[A case of recurrent, metastatic Merkel's tumor localized in the gluteal region].

V. Turi,F. D’Abrosca,M. Lucev,E. Gerosa

1990-02-01

Minerva Chirurgica

Abstract:A case of recurrent metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma of the buttock is described and after a short review of the literature some clinical and therapeutic features of this rare tumor are given.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Recreational Cannabis Legalization, Retail Sales, and Adolescent Substance Use Through 2021

Rebekah Levine Coley,Naoka Carey,Claudia Kruzik,Summer Sherburne Hawkins,Christopher F. Baum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0555

2024-04-15

JAMA Pediatrics

Abstract:This cross-sectional study using survey datasets evaluates recreational cannabis legalization and retail sales policies and adolescent substance use through 2021.

pediatrics
Recreational Marijuana Laws and Teen Marijuana Use, 1993-2021

D. Mark Anderson,Hao T. Fe,Yang Liang,Joseph J. Sabia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.0698

2024-04-24

JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract:This cross-sectional study uses data from the Youth Risk Behavior surveys to assess the association of state-level recreational marijuana laws and youth marijuana use.

psychiatry
Prospective, longitudinal study to isolate the impacts of marijuana use on neurocognitive functioning in adolescents

Wen Ren,Diana Fishbein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1048791

2023-05-15

Abstract:Introduction: Policies to legalize possession and use of marijuana have been increasingly supported across the United States. Although there are restrictions on use in minors, many substance abuse scientists anticipate that these policy changes may alter use patterns among adolescents due to its wider availability and a softening of beliefs about its potentially harmful consequences. Despite the possibility that these policies may increase the prevalence of use among adolescents, the effects of marijuana on neurodevelopment remain unclear, clouding arguments in favor of or opposition to these policies. Methods: The present prospective, longitudinal study was designed to isolate the neurodevelopmental consequences of marijuana use from its precursors during adolescence-a period of heightened vulnerability for both substance use and disrupted development due to environmental insults. Early adolescents who were substance-naïve at baseline (N = 529, aged 10-12) were recruited and tracked into adolescence when a subgroup initiated marijuana use during one of three subsequent waves of data collection, approximately 18 months apart. Results: Results suggest that marijuana use may be specifically related to a decline in verbal learning ability in the short term and in emotion recognition, attention, and inhibition in the longer-term. Discussion: These preliminary findings suggest that marijuana use has potential to adversely impact vulnerable neurodevelopmental processes during adolescence. Intensive additional investigation is recommended given that state-level policies regulating marijuana use and possession are rapidly shifting in the absence of good scientific information.
Evolving disparities in cannabis use among youth by demographics, tobacco and alcohol use in the US: 2013-2021

Renee D. Goodwin,Kevin D. Silverman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.01.012

IF: 6.604

2024-01-25

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract:Introduction The current study investigated the prevalence of past 30-day cannabis use among US youth by cigarette use, alcohol use, demographics and state-of-residence cannabis legal status in 2021, and examined whether changes in prevalence were modified by these factors from 2013 to 2021. Methods Data were drawn from the 24 states that collected cannabis use data participating in the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) from 2013-2021. Logistic regression analyses estimated past 30-day cannabis prevalence in 2021 and produced adjusted odds ratios (AOR) by current cigarette, alcohol, state-of-residence cannabis legal status. The same method was used with year as the exposure, adjusting for sex, race and ethnicity, to assess trends in prevalence from 2013 to 2021. Results In 2021, cannabis use was more common among female (16.75% vs. 13.83%, AOR=1.26 (95% CI: 1.16, 1.37)), Non-Hispanic (NH) Black and Hispanic youth relative to NH White youth (17.19%, 16.14% vs. 14.60%; AOR=1.25 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.39); AOR=1.16 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.29)), respectively. Cannabis use was much more common among youth who reported any past 30-day cigarette or alcohol use (44.90% vs. 6.48%, AOR=11.80 (95% CI: 10.57, 13.18)). Declines in cannabis use were observed independent of state-level cannabis law from 2013 to 2021 and cannabis use prevalence did not differ significantly by state-of-residence cannabis legal status among the 24 participating states in 2021. Conclusions Public health officials should carefully consider the potential differential impact of expanding commercialization of cannabis and US state government endorsement of cannabis as a "wellness" product on youth, especially with regard to co-use with tobacco and alcohol. National and state-level public health education on cannabis use and youth-oriented prevention of cannabis uptake are long overdue.

medicine, general & internal,public, environmental & occupational health
Youth Exposure to Recreational Cannabis Legalization: Moderation of Effects by Sex and Parental Cannabis Use during Adolescence

David C. R. KerrStacey S. TiberioJennifer A. BaileyMarina EpsteinKimberly L. HenryDeborah M. Capaldia Oregon Social Learning Center,Eugene,Oregon,USAb Social Development Research Group,School of Social Work,University of Washington,Seattle,Washington,USAc Department of Psychology,Colorado State University,Fort Collins,Colorado,USA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2310495

2024-02-06

Substance Use & Misuse

Abstract:Objective Few studies of recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) have assessed adolescents both before and after RCL or considered moderators of RCL effects. The present study tested whether RCL was more strongly associated with cannabis use for girls and among youth whose parents had a history of cannabis use during adolescence.

psychiatry,substance abuse,psychology
Associations between e-cigarette policies and adolescent use and access to e-cigarettes

Alexandra Pastrana,Christopher F Baum,Summer Sherburne Hawkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100157

2023-04-06

Abstract:Background: Tobacco control policies have been adapted to address rising levels of adolescent e-cigarette use. Despite new restrictions, adolescents are continuing to access e-cigarettes. Methods: We linked 2015-2019 Youth Risk Behavior Survey data on 503,154 14-18-year-olds from 40 states with state-level e-cigarette minimum legal sales age (MLSA) laws, taxes, and smoke-free legislation. Using two-way fixed effects probit regression models, we first examined the associations between these statewide e-cigarette policies and adolescent use and, second, with access to e-cigarettes. We subsequently tested interactions between age and each policy and present average marginal effects as percentage point (pp) changes. Results: While MLSA laws for e-cigarettes were associated with slight increases in e-cigarette use (2.72 pp; 1.29, 4.15), associations were no longer significant after at least 1-year post-implementation. MLSA laws were also associated with decreases in e-cigarette purchases in stores (-9.50 pp; -18.21, -0.79) and increases in acquiring them from someone else (13.26 pp; 4.10, 22.42), particularly among 18-year-olds. E-cigarette taxes were associated with decreases in use (-9.18 pp; -11.63, -6.73), but there were limited associations with e-cigarette access. While smoke-free legislation prohibiting e-cigarettes was associated with slight increases in use (1.87 pp; 0.23, 3.50), after at least 1-year post-implementation, they were associated with decreases in use. Smoke-free legislation was also associated with decreases in purchases in stores by 14-year-olds, but increases in online purchases by 18-year-olds. Conclusion: Understanding the immediate and longer-term consequences of e-cigarette policies is essential to influence adolescent e-cigarette use. Adolescents will continue acquiring e-cigarettes across varying sources if measures are not taken to address access alongside policies aimed at reducing use.
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cannabis Use Following Legalization in US States With Medical Cannabis Laws

Silvia S. Martins,Luis E. Segura,Natalie S. Levy,Pia M. Mauro,Christine M. Mauro,Morgan M. Philbin,Deborah S. Hasin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27002

2021-09-27

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:Importance: Little is known about changes in cannabis use outcomes by race and ethnicity following the enactment of recreational cannabis laws (RCLs).Objectives: To examine the association between enactment of state RCLs and changes in cannabis outcomes by race and ethnicity overall and by age groups in the US.Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used restricted use file data from the National Surveys of Drug Use and Health between 2008 and 2017, which were analyzed between September 2019 and March 2020. National survey data included the entire US population older than 12 years.Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported past-year and past-month cannabis use and, among people that used cannabis, daily past-month cannabis use and past-year Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) cannabis use disorder. Multi-level logistic regressions were fit to estimates changes in cannabis use outcomes by race and ethnicity overall and by age between respondents in states with and without enacted RCLs, controlling for trends in states with medical cannabis laws or no cannabis laws.Results: A total of 838 600 participants were included for analysis (mean age, 43 years [range, 12-105 years]; 434 900 women [weighted percentage, 51.5%]; 511 900 participants (weighted percentage, 64.6%) identified as non-Hispanic White, 99 000 (11.9%) as non-Hispanic Black, 78 400 (15.8%) as Hispanic, and 149 200 (7.6%) as other (including either Native American, Pacific Islander, Asian, or more than 1 race or ethnicity). Compared with the period before RCL enactment, the odds of past-year cannabis use after RCL enactment increased among Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.15-1.52), other (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.12-1.52), and non-Hispanic White (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.31) populations, particularly among those aged 21 years or more. Similarly, the odds of past-month cannabis use increased among Hispanic (aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22-1.69), other (aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20-1.70), and non-Hispanic White (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.13-1.35) populations after RCL enactment. No increases were found in the odds of past-year or past-month cannabis use post-RCL enactment among non-Hispanic Black individuals or among individuals aged 12 to 20 years for all race and ethnicity groups. In addition, among people who used cannabis, while no increases were found in past-month daily cannabis in any racial or ethnic group, the odds of cannabis use disorder increased post-RCL among individuals categorized as other overall (aOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07-1.95), but no increases were found by age group.Conclusions and Relevance: Changes in cannabis use by race and ethnicity that may be attributable to policy enactment and variations in recreational policy provisions should be monitored. To ensure that the enactment of recreational cannabis laws truly contributes to greater equity in outcomes and adheres to antiracist policies, monitoring unintended and intended consequences that may be attributable to recreational cannabis use and similar policies by race and ethnicity is needed.

medicine, general & internal
Why Are Adolescent Cannabis Use Disorder Treatment Admissions Declining in the US? The Mediated Pathway of State Treatment Admissions Rates before and after Recreational Cannabis Legalization

Jeremy Mennis,Gerald J. Stahler,Donna L. Coffman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2310500

2024-02-02

Substance Use & Misuse

Abstract:Purpose : State-level prevalence data are used to investigate whether recreational cannabis legalization moderates the mediated pathway from the perception of low risk of harm, to cannabis use, to cannabis use disorder (CUD) treatment admissions, among adolescents (age 12–17) in the US. Methods : Annual state prevalence measures of perception of low risk, cannabis use, and CUD treatment admissions between 2008 and 2019 ( N = 542 state-year observations) were collected from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) and the Treatment Episode Dataset – Admissions (TEDS-A). A two-way fixed effects (state and year) moderated mediation model was used to test whether recreational legalization moderated the indirect effect of perception of low risk on treatment admissions via cannabis use. Results : A positive indirect effect of perceiving cannabis as low risk on CUD treatment admissions via cannabis use was observed prior to legalization but not afterwards. After legalization, the positive association of perceiving cannabis as low risk with cannabis use was strengthened, and the positive association of cannabis use with treatment admissions was suppressed, as compared to before legalization. Discussion : Recreational legalization may alter the social acceptability and medical self-administration of cannabis, potentially leading to CUD treatment utilization decline among adolescents even as risk factors for CUD increase. Linking recreational cannabis legalization to advancing awareness of the health risks associated with adolescent cannabis use and promoting adolescent CUD treatment engagement through mHealth approaches and primary care providers are key to addressing potential adolescent health challenges brought about by expanding cannabis legalization.

psychiatry,substance abuse,psychology
From high school to higher education: Is recreational marijuana a consumption amenity for US college students?

Ahmed El Fatmaoui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.13225

2024-05-30

Economic Inquiry

Abstract:This paper examines how recreational marijuana legalization (RML) affects first‐time college enrollment in the US using a unique college‐level dataset and various estimation methods such as difference‐in‐differences and event study. I find that RML increases enrollments by approximately up to 9%, without compromising degree completion or graduation rate, and it boosts college competitiveness by offering a positive amenity, as evidenced by the rise in out‐of‐state enrollments relative to neighboring states. In addition, I find no evidence that RML affects college prices, quality, or in‐state enrollment. This effect is stronger for non‐selective public colleges in early‐adopting RML states.

economics
Effect modification of legalizing recreational cannabis use on the association between e-cigarette use and future cannabis use among US adolescents

Zongshuan Duan,Yu Wang,Scott R Weaver,Claire A Spears,Pinpin Zheng,Shannon R Self-Brown,Michael P Eriksen,Jidong Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109260

IF: 4.852

2022-01-01

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract:•Association between youth e-cigarette use and future cannabis use was evaluated.•Effect modification of state recreational cannabis policy was examined.•Baseline e-cigarette use was associated with increased likelihood of cannabis use.•State recreational cannabis law may increase cannabis onset among e-cigarette users.
Cannabis reduction among adolescents as spillover from successful tobacco control

Richard Miech,Steven G Heeringa,Sabrina Molinaro,Elisa Benedetti,Steven G. Heeringa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104315

IF: 5.931

2024-02-01

International Journal of Drug Policy

Abstract:BACKGROUND: National programs that reduce adolescent cannabis use warrant renewed attention in light of current discussions to reform cannabis legislation, including the possibility of legalization for recreational use. This study measures the size of a decrease in a country's prevalence of adolescent cannabis use that accompanies a decrease in its prevalence of adolescents who had ever smoked a cigarette.METHODS: Data are from the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD), which is a collaborative effort of more than 40 European countries to surveil adolescent substance use. This study uses data from the seven survey administrations in 1995, 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, and 2019. The main analysis is a fixed-effect regression analysis of country-level, four-year changes in adolescent lifetime cannabis use prevalence on country-level, four-year changes in adolescent lifetime cigarette use prevalence.RESULTS: Decreases in the national prevalence of adolescents who had ever smoked a cigarette were accompanied by decreases half as large in national prevalence of adolescent lifetime cannabis use.CONCLUSION: For European countries considering the legalization of adult recreational cannabis use, tobacco control can offer a tool to help counter potential increases in cannabis use among adolescents.

substance abuse
Nicotine and Alcohol Use as Predictors of Recreational Cannabis Use in Adolescence: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

T. S. Fingesi,L. J. Kimaru,B. O. Okusanya,J. E. Ehiri,C. Rosales

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2342008

2024-04-25

Substance Use & Misuse

Abstract:Background: The prevalence of recreational cannabis use among adolescents is a growing public health concern due to its link to short- and long-term adverse effects on adolescents' wellbeing, physical health, mental health, and interpersonal behaviors. Method: Five databases were searched from inception to March 17, 2023, for exposure (nicotine product, alcohol) and outcome (recreational cannabis) in adolescents (persons aged 10–19 years). The studies were screened independently by two reviewers, and the quality of the studies was assessed with Newcastle Ottawa and AXIS tool. PRISMA guidelines were employed in this review. Result: Twenty-one (21) studies involving 2,778,406 adolescents were included in the appraisal and heterogeneity was found among these studies. Ascertainment bias was commonly detected in thirteen (13) of the included studies. Among the substances examined as potential exposures, nicotine-product use emerged as a significant factor associated with future cannabis use among adolescents, particularly in mid-adolescence and in places where recreational cannabis use has been legalized. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests an association between nicotine-product use and subsequent recreational cannabis use among adolescents. However, further research is needed to establish causality between exposure to nicotine substances and the use of recreational cannabis within this age demographic. Additionally, there is a need for the development of prevention programs and targeted policies that continuously inform and update this vulnerable sub-population about the risks associated with cannabis use for leisure.

psychiatry,substance abuse,psychology
The Regulatory and Marketing Environment Surrounding the Legalization of Retail Marijuana and the Impact on Youth

Kathleen Kelly,Christopher Berry,Maria Leonora G. Comello,Heather Bowen Ray

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915620911632

2020-05-05

Abstract:This paper explores the intersections of emerging recreational marijuana policy and large-scale contemporary marketing practices. The authors examine the evolution of current policies and the overall regulatory environment related to the legalization and marketing of recreational marijuana in the United States, exploring current and possible effects of marijuana legalization on adolescent uptake. Although the federal government still classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug and prohibits possession and sale of the drug for both medical and recreational purposes, states are moving toward legalization. Implications of legalization are explored from the perspectives of regulation, harm reduction, and risk perception. The authors make recommendations and develop propositions regarding future research needed to evaluate the marketing implications and regulatory efforts aimed at U.S. adolescents.

business
Recreational cannabis legalization and pediatric exposures in Massachusetts, United States

Dias Argandykov,Toby A Raybould,Alice Gervasini,John Hwabejire,Michael R Flaherty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2023-045052

IF: 3.7

2024-01-17

Injury Prevention

Abstract:Introduction In Massachusetts, US, medical cannabis legalisation was associated with increased paediatric cannabis exposure cases, including emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. The impact of recreational cannabis legalisation (RCL) on paediatric exposures in Massachusetts has yet to be studied. Methods To compare the incidences before and after RCL in Massachusetts, US, we queried the data on paediatric cannabis exposure cases in 2016–2021 from the Centre for Healthcare and Analysis and Injury Surveillance Programme at the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The pre-and post-legalisation phases comprised the periods between 2016–2018 and 2019–2021, respectively. Cannabis-related exposure cases included ED visits and hospitalizations among children and young adolescents of 0–19 years old. Results During the 6-year period (2016–2021), 2357 ED visits and 538 hospitalizations related to cannabis exposure among children and teenagers (0–19 years) were reported in Massachusetts. The incidence of ED visits for all age groups increased from 18.5 per 100 000 population before RCL to 31.0 per 100 000 population (incidence rate ratio (IRR), 1.6; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8). Children in the age groups of 0–5 and 6–12 years experienced the highest increase in cannabis-related ED visits. Additionally, the incidence of hospitalisation due to cannabis intoxication substantially increased following RCL (IRR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.8 to 2.7), a 126% increase. Conclusions Cannabis-related ED visits and hospitalizations among children and teenagers increased after recreational cannabis became legal in Massachusetts, US. Further efforts are warranted to prevent the unintentional impact of RCL, especially considering substantial increases in cannabis exposure cases among young children.

public, environmental & occupational health
The association between state cannabis policies and cannabis use among adults and youth, United States, 2002–2019

Seema Choksy Pessar,Rosanna Smart,Tim Naimi,Marlene Lira,Jason Blanchette,Anne Boustead,Rosalie Liccardo Pacula

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16663

2024-09-21

Addiction

Abstract:Aims To measure the association between state cannabis policies and use among adults and youth in the United States from 2002 to 2019, given rapid policy liberalization and complex state cannabis policy environments. Design Repeated cross‐sectional time series analysis. Three sets of models assessed the linear association between the Cannabis Policy Scale (CPS), an aggregate measure of 17 state cannabis policy areas that weights each policy by its efficacy and implementation rating, and prevalence of cannabis use. The first included year and state fixed effects; the second added state‐level controls; the third replaced state fixed effects with state random effects. Standard errors were clustered at the state level in all models. Setting and participants United States. Measurements Past‐month prevalence of cannabis use is from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health Small Area Estimates, a nationally and state‐representative cross‐sectional survey of household population ages 12 and older for years 2002–2003 to 2018–2019. Exposure data include the CPS. Findings A 10 percentage‐point increase in the CPS (i.e. greater cannabis policy restrictiveness) was associated with lower past‐month use prevalence by 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = ‐1.05 to −0.56) to 0.97 (95% CI = ‐1.19 to −0.75) percentage‐points for the population ages 12 years and older. When models were stratified by age, a 10 percentage‐point increase in the CPS was associated with a 0.87 (95% CI = ‐1.13 to −0.61) to 1.04 percentage‐point (95% CI = ‐1.03 to −0.84) reduction in past‐month use prevalence for adults ages 18 years and older, and a 0.17 (95% CI = ‐0.24 to −0.09) to 0.21 percentage‐point (95% CI = ‐0.35 to −0.07) reduction for youth ages 12–17 years. Conclusions More restrictive US cannabis policies appear to be associated with reduced cannabis use for both adults and youth.

psychiatry,substance abuse
Changes of hippocampal protein levels during postnatal brain development in the rat

R. Weitzdorfer,H. Hoeger,A. Pollak,B. Lubec

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2006.09.263

2006-12-01

International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience

Abstract:
Flavoured tobacco product restrictions in Massachusetts associated with reductions in adolescent cigarette and e-cigarette use

Summer Sherburne Hawkins,Claudia Kruzik,Michael O'Brien,Rebekah Levine Coley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056159

IF: 6.953

2021-01-27

Tobacco Control

Abstract:Background In the USA, many states do not pre-empt municipalities from enacting stricter tobacco-control policies than state or federal laws. Several municipalities in Massachusetts have passed progressive local laws aimed at reducing adolescent tobacco use. We exploited this variability to examine the associations between county-level flavoured tobacco product restrictions, tobacco 21 policies and smoke-free laws prohibiting e-cigarettes with adolescent cigarette and e-cigarette use in Massachusetts, and to assess whether policy effects varied by age. Methods We conducted difference-in-differences models to link changes in county-level tobacco-control policies to changes in adolescents’ use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes using 2011–2017 biennial Massachusetts Youth Health Surveys. Results Counties with greater implementation of flavoured tobacco product restrictions were associated with a decrease in the level of cigarette use among users (Coefficient −1.56; 95% CI −2.54 to −0.58). A significant interaction (p=0.03) revealed the largest reductions among 14 and 18 year olds. Increasing flavoured tobacco product restrictions were also associated with reductions in the likelihood of e-cigarette use (Coefficient −0.87; 95% CI −1.68 to −0.06). Increasing tobacco 21 restrictions were associated with decreases in cigarette use only among 18 year olds, while there was no evidence of associations between smoke-free laws with use of either tobacco product. Conclusions Adolescents in Massachusetts decreased their use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes in response to local restrictions that limited the sale of flavoured tobacco products to adult-only retail tobacco stores. Local legislation can reduce adolescent tobacco use and municipalities should enact stricter tobacco-control policies when not pre-empted by state law.

public, environmental & occupational health,substance abuse
US Epidemiology of Cannabis Use and Associated Problems

Deborah S Hasin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2017.198

2017-08-30

Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract:This review provides an overview of the changing US epidemiology of cannabis use and associated problems. Adults and adolescents increasingly view cannabis as harmless, and some can use cannabis without harm. However, potential problems include harms from prenatal exposure and unintentional childhood exposure; decline in educational or occupational functioning after early adolescent use, and in adulthood, impaired driving and vehicle crashes; cannabis use disorders (CUD), cannabis withdrawal, and psychiatric comorbidity. Evidence suggests national increases in cannabis potency, prenatal and unintentional childhood exposure; and in adults, increased use, CUD, cannabis-related emergency room visits, and fatal vehicle crashes. Twenty-nine states have medical marijuana laws (MMLs) and of these, 8 have recreational marijuana laws (RMLs). Many studies indicate that MMLs or their specific provisions did not increase adolescent cannabis use. However, the more limited literature suggests that MMLs have led to increased cannabis potency, unintentional childhood exposures, adult cannabis use, and adult CUD. Ecological-level studies suggest that MMLs have led to substitution of cannabis for opioids, and also possibly for psychiatric medications. Much remains to be determined about cannabis trends and the role of MMLs and RMLs in these trends. The public, health professionals, and policy makers would benefit from education about the risks of cannabis use, the increases in such risks, and the role of marijuana laws in these increases.

pharmacology & pharmacy,neurosciences,psychiatry
Assessing the Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Cannabis Use Disorder and Admissions to Treatment in the United States

Lydia Aletraris,Brian D. Graves,Joyce J. Ndung’u

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-023-00470-x

2023-04-10

Current Addiction Reports

Abstract:Purpose of ReviewPolicy implications from changes in recreational cannabis laws (RCLs) have raised public health concerns. While numerous studies have examined the impact of RCLs on cannabis use, there is less research on the risk of developing cannabis use disorder (CUD). This review summarizes the latest research on the effects of RCLs on CUD prevalence and cannabis treatment admissions.Recent FindingsNine studies were published between 2016 – 2022 that examined RCLs and CUD or treatment. Findings generally indicate an increase in CUD prevalence associated with legalization, but effects differ by age group. There was no significant association between legalization and CUD treatment admissions, and CUD admissions decreased overall during the study periods.SummaryTo improve policy, prevention, and treatment services, policymakers should monitor RCLs’ effects on adverse public health outcomes and researchers should consider the effects on individual and community-level characteristics. We discuss methodological challenges in conducting state-level research and provide suggestions for future studies.
Exposure to Peers' Online Postings about Substances and Adolescents' Substance Use: a Longitudinal Study

Burnell, Kaitlyn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02944-6

2024-11-09

Journal of Child and Family Studies

Abstract:Adolescents may be exposed to online content depicting substance use, raising the question of how exposure to others' online substance use content relates to one's own use. Additionally, it is of interest to explore how parental restrictive (i.e., media content restriction) and active mediation (i.e., media content discussion) may relate to links between online substance use exposure and substance use. In a sample of 1017 U.S. adolescents (55% female; T1 M age = 15.04), this longitudinal study examined links between exposure to peers' online postings about substances and adolescents' own alcohol, marijuana, cigarette, and e-cigarette use two years later. Adolescents' Time 1 exposure to peers' online substance postings was generally associated with greater Time 2 marijuana use, alcohol use, and, to some extent, e-cigarette use. Greater Time 1 cigarette use was associated with lower Time 2 exposure to peers' online substance postings. Time 1 parent-reported restrictive mediation was associated with lower Time 2 exposure to online postings, but mediation did not buffer associations between exposure and use. Intervention and prevention efforts should be geared towards targeting risky content adolescents are exposed to online, and what parenting behaviors may be effective in attenuating associations between online substance exposure and use.

family studies,psychology, developmental,psychiatry

[A case of recurrent, metastatic Merkel's tumor localized in the gluteal region].

Recreational Cannabis Legalization, Retail Sales, and Adolescent Substance Use Through 2021

Recreational Marijuana Laws and Teen Marijuana Use, 1993-2021

Prospective, longitudinal study to isolate the impacts of marijuana use on neurocognitive functioning in adolescents

Evolving disparities in cannabis use among youth by demographics, tobacco and alcohol use in the US: 2013-2021

Youth Exposure to Recreational Cannabis Legalization: Moderation of Effects by Sex and Parental Cannabis Use during Adolescence

Associations between e-cigarette policies and adolescent use and access to e-cigarettes

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cannabis Use Following Legalization in US States With Medical Cannabis Laws

Why Are Adolescent Cannabis Use Disorder Treatment Admissions Declining in the US? The Mediated Pathway of State Treatment Admissions Rates before and after Recreational Cannabis Legalization

From high school to higher education: Is recreational marijuana a consumption amenity for US college students?

Effect modification of legalizing recreational cannabis use on the association between e-cigarette use and future cannabis use among US adolescents

Cannabis reduction among adolescents as spillover from successful tobacco control

Nicotine and Alcohol Use as Predictors of Recreational Cannabis Use in Adolescence: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

The Regulatory and Marketing Environment Surrounding the Legalization of Retail Marijuana and the Impact on Youth

Recreational cannabis legalization and pediatric exposures in Massachusetts, United States

The association between state cannabis policies and cannabis use among adults and youth, United States, 2002–2019

Changes of hippocampal protein levels during postnatal brain development in the rat

Flavoured tobacco product restrictions in Massachusetts associated with reductions in adolescent cigarette and e-cigarette use

US Epidemiology of Cannabis Use and Associated Problems

Assessing the Impact of Recreational Cannabis Legalization on Cannabis Use Disorder and Admissions to Treatment in the United States

Exposure to Peers' Online Postings about Substances and Adolescents' Substance Use: a Longitudinal Study