Fatty acid composition of human milk triglyceride species. Possible consequences for optimal structures of infant formula triglycerides.

Chiel H. Winter,E. B. Hoving,F. Muskiet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(93)80466-H

IF: 4.601

1993-06-01

Journal of Chromatography A

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A Comparative Study to Analyze the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy Combined with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Residual Calculi after Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy

Gang Xu,Jiaming Wen,Zhongyi Li,Zhewei Zhang,Xiuqing Gong,Jimin Chen,Chuanjun Du

2015-01-01

Abstract:A certain proportion of patients with initial Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) management require ancillary procedures to increase the stone-free rate. In this study, we aim to analyze the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy combined with holmium laser lithotripsy (F-UL) for treatment of residual calculi after PCNL by comparison with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Total of 96 patients with residual renal calculi (4 mm to 20 mm) after PCNL was enrolled from May 2010 to March 2013. They were randomly divided into two groups: US Group: patients were treated with F-UL; SWL Group: patients were treated with SWL. Follow-up was made one month and three months after treatment. The mean residual stone size after PCNL was 12.4 ± 4.3 mm in US group compared with 11.9 ± 4.5 in SWL group. The stone-free rate was 84.7% one month after surgical procedure in US group, this rate increased to 91.3% in the third months, while the stone-free rate in SWL group is 64.6% one month after treatment and 72.9% in the third month. For residual stone in lower calyx, the stone-free rate three month after treatment was 90.4% in US group compared to 65.2% in SWL group (P < 0.05). The overall complication rate was low in both groups, no severe complication was found. Both F-UL and SWL are safe and effective methods for residual calculi after PCNL, without severe complications. F-UL provided significantly higher stone-free rate compared with SWL, especially for low-pole calculi.
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy with Holmium Laser in the Management of Stones in the Horseshoe Kidney (report of 13 Cases)

杨春,高小峰,周铁,彭泳涵,李凌,许传亮,王林辉,孙颖浩

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1420.2012.02.001

2012-01-01

Journal of Clinical Urology

Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic effect of flexible ureterorenoscopy(F-URS) with holmium laser in treating stones in the horseshoe kidney(HSK). Method:We retrospectively reviewed the records of 13 patients who underwent F-URS using a holmium laser from January 2005 to December 2010 for HSK stones.The average stone diameter was 1.7 cm(range1.2-2.3 cm).The presenting symptoms were renal colic,urinary tract infection,or hematuria.F-URS was used in as an alternative after the failure of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 6 patients and percutaneous nephrolithotomy failure in 2 patients.At one week before operations,all patients was placed the Double-J stent and underwent urinalysis,urine culture,intravenous urography with tomograms,renal computed tomography(CT).The ureteral access sheaths was placed firstly during operation,and then ureterorenoscope was inserted into the renal pelvis.Follow-up examination was performed after two months with plain radiography of the kidneys,ureters,and bladder and renal ultrasonography,or noncontrast CT.Success was defined as stone-free status or residual fragments 3 mm. Result:Flexible ureterorenoscopes were successfully placed in all patients.The operative success rate was 92.3%.All patients were symptom free after operation.The average operative time and hospital stay were 90 minutes and 2 days,respectively.No severe complications occured. Conclusion:F-URS with the holmium laser is a safe,efficient minimal invasive procedure as a reasonable alternative for treating HSK stones.
Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy in management of 2-4cm renal stones

Gao Xiaofeng,Li Ling,Peng Yonghan,Zhou Tie,Sun Yinghao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2013.01.014

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for 2-4cm renal calculi.Methods:Between January 2007 and April 2012,99 cases of renal stones treated with flexible ureteroscopy in our hospita 1 were retrospectively reviewed.56 cases of stones were located in renal pelvis,9 cases at upper calyx,13 at middle calyx and 21 at lower calyx.Stone size ranges from 0.4-5.4cm.Two weeks before operations,all patients were placed Double-J stents.Holmium laser was used to perform the procedure and double-J stent was set at the end of the procedure.KUB and CT were performed to evaluate therapeutic effects.Results:The success rate of the ureteroscopic insertion was 100%.Stone free rate(SFR)cases were 76.7%(76/99) for single procedure and 94.9%(94/99) for second procedure.The average operation time was 128(61-180)mins.6 cases had a urosepsis,1 case had renal subcapsular hematoma and 3 solitary kidney cases had severe steinstrasse. Conclusions:Flexible ureteroscopy with Holmium laser lithotripsy are safe,effective and mini-invasive by now,and may offer as an alternative therapy for 2-4cm renal stones.
Low-energy high-frequency Ho-YAG lithotripsy: is RIRS going forward? A case–control study

D. Peretti,E. Dalmasso,A. Pecoraro,C. Ambruosi,F. Venzano,C. Fiori,F. Porpiglia,O. Maugeri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01282-2

2021-08-23

Urolithiasis

Abstract:Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery (RIRS) plays a primary role in renal stone treatment context. Energy, frequency and width of laser impulse can be modulated by surgeons to achieve better outcomes. In our study, patients with single renal stone sized 10–20 mm were retrospectively divided into two groups. Patients of Group 1 underwent RIRS with Low-Energy (LE) High-Frequency (HF) settings using Lumenis® 120-W high-power Ho:YAG laser. Patients of Group 2 (control) underwent RIRS using "standard" settings by means of Sphinx® Jr 30 W Ho:YAG system. Follow-up was conducted with a CT scan at 3 months after RIRS in both groups. Procedure success was defined as stone-free or presence of ≤ 4 mm fragments (Clinical Insignificant Residual Fragments—CIRF). A total number of 199 patients were included: 86 LE/HF RIRS (Group 1) vs 113 "conventional" RIRS (Group 2). Mean operative time was 56.6 (± 19.4) min in Group 1 vs 65.2 (± 25.2) min in Group 2 (p = 0.01). Mean hospitalization time was 2.5 ± 1.7 days for Group 1 vs 2.9 ± 3.2 days for Group 2 (p = 0.2). Peri-operative complications were counted: eight in Group 1 and 11 in Group 2 (p > 0.05). At 3-month control, stone-free rate was 69% (59/86 patients) in Group 1 vs 65% (73/113 patients) in Group 2 (p = 0.6). Success rate was 93% (80/86) in Group 1 in comparison to 82% (93/113) in Group 2 (p = 0.03). In conclusion, LE/HF RIRS seems to be a feasible and effective technique with a reduction of operative time and optimal results in terms of "stone-free" and "success" rates. Further studies are needed to ensure the validity of our results and to give evidence-based statements.

urology & nephrology
Some reflections on the history of medicine.

C. de Duve

Abstract:
Holmium laser lithotripsy for treatment of urinary calculi (report of 1216 cases)

Zhong Wu,Hao-wen Jiang,Qiang Ding,Hua-wei Zhang,Chun-jun Li,Yuan-fang Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2006.07.021

2006-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of urinary calculi.Methods A total of 1216 cases of urinary calculi underwent ureteropyeloscopic and cyctocopic holmium laser lithotripsy.There were 1 006 cases of ureteral stones(302 cases of upper ureteral stones,364 cases of middle ureteral stones,and 340 cases of lower ureteral stones) and 210 cases of bladder stones.Results In 1 case of upper ureteral stones,failure to access the ureteral orifice due to enlarged prostate was encountered,and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) was employed.In 1006 cases of ureteral stones,the rate of successful fragmentation on single session was 95.5%(961/1 006),with 89.4%(270/302),96.4%(351/364),and 100%(340/340) for upper,middle,and lower ureteral stones,respectively.Ureteral perforation was encountered during lithotripsy in 6 cases.In 210 cases of bladder stones,the rate of successful fragmentation on one session was 100%(210/210).No bleeding or bladder perforation was observed during lithotripsy.Follow-up checkups for 0.5~40 months(mean,18.6 months) in 881 cases of ureteral stones showed that the stone-free rates were 91.1%(224/246),98.5%(318/323),and 100%(312/312) for upper,middle,and lower ureteral stones,respectively.The overall stone-free rate for all levels of ureteral stones achieved 96.9%((854/881)).Ureteral stenosis was found in 6 cases.Follow-up checkups for 0.5~31 months(mean,12.4 months) in 187 cases of bladder stones revealed a stone-free rate of 98.4%(184/187). Conclusions Holmium laser lithotripsy is a highly effective,minimally invasive,and safe therapy for urinary calculi.It is indicated as the first choice of treatment for patients with ureteral stones and bladder stones.
2013 brought reform, gridlock, glitches and accountable care.

H. Meyer

2013-12-23

Modern Healthcare

Abstract:
Management of Intrarenal and Proximal Ureteral Stones by Standardized Flexible Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy:a Single Center Experience from 140 Cases

刘可,肖春雷,刘余庆,张树栋,郝一昌,田雨,马潞林

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2015.12.003

2015-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of standardized flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of intrarenal and proximal ureteral stones. Methods From October 2012 to October 2014, 140 patients underwent standardized flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in our hospital. All the patients received KUB and IVP or CTU preoperatively.Thirty-eight patients with intrarenal stones underwent double-J stent placement for 10-14 days before operation.An optical-fiber or digital-fiber flexible ureteroscopy with 200 μm holmium laser fiber and standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique were used for treatment.A semirigid ureteroscopy was performed followed by guidewire and sheath placement and then flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy.The burdens of proximal ureteral stones were fragmented and pushed backward into the renal pelvic during semirigid ureteroscopic inspection, then the intrarenal stones and residual fragments retrieved were managed by flexible ureteroscopy.A double-J stent was placed postoperatively.Traditional Chinese medicine was given for 1-2 months after operation.Stone clearance was estimated by KUB within 2 months of follow-up. Results The operation time was 36 -243 min (mean, 114.7 min), and the estimated blood loss was 2-100 ml (mean, 11.4 ml).Except for 4 cases of medullary sponge kidney cases, the stone clearance rates were 91.7% (77/84) for renal stones and 94.8% (129/136) for overall.For stones with cumulative size more than 2 cm, the average operation time was 128.5 min (range, 63-213 min) and the stone clearance rate was 71.4%(10/14).The success rates of flexible ureteroscopy intervention in patients with or without preoperative double-J stent placement were 100% (38/38) and 82.0%(41/50) respectively.The hospital stay after operation was 1-5 d (mean, 3.6 d).There were no major complications identified. Serious postoperative urinary tract infection occurred in 8 patients.The sepsis rate was 5.7%(8/140), including 9.1%(8/88) for renal stones and 28.6% (4/14) for stones with cumulative size more than 2 cm. Conclusions In selected patients, proximal ureteral and intrarenal stones can be treated safely and efficiently with standardized flexible ureteroscopic homium laser lithotripsy. However, the efficiency and safety are lowered in patients with stone cumulative size more than 2 cm.
Multicentric evaluation of high and low power lasers on RIRS success using propensity score analysis

Eren Erol,Gokhan Ecer,Murat Can Kiremit,Mehmet İlker Gokce,Mehmet Balasar,Ahmet Furkan Sarikaya,Muammer Babayigit,Umut Can Karaarslan,Elif Ipek Aksoy,Kemal Sarica,Kamran Ahmed,Selçuk Güven

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01535-w

2024-02-11

Urolithiasis

Abstract:In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of HPL on different parameters by different centers and urologists. While doing this, we evaluated different parameters by comparing HPL(High Power laser) and LPL(Low-power laser). This is an observational, retrospective, comparative, multicentric study of prospectively organised database. A total of 217 patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones smaller than 2 cm in three different centers were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups; LPL used (Group1, n:121 patients) and HPL used (Group2, n:96). Propensity score matching was done in the data analysis part. After matching, a total of 192 patients, 96 patients in both groups, were evaluated. There was no difference between the groups regarding age, gender, stone side, and stone location. The stone-free rate on the first day was 80.3% in Group 1, it was 78.1% in Group 2 ( p = 0.9). In the third month, it was 90.7% in Group 1 and 87.5% in Group 2 (p:0.7).Hospitalization duration was significantly higher in Group 1. (2.35 ± 2.27 days vs. 1.42 ± 1.10 days; p < 0.001).The operation duration was 88.70 ± 29.72 min in Group1 and 66.17 ± 41.02 min in Group2 ( p < 0.001). The fluoroscopy time (FT) was 90.73 ± 4.79 s in Group 1 and 50.78 ± 5.64 s in Group 2 ( p < 0.001). Complications according to Clavien Classification, were similar between the groups( p > 0.05). According to our study similar SFR and complication rates were found with HPL and LPL. In addition, patients who used HPL had lower operation time, hospital stay, and fluoroscopy time than the LPL group. Although high-power lasers are expensive in terms of cost, they affect many parameters and strengthen the hand of urologists thanks to the wide energy and frequency range they offer.

urology & nephrology
Comparison of high and low pulse energy dusting protocols using holmium: YAG laser in flexible ureteroscopy for treatment of renal stones

M Elshazly,K M Zeinelabden,M Aziz,H Kandeel,M Selim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20905998.2024.2343181

2024-04-15

Abstract:Objectives: The management of renal stones, particularly those less than 2 cm in diameter, has changed with the development of endourological techniques, among which flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) using laser for lithotripsy has become a cornerstone. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of high pulse energy versus low pulse energy laser settings in renal stone dusting by Holmium YAG laser. Patients and methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted between September 2021 and November 2023 to compare the efficacy and safety of high energy versus low-energy pulse settings using a Holmium: YAG laser dusting of renal stones less than 2 cm in diameter. A total of 174 adult patients were included, divided equally into high- and low-pulse energy groups, based on the energy settings of the laser high energy (ranged from 1.2-2.5 Joules and frequency of 8 hz) and low energy (less than 0.5 Joules and frequency ≥ 15 hz) using the dusting ‎technique with non-touch non-stop approach. The study sought to evaluate the impact of these settings on stone fragmentation efficiency, operative time, laser energy consumption, and postoperative outcomes, including stone-free rates and complications. Results: The study involved 174 patients who underwent renal stone lithotripsy and showed that using high pulse energy laser dusting settings significantly reduced operative times and more rapid dusting compared to low pulse energy settings, without affecting the stone-free rate. The study observed no significant differences in stone size or location between both groups. Minor postoperative complications were similar between both groups, indicating high pulse energy settings for lithotripsy dusting. Conclusion: The efficacy of high pulse energy dusting in enhancing stone removal during surgery, potentially reducing operative time. Further validation through larger-scale studies is needed to solidify these findings. This technique presents a promising solution, particularly in regions with limited resources where acquiring expensive laser equipment is challenging.
Safety and efficacy of 'Dusting and Pop-dusting' with high power laser for treatment of large stones with ureteroscopy and lasertripsy (URSL): Prospective outcomes from a university teaching hospital

Bhaskar K Somani,Virginia Massella,Amelia Pietropaolo,Francesco Ripa,Mrigyanka Sinha,Stephen Griffin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0150

2024-02-08

Journal of Endourology

Abstract:Introduction: The wide use of high-power laser has changed the landscape of ureteroscopy and lasertripsy (URSL). We wanted to look at the role and outcomes of high power Ho:YAG laser for URSL in paediatric stone disease. Methods: A prospective analysis of consecutive paediatric patients treated with 'Dusting and Pop-dusting' using a high-power laser was done between January 2016 to March 2022. The project was registered with our audit committee. Data was analysed for patient demographics, stone characteristics, operative details, procedural outcomes and complications. Stone free rate (SFR) was defined as fragments ≤2 mm on post-op ultrasound imaging 2-3 months after the procedure. Results: A total of 35 patients underwent 43 procedures (1.2 procedure/patient) during the study period with a mean age of 9.4 years (range:1-16 years) and a male:female ratio of 13:22. The stone location was in the kidney in 32 (91.4%) patients of which 8 were in multiple renal locations. The mean stone size was 18 mm (range:10-39mm), with the pre and post stent rates of 37% and 56% respectively. An access sheath was used in 19 (44%) procedures. The overall stone free rate (SFR) on ultrasound scan was 94% (n=33) with no procedural complications noted in our series and a mean length of stay of 0.9 days. Conclusion: Paediatric URSL using a high-power laser achieves a high SFR even for large and multiple renal stones with no complications noted in our prospective series. Parents must however be counselled about the need for staged procedures which might be needed for large stones.

urology & nephrology
Energies, electron densities, and first-order density matrices from one-body external potentials.

Osburn,Lévy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVA.33.2230

1986-04-01

Abstract:
Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation (URSL) for Kidney Stone Disease (KSD): Comparative Cohort Study Using MOSES Technology 60 W Laser System versus Regular Holmium 20 W Laser

Amelia Pietropaolo,Thomas Hughes,Mriganka Mani,Bhaskar Somani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132742

IF: 3.9

2021-06-22

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background: For ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL), the use of laser technology has shifted from low power to higher power lasers and the addition of Moses technology, that allows for ‘fragmentation, dusting and pop-dusting’ of stones. We wanted to compare the outcomes of URSL for Moses technology 60 W laser system versus matched regular Holmium 20 W laser cases. Methods: Prospective data were collected for patients who underwent URSL using a Moses 60 W laser (Group A) and matched to historical control data using a regular Holmium 20 W laser (Group B), performed by a single surgeon. Data were collected for patient demographics, stone location, size, pre- and post-operative stent, operative time, length of stay, complications and stone free rate (SFR). Results: A total of 38 patients in each group underwent the URSL procedure. The stones were matched for their location (17 renal and 11 ureteric stones). The mean single and cumulative stone sizes (mm) were 10.9 ± 4.4 and 15.5 ± 9.9, and 11.8 ± 4.0 and 16.5 ± 11.3 for groups A and B, respectively. The mean operative time (min) was 51.6 ± 17.1 and 82.1 ± 27.0 (p ≤ 0.0001) for groups A and B. The initial SFR was 97.3% and 81.6% for groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.05), with 1 and 7 patients in each group needing a second procedure (p = 0.05), for a final SFR of 100% and 97.3%. While there were 2 and 5 Clavien I/II complications for groups A and B, none of the patients in group A had any infection related complication. Conclusions: Use of Moses technology with higher power was significantly faster for stone lithotripsy and reduced operative time and the number of patients who needed a second procedure to achieve a stone free status. It seems that the use of Moses technology with a mid-power laser is likely to set a new benchmark for treating complex stones, without the need for secondary procedures in most patients.

medicine, general & internal
Oxygen-sensitive {delta}-opioid receptor-regulated survival and death signals: novel insights into neuronal preconditioning and protection.

M. Ma,H. Qian,F. Ghassemi,P. Zhao,Ying Xia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/JBC.M408055200

IF: 5.485

2005-04-22

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract:The detrimental effect of severe hypoxia (SH) on neurons can be mitigated by hypoxic preconditioning (HPC), but the molecular mechanisms involved remain unclear, and an understanding of these may provide novel solutions for hypoxic/ischemic disorders (e.g. stroke). Here, we show that the delta-opioid receptor (DOR), an oxygen-sensitive membrane protein, mediates the HPC protection through specific signaling pathways. Although SH caused a decrease in DOR expression and neuronal injury, HPC induced an increase in DOR mRNA and protein levels and reversed the reduction in levels of the endogenous DOR peptide, leucine enkephalin, normally seen during SH, thus protecting the neurons from SH insult. The HPC-induced protection could be blocked by DOR antagonists. The DOR-mediated HPC protection depended on an increase in ERK and Bcl 2 activity, which counteracted the SH-induced increase in p38 MAPK activities and cytochrome c release. The cross-talk between ERK and p38 MAPKs displays a "yinyang" antagonism under the control of the DOR-G protein-protein kinase C pathway. Our findings demonstrate a novel mechanism of HPC neuroprotection (i.e. the intracellular up-regulation of DOR-regulated survival signals).
Comparison of conventional (basketing + dusting) and Moses (pop-dusting) holmium lasers during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones between 2 and 3 cm: a randomized clinical trial

Xiaodong Hao,Zefeng Wang,Shuo Zheng,Zheng Chao,Yanan Wang,Chunyu Zhang,Weimin Yu,Haojie Shang,Qiugong Xiao,Jianbing Du,Zhiqiang Chen,Le Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01566-3

2024-06-15

Urolithiasis

Abstract:To investigate the feasibility of conventional (basketing + dusting) and Moses (pop-dusting) holmium lasers during flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) in the treatment of 2–3 cm renal calculi and to compare the efficiency and safety of the two methods, a total of 230 patients with 2–3 cm kidney stones who underwent FURS were randomly divided into the conventional group and the Moses group. The mode of lithotripsy in the conventional group was fragmentation and dusting. The mode of lithotripsy in the Moses group was dusting and pop-dusting. Clinical and perioperative variables and complications were compared between the two cohorts. Multivariate analyses of factors contributing to the stone-free rate (SFR) and operation time were performed. No statistically significant differences were found in the demographics, renal stone-related data, SFR, or complications between the cohorts. The laser energy was higher in the Moses cohort than in the conventional cohort (119.3 ± 15.2 vs. 92.8 ± 15.1 kJ; P < 0.001), and the operation time was shorter in the Moses cohort than in the conventional cohort (99.5 ± 18.9 vs. 105.3 ± 13.7 min; P = 0.009). When there was isolated stone, the operation time was shorter in the Moses cohort than in the conventional cohort (99.6 ± 17.5 vs. 111.4 ± 10.7 min; P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between the two cohorts when there were multiple stones (99.5 ± 20 vs. 101.2 ± 14 min; P = 0.415). Multivariate analyses found that an increase in stone volume can decrease the SFR and prolong the operation time, and use of a Moses laser can shorten the operation time. Both holmium laser modes during FURS can effectively treat 2–3 cm renal calculi. The Moses mode is recommended as the first choice for the treatment of isolated 2–3 cm renal stones. When treating multiple stones, the efficiency of these two laser modalities is the same.

urology & nephrology
Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Urethral Calculi: an Analysis of 112 Cases

Xiao Zhang

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical effect of ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy on urethral calculi.Methods Clinical data of 112 patients with urethral calculi who were treated with ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy were retrospectively analyzed.Results Among the 112 patients,105(93.7%)achieved successful lithotripsy and 7 underwent failed ureteroscopy.No ureteral injury,perforation and mucosa avulsion occurred in all patients.Operation time was 30-65 minutes and postoperative hospital stay was 4-7 days.Double ureter B ultrasonography and plain abdominal X-ray examination were performed 3-6 weeks after operation and no residual stones were found(stone-free rate,97.3%).Among the 7 patients who underwent failed ureteroscopy,3 were converted to open operation because ureteroscope could not enter the ureteral orifice due prostatic hyperplasia and bladder neck elevation,2 were converted to open operation due to ureteral perforation and blurry vision caused by intraoperative bleeding after stones wrapped with inflammatory granulation tissue were cut and vaporized,and 2 were converted to ureterolithotomy because ureteroscope could not pass through ureters due to obvious tortuous ureter deformity.No complications such as massive hemorrhage,high fever,urine leakage and acute postoperative renal dysfunction occurred in all patients.Conclusion Ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy is a simple,safe and effective treatment and results in fewer postoperative complications in patients with urethral calculi.
Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Christopher R. Haas,Margaret A. Knoedler,Shuang Li,Daniel R. Gralnek,Sara L. Best,Kristina L. Penniston,Stephen Y. Nakada

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003050

2023-01-11

Abstract:We sought to compare the clinical effectiveness of the pulse-modulated Ho:YAG (holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet) laser and the thulium laser fiber for ureteroscopic stone management in a randomized clinical trial. The primary outcome was the ureteroscope time required to adequately fragment stones to 1 mm or less. Secondary outcomes were stone-free rate, complications, subjective surgeon measurement of laser performance, patient related stone quality of life outcomes, and measurements of laser efficiency. An Institutional Review Board-approved randomized clinical trial was conducted to randomize patients to outpatient treatment with either the Moses 2.0 or thulium laser fiber in a 1:1 manner after stratification into groups based on the maximal diameter of treated stone (3-9.9 mm or 10-20 mm). Patient, stone, and operative parameters were compared using the appropriate categorical/continuous and parametric/nonparametric statistical tests (SPSS 25). From July 16, 2021 to March 11, 2022, 108 patients were randomized and had primary endpoint data available for analysis; 52 patients were randomized to Ho:YAG and 56 patients to thulium laser fiber. Groups were well balanced with no significant differences observed for patient or stone characteristics. Ureteroscope time was not significantly different between modalities (Ho:YAG mean 21.4 minutes vs thulium laser fiber mean 19.9 minutes, P = .60), or within subgroup analysis by stone size, median Hounsfield units, or stone location. There were no significant differences observed in the stone-free rate and complications rate between the 2 lasers. This randomized clinical trial suggests no significant clinical advantage of one laser technology over the other. Surgeon and institutional preference are the best approach when selecting one or the other.

urology & nephrology
High-Frequency Dusting Versus Conventional Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Intrarenal and Ureteral Calculi

Roger Li,David Ruckle,Mohamed Keheila,Jonathan Maldonado,Michelle Lightfoot,Muhannad Alsyouf,Alexander Yeo,Samuel R Abourbih,Gaudencio Olgin,Javier L Arenas,D Duane Baldwin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0547

Abstract:Introduction: The efficiency of holmium laser lithotripsy for urolithiasis depends upon several factors, including laser pulse energy and frequency and stone composition and retropulsion. This study investigates the complex interplay between these factors and quantifies lithotripsy efficiency using different laser settings in a benchtop kidney and ureter model. Materials and methods: In vitro caliceal and ex vivo porcine ureteral models were constructed. Calcium oxalate monohydrate stones were fragmented using a 200-μm laser fiber. In the caliceal model, stone fragmentation and vaporization rates at settings of 0.6 J/5 Hz, 0.2 J/15 Hz, and 0.2 J/50 Hz were compared. In the ureteral model, fragmentation time, retropulsion rate, fragmentation rate, and fragmented stone weight were compared at settings of 0.6 J/5 Hz and 0.2 J/15 Hz. Retropulsive forces generated at 0.6 J/5 Hz, 0.2 J/15 Hz, and 0.2 J/50 Hz settings were compared. Analysis was performed using Student's t-test and one-way ANOVA. Results: In the caliceal model, the 0.6 J/5 Hz setting fragmented and vaporized stones at a higher rate than the 0.2 J/15 Hz setting (0.072 vs. 0.049 mg/s; p < 0.001). However, when the 0.2 J energy setting was combined with the 50 Hz frequency, the fragmentation rate (0.069 mg/s) was similar to the fragmentation rate at 0.6 J/5 Hz (0.072 mg/s; p = 0.677). In the ureteral model, the 0.6 J/5 Hz setting produced higher fragmentation rates (0.089 vs. 0.049 mg/s; p < 0.001), but resulted in significantly lower fragmented stone weight overall (16.815 vs. 25.485 mg; p = 0.009) due to higher retropulsion rates (0.732 vs. 0.213 mm/s; p < 0.001). Retropulsive forces decreased significantly when pulse energy decreased from 0.6 to 0.2 J (0.907 vs. 0.223 N; p < 0.001). Frequency did not affect retropulsive force at 15 and 50 Hz settings (0.223 vs. 0.288 N; p = 0.509). Conclusions: Laser lithotripsy of calcium oxalate monohydrate stones in the ureter should be performed using the low-energy, moderate-frequency dusting setting to minimize retropulsion and maximize efficiency. In the renal calix, the low-energy high-frequency setting performed similarly to the high-energy low-frequency setting.
Flexible ureteroscopic treatment of kidney stones: How do the new laser systems change our concepts?

Simin Yu,Linhu Liu,Ya Li,Liang Zhou,Jixiang Chen,Hong Li,Kunjie Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2023.11.001

2024-02-01

Asian Journal of Urology

Abstract:Objective Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has become a widely accepted and effective technique for treating kidney stones. With the development of new laser systems, the fURS approach has evolved significantly. This literature review examines the current state of knowledge on fURS treatment of kidney stones, with a particular focus on the impact of the latest laser technologies on clinical outcomes and patient safety. Methods We conducted a search of the PubMed, Medline, Web of Science Core Collection, SCOPUS, Embase (OVID), and Cochrane Databases for all randomized controlled trial articles on laser lithotripsy. Results We found a total of 22 relevant pieces of literature. Holmium laser has been used for intracavitary laser lithotripsy for nearly 30 years and has become the golden standard for the treatment of urinary stones. However, the existing holmium laser cannot completely powder the stone, and the retropulsion of the stone after the laser emission and the thermal damage to the tissue has caused many problems for clinicians. The introduction of thulium fiber laser and Moses technology brings highly efficient dusting lithotripsy effect through laser innovation, limiting pulse energy and broadening pulse frequency. Conclusion In this study, we summarize the current research status and new progress of laser lithotripsy and consider the selection of physical parameters from the development of existing lasers to explore the broader prospect of laser lithotripsy of urinary stones.

urology & nephrology
Clinical efficacy and safety of the superpulse thulium fiber laser and holmium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized, positive control, blinded, single-center clinical study {1}

Cheng Pang,Weiwei Fang,Fanguo Zhang,Ming Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08362-9

IF: 2.728

2024-11-28

Trials

Abstract:Kidney stone disease is a common problem. The holmium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet (HO:YAG) laser is currently the gold standard laser for ureterorenoscopic (URS) lithotripsy. Recently, the superpulse thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) has shown potential as a substitute for the HO:YAG laser. We aim to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the HO:YAG laser and SP TFL in the treatment of upper urinary calculi in this trial.

medicine, research & experimental

Fatty acid composition of human milk triglyceride species. Possible consequences for optimal structures of infant formula triglycerides.

A Comparative Study to Analyze the Efficacy and Safety of Flexible Ureteroscopy Combined with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Residual Calculi after Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy

Flexible Ureterorenoscopy with Holmium Laser in the Management of Stones in the Horseshoe Kidney (report of 13 Cases)

Flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy in management of 2-4cm renal stones

Low-energy high-frequency Ho-YAG lithotripsy: is RIRS going forward? A case–control study

Some reflections on the history of medicine.

Holmium laser lithotripsy for treatment of urinary calculi (report of 1216 cases)

2013 brought reform, gridlock, glitches and accountable care.

Management of Intrarenal and Proximal Ureteral Stones by Standardized Flexible Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy:a Single Center Experience from 140 Cases

Multicentric evaluation of high and low power lasers on RIRS success using propensity score analysis

Comparison of high and low pulse energy dusting protocols using holmium: YAG laser in flexible ureteroscopy for treatment of renal stones

Safety and efficacy of 'Dusting and Pop-dusting' with high power laser for treatment of large stones with ureteroscopy and lasertripsy (URSL): Prospective outcomes from a university teaching hospital

Energies, electron densities, and first-order density matrices from one-body external potentials.

Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Laser Stone Fragmentation (URSL) for Kidney Stone Disease (KSD): Comparative Cohort Study Using MOSES Technology 60 W Laser System versus Regular Holmium 20 W Laser

Oxygen-sensitive {delta}-opioid receptor-regulated survival and death signals: novel insights into neuronal preconditioning and protection.

Comparison of conventional (basketing + dusting) and Moses (pop-dusting) holmium lasers during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones between 2 and 3 cm: a randomized clinical trial

Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Urethral Calculi: an Analysis of 112 Cases

Pulse-modulated Holmium:YAG Laser vs the Thulium Fiber Laser for Renal and Ureteral Stones: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

High-Frequency Dusting Versus Conventional Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Intrarenal and Ureteral Calculi

Flexible ureteroscopic treatment of kidney stones: How do the new laser systems change our concepts?

Clinical efficacy and safety of the superpulse thulium fiber laser and holmium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized, positive control, blinded, single-center clinical study {1}