Toward a theory-based specification of non-pharmacological treatments in aging and dementia: Focused reviews and methodological recommendations

Sietske A M Sikkes,Yi Tang,Roos J Jutten,Linda M P Wesselman,Lyn S Turkstra,Henry Brodaty,Linda Clare,Erin Cassidy-Eagle,Kay L Cox,Gaël Chételat,Sophie Dautricourt,Klodian Dhana,Hiroko Dodge,Rose-Marie Dröes,Benjamin M Hampstead,Thomas Holland,Amit Lampit,Kate Laver,Antoine Lutz,Nicola T Lautenschlager,Susan M McCurry,Franka J M Meiland,Martha Clare Morris,Kimberly D Mueller,Ruth Peters,Gemma Ridel,Aimee Spector,Jenny T van der Steen,Jeanette Tamplin,Zara Thompson,ISTAART Non-pharmacological Interventions Professional Interest Area,Alex Bahar-Fuchs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12188
Abstract:Introduction: Non-pharmacological treatments (NPTs) have the potential to improve meaningful outcomes for older people at risk of, or living with dementia, but research often lacks methodological rigor and continues to produce mixed results. Methods: In the current position paper, experts in NPT research have specified treatment targets, aims, and ingredients using an umbrella framework, the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System. Results: Experts provided a snapshot and an authoritative summary of the evidence for different NPTs based on the best synthesis efforts, identified main gaps in knowledge and relevant barriers, and provided directions for future research. Experts in trial methodology provide best practice principles and recommendations for those working in this area, underscoring the importance of prespecified protocols. Discussion: We conclude that the evidence strongly supports various NPTs in relation to their primary targets, and discuss opportunities and challenges associated with a unifying theoretical framework to guide future efforts in this area.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?