Relation of Stress‐Induced Analgesia to Stimulation‐Produced Analgesia a

G. Terman,J. Liebeskind

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb14636.x

IF: 6.499

1986-06-01

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract:It has been twenty years since the gate control theory of Melzack and Wall' was published and began to focus so much attention on the field of pain research. In those years, major developments have occurred transforming this once sleepy field into one of the liveliest areas of behavioral, neuroscientific, and biomedical research. One exciting development portended by their theory has been the discovery of a central nervous system substrate whose normal function appears to be pain modulation. This substrate includes cells of the medial brain stem and fibers descending from them to the spinal cord dorsal horn. In the cord, the transmission of nociceptive inputs from peripheral fibers to ascending systems and reflex paths is modulated by these descending controls. Opioid peptides play a significant role in such processes of pain inhibition. We now know, however, that nonopioid mechanisms also exist, offering hope for the development of analgesic therapies lacking the unwanted properties of opiate drugs. Application of this new knowledge about intrinsic pain control systems has already been made by neurosurgeons adapting the techniques of direct medial brain stem stimulation from the original animal studies reporting dramatic stimulationproduced analgesia2" to the alleviation of chronic pain symptoms in man! The success of such clinical trials constitutes one of the clearest examples of the benefits of behavioral and neuroscientific research on laboratory animals, as recently cited by Millers5 Until recently, most of the evidence suggesting the existence of an endgenous pain-suppressive system has come from studies of stimulation-produced analgesia. Electrically stimulating the midbrain periaqueductal gray matter and portions of the medial brain stem rostra1 and caudal to it causes profound analgesia in awake rats without reliably causing other sensory, motor, or motivational deficits. These findings suggested a natural pain-inhibitory role for these brain regions3 Before one could accept the existence of such a system, however, or credit it with more than epiphenomena1 status, it would be essential to know under what circumstances it normally is used. In our earliest consideration of this matter: we suggested that an endogenous analgesia substrate ought not be readily accessed or trivially employed; noxious stimuli generally hurt, and the warning signals they provide lead to important adaptive behavior. On the other hand, we reasoned, perhaps under certain conditions of dire emergency, when the perception of pain might disrupt effective defensive behavior or retreat, then pain suppression would have greater survival value than pain perception itself. The recent literature on stress-induced analgesia lends credence to this