates comparable to tendon-to-bone double suture anchor repair for typical avulsion type tears. Retention of the large tendon stump on the greater tuberosity with side-to-side repair also allows restoration of anatomy without undue tension in this uncommon scenario.

Subcapularis tendon tear: A structure-based arthroscopic description

Partial subscapularis tear: State-of-the-art

Lengthening of the subscapularis tendon as a sign of partial tearing in continuity

The prevalence, classification, radiological and arthroscopic findings of intratendinous subscapularis tears

Clinical and Structural Results Following Arthroscopic and Open Repair of Isolated Subscapularis Tears

Ten-year Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation after Repair of Isolated Subscapularis Tears.

Arthroscopic repair for isolated subscapularis tear: successful functional outcomes and high tendon healing rate can be expected nine years after surgery

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Arthroscopic Repair Versus Debridement for Partial Subscapularis Tendon Tears More Than Half of the Entire First Facet

Full-thickness supraspinatus tears are associated with more synovial inflammation and tissue degeneration than partial-thickness tears

Poster 154: Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Side-to-Side Sutures for Full-Thickness Transtendinous Supraspinatus Tears Yields Excellent Outcomes and Low Retear Rates Similar to Traditional Tendon-to-Bone Fixation at Mean Follow Up of 4 Years

Quantitative MRI characterization of arthroscopically verified supraspinatus pathology: comparison of tendon tears, tendinosis and asymptomatic supraspinatus tendons with T2 mapping

Association of Severe Histological Degeneration of the Torn Supraspinatus Tendon and Retear After Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Using the Suture Bridge Technique

Functional and Radiologic Outcomes of Degenerative Versus Traumatic Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears Involving the Supraspinatus Tendon

Coracoid morphology and humeral version as risk factors for subscapularis tears

Effect of Tear Size and Location on Supraspinatus Tendon Strain During Activities of Daily Living and Physiotherapy

Anterior Approach to Retracted Anterosuperior Cuff Tear With Biceps Superior Capsular Reconstruction and Subscapularis Release and Repair With Transosseous Equivalent Double-Row Repair

The Use of the Comma Sign and Tissue for Recognition, Reduction, and Stability During Arthroscopic Repair of Combined Anterosuperior Cuff Tears

Arthroscopic double row partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion bridge repair technique for shoulder: A transtendinous approach

Patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic repair for partial or full-thickness upper third subscapularis tendon tears with open sub-pectoral biceps tenodesis: minimum 10-year outcomes

The Destiny of the Subscapularis Tendon after Arthroscopic Supraspinatus Repair

Correlation analysis of the histological degeneration in a torn supraspinatus tendon with the clinical findings in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair