Abstract:Detecting mitigating and correcting errors in quantum control is among the most pertinent contemporary problems in quantum technologies. We consider three of the most common bosonic error correction codes -- the CLY, binomial and dual rail and compare their performance under typical errors in bosonic systems. We find that the dual rail code shows the best performance. We also develop a new technique for error mitigation in quantum control. We consider a quantum system with large Hilbert space dimension, e.g., a qudit or a multi-qubit system and construct two $2- $ dimensional subspaces -- a code space, $\mathcal C = \text{span}\{|\bar{0}\rangle, |\bar{1}\rangle\}$ where the logical qubit is encoded and a ``proxy'' space $\mathcal P = \text{span}\{|\bar{0}'\rangle, |\bar{1}'\rangle\}$. While the qubit (i.e., $\mathcal C$) can be a part of a quantum circuit, the proxy (i.e., $\mathcal P$) remains idle. In the absence of errors, the quantum state of the proxy qubit does not evolve in time. If $\mathcal E$ is an error channel acting on the full system, we consider its projections on $\mathcal C$ and $\mathcal P$ represented as pauli transfer matrices $T_{\mathcal E}$ and $T'_{\mathcal E}$ respectively. Under reasonable assumptions regarding the origin of the errors, $T_{\mathcal E}$ can be inferred from $T'_{\mathcal E}$ acting on the proxy qubit and the latter can be measured without affecting the qubit. The latter can be measured while the qubit is a part of a quantum circuit because, one can perform simultaneous measurements on the logical and the proxy qubits. We use numerical data to learn an \textit{affine map} $\phi$ such that $T_{\mathcal E} \approx \phi(T'_{\mathcal E})$. We also show that the inversion of a suitable proxy space's logical pauli transfer matrix can effectively mitigate the noise on the two modes bosonic system or two qudits system.

Solution to the mean king's problem using quantum error-correcting codes

Decoding general error correcting codes and the role of complementarity

Mitigating Non-Markovian and Coherent Errors Using Quantum Process Tomography of Proxy States

Fault-Tolerant Error Correction with Efficient Quantum Codes

Error Correction in Quantum Communication

Quantum Error-Correcting Codes Need Not Completely Reveal the Error Syndrome

Short Codes for Quantum Channels with One Prevalent Pauli Error Type

The Quantum Decoding Problem

Finite-round quantum error correction on symmetric quantum sensors

Quantum Data-Syndrome Codes

Quantum Error-Correcting Codes with Preexisting Protected Qubits

Optimal Single-Shot Decoding of Quantum Codes

Self-Testing Quantum Error Correcting Codes: Analyzing Computational Hardness

Quantum subspace verification for error correction codes

Correcting detection error in quantum computation and state engineering through data processing

Decoding Algorithm Correcting Single-Insertion Plus Single-Deletion for Non-binary Quantum Codes

Bounds on Autonomous Quantum Error Correction

Quantum Error Correction Alleviates Detection-Induced Coherent Errors

Quantum Error Correcting Subsystem Codes From Two Classical Linear Codes

Modeling error correction with Lindblad dynamics and approximate channels