Real‐world data on efficacy/safety and economic impact of nivolumab administered every 2 and 4 weeks among Japanese patients

Yoshihiko Tasaki,Nanami Ito,Yoshihisa Mimura,Yosuke Sugiyama,Ryo Ogawa,Takaya Shimura,Motoki Nakamura,Daisuke Kawakita,Shuzo Hamamoto,Takehiro Uemura,Keisuke Yokota,Moeko Iida,Kunihiro Odagiri,Yuka Kimura,Yuji Hotta,Hirokazu Komatsu,Katsuhiro Okuda,Akio Niimi,Takahiro Yasui,Shinichi Iwasaki,Akimichi Morita,Hiromi Kataoka,Shuji Takiguchi,Yoko Furukawa‐Hibi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.14073
2024-05-01
Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:The 2/4‐week interval of nivolumab did not differ in efficacy/safety. The 4‐week resulted in decreased medical costs compared with a 2‐week interval of nivolumab. Aim A new treatment interval for nivolumab administration at 480 mg every 4 weeks, in addition to 240 mg every 2 weeks, was approved in Japan in 2020. Using model‐based evaluation, it was speculated that the effects or safety of nivolumab do not differ between the two treatment intervals; however, real‐world data on nivolumab efficacy, safety, and economic impact are lacking. Accordingly, we aimed to examine the effects of nivolumab treatment intervals (2 weeks vs. 4 weeks) in terms of efficacy, safety, and economic impact in Japanese patients with cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 126 patients treated with nivolumab. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received nivolumab at 240 mg every 2 weeks (2‐week group) or 480 mg every 4 weeks (4‐week group). Results Efficacy results found no significant difference between the 4‐ and 2‐week groups considering median overall survival (p = 0.70) and median progression‐free survival (p = 0.57). The incidence of any grade and ≥ grade 3 immune‐related adverse events did not differ between the 4‐week and 2‐week groups (any grade, p = 0.13; ≥ grade 3, p = 0.36). Excluding drug costs, the 4‐week group had significantly lower medical costs than the 2‐week group (2‐week vs. 4‐week: mean, 94,659 JPY [679.0 USD] vs. 58,737 JPY [421.3 USD]; p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?