Optimal Timing of Organs-at-risk-sparing Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Head-and-neck Cancer under Re-planning Resource Constraints
Fatemeh Nosrat,Cem Dede,Lucas B. McCullum,Raul Garcia,Abdallah Sherif Radwan Mohamed,Jacob G. Scott,James E. Bates,Brigid A. McDonald,Kareem A. Wahid,Mohamed A. Naser,Renjie He,Amy C. Moreno,Lisanne V. van Dijk,Kristy K. Brock,Jolien Heukelom,Seyedmohammadhossein Hosseinian,Mehdi Hemmati,Andrew J. Schaefer,Clifton David Fuller,Rice/MD Anderson Center for Operations Research in Cancer (CORC),MD Anderson Head and Neck Cancer Symptom Working Group
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.01.24305163
2024-10-07
Abstract:Objective. The objective of this study was to determine personalized optimal timing for re-planning in adaptive organ-at-risk-sparing radiation therapy under limited re-planning resources in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).
Approach. A novel Markov decision process (MDP) model was developed to determine optimal timing of re-plannings based on the patients expected toxicity, characterized by normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), for four toxicities: xerostomia, dysphagia, parotid gland dysfunction, and feeding tube dependency at 6 months post-treatment. The MDP parameters were derived from a dataset comprising 52 HNC patients treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2007 and 2013. Optimal re-planning strategies were obtained when the permissible number of re-plannings throughout the treatment was limited to 1, 2, and 3.
Main results. Based on the MDP solution, it is optimal to re-plan when the difference between planned and actual NTCPs (ΔNTCP) was greater than or equal to 1%, 2%, 2%, and 4% at treatment fractions 10, 15, 20, and 25, respectively, exhibiting a temporally increasing pattern. The ΔNTCP thresholds remained constant across the number of re-planning allowances (1, 2, and 3). This result underscores the importance of re-planning for patients experiencing the slightest change in ΔNTCP at fraction 10.
Significance. In contrast to prior work that relies on a single re-planning allowance or predetermined time intervals using a one-size-fits-all approach, the MDP model proposed in this paper offers a personalized, resource-aware, and scalable decision-making tool; it identifies optimal dynamic re-planning schedules tailored to individual needs, guided by changes in NTCP.