SUBCUTANEOUS TRANSPOSITION OF SPLEEN - AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

S. Bengmark,T. Olin,S. Sukuma,J. Vosmik

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

361. THE IMPACT OF A PROGRAM TO IMPROVE PREOPERATIVE NUTRITION AND REHABILITATION FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER PATIENTS

Toru Nakano,Kaori Koyama,Kentaro Sawada,Atsushi Mitamura,Tomoya Miura,Yo Kitamura,Yoshihiro Sato,Hiroto Sakurai,Kazuhiro Takami,Munetaka Nagao,Noriko Kondo,Kuniharu Yamamoto,Shingo Tsujinaka,Yo Katayose,Chikashi Shibata

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doad052.169

2023-08-30

Diseases of the Esophagus

Abstract:Abstract Background Improvement of the preoperative inflammation, nutrition, and other systemic conditions may reduce surgical complications and improve the prognosis of cancer. The usefulness of preoperative nutritional therapy and rehabilitation has recently been discussed. We created a novel program of preoperative rehabilitation and nutritional support to improve postoperative outcomes. We examined the nutritional status and blood electrolyte predisposition before and after this program. Methods Thirty five patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. These patients performed muscle strengthening exercise and received jelly beverage containing branched-chain amino acids immediately after rehabilitation and immune-modulating liquid diets for 7 consecutive days before surgery. Nutritional guidance was provided by a dietitian, who set a daily energy target of 30 kcal/kg and a protein target of 1.2 g/kg. Upper and lower limb strength training was performed with a physical therapist. Blood biochemical data on nutrition such as serum Alb, PreAlb, CRP, levels were compared after preoperative support. Results Thirty five patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in this period and evaluate their blood and serum samples. The average age of the patients was 66 years, 29 men and 6 women. Serum Alb level was 4.01 ± 0.4 g/dl before admission and 3.74 ± 0.35 g/dl the day before surgery (p = 0.04), and serum transthyretin level was unchanged from 28.9 ± 5.5 mg/dl to 26.1 ± 4.75 mg/dl. Serum CRP level tended to decrease from O.23 ± 0.528 mg/dl before admission to 0.14 ± 0.23 mg/dl the day before surgery. Other index of nutritional status did not change significantly before or after the program. Improvements in preoperative inflammation and nutrition are expected to decrease surgical complications and contribute to cancer prognosis. Our study and intervention in the present study may have decreased inflammation, although it was not a clear objective improvement in nutritional status. The short duration of the intervention may have prevented a significant difference. A less prolonged hospitalization is not realistic and the most effective nutritional rehabilitation intervention should be devised in the future.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Current status of perioperative nutritional intervention and exercise in gastric cancer surgery: A review

Satoshi Ida,Koshi Kumagai,Souya Nunobe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12520

2021-10-26

Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery

Abstract:Patients with gastric cancer are often malnourished or sarcopenic during tumor progression. Perioperative malnutrition, including sarcopenia, is strongly related to postoperative complications and long-term outcomes. To improve outcomes, nutritional intervention is common for patients with gastric cancer, especially for those undergoing elective surgery. Several clinical trials evaluating perioperative nutritional intervention have set postoperative loss of body weight and lean body mass as endpoints; however, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, recently, perioperative multimodal interventions that are expected to have a synergistic effect between nutritional intervention and exercise have gained attention. Furthermore, supplementing with leucine, a branched-chain amino acid, in addition to exercise, may be promising for preventing perioperative sarcopenia. However, whether perioperative nutritional intervention and exercise has clinical benefits in gastric surgery is unclear. With the aging of gastric cancer patients, measures to address sarcopenia will become more important in the future. Understanding the significance of nutritional intervention and exercise in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery will help achieve good outcomes.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Perioperative Artificial Enteral Nutrition in Malnourished Esophageal and Stomach Cancer Patients and Its Impact on Postoperative Complications

Ramesh C. Sagar,K. V. Veerendra Kumar,C Ramachandra,Ravi Arjunan,Syed Althaf,C Srinivas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-019-00930-9

2019-05-11

Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology

Abstract:Cancer is responsible for approximately 13% of all causes of death worldwide, and 20% of cancer patients die because of malnutrition and its complications. Malnutrition is common in cancer of stomach and esophagus. Although it is widely accepted that malnutrition adversely affects the postoperative outcome of patients, there is little evidence that perioperative nutrition support can reduce surgical risk in malnourished cancer patients. This prospective study was carried out from December 2016 to July 2017 at the Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru. After stratified for age, sex, and tumor localization, patients were selected non-randomly and assigned to study (n = 30, 14 women, 16 men) and control group (n = 30, 14 women, 16 men) as alternate patients. Within 48 h of admission, patients underwent nutritional assessment by the subjective global assessment. Perioperative nutrition was administered in the study group by enteral route only. Patients had a functioning gastrointestinal tract, and they received enteral nutrition (EN). Target intake of non-protein (25 kcal/kg per day) and protein (0.25 g nitrogen/kg per day) was provided using available enteral formulas. This was supplementary to standard hospital diet. Nutritional re-assessment after 15 days of intervention showed significant change in nutritional status, which was measured as gain in weight for each patient. There were significant differences in the mortality and complications between the two groups. The total length of hospitalization and postoperative stay of the control patients were significantly longer than those of the study patients. In conclusion, perioperative nutrition support can decrease the incidence of postoperative complications in moderately and severely malnourished gastric and esophageal cancer patients. In addition, it is effective in reducing mortality. Enteral nutrition support alone can be used in the management of malnourished patients undergoing gastric and esophageal surgery.
Association of preoperative sarcopenia with postoperative dysphagia in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer

Shuhei Mayanagi,Aiko Ishikawa,Kazuaki Matsui,Satoru Matsuda,Tomoyuki Irino,Rieko Nakamura,Kazumasa Fukuda,Norihito Wada,Hirofumi Kawakubo,Nanako Hijikata,Makiko Ando,Tetsuya Tsuji,Yuko Kitagawa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaa121

2021-09-09

Abstract:Background: The purpose of the current study was to clarify the relationship between clinical features of dysphagia after esophagectomy and preoperative sarcopenia. Methods: A total of 187 cases were included in the current study. The psoas cross-sectional area on pre-treatment computed tomography was measured in thoracic esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative resection. The psoas muscle index (PMI) cut-off levels for sarcopenia were 6.36 cm2/m2 for men and 3.92 cm2/m2 for women. Swallowing function was evaluated using videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) at postoperative days 7-15, and classified according to the food intake level scale (FILS). Perioperative swallowing rehabilitation was performed in all cases. Results: In the 187 included patients, the median PMI was 5.42 cm2/m2 for men and 3.43 cm2/m2 for women, and 133 cases (71%) met the sarcopenia criteria. The FILS <4 (no oral intake) was 15% in the non-sarcopenia group, and 38% in the sarcopenia group (P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications, including pneumonia and re-admission due to pneumonia, between the two groups. Preoperative sarcopenia and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were be independent risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Conclusions: Sarcopenic patients with esophageal cancer develop postoperative dysphagia more often than non-sarcopenic patients. Prehabilitation and nutritional support for patients with preoperative sarcopenia could play an important role to mitigate postoperative dysphagia.
Grade of esophageal cancer and nutritional status impact on postsurgery outcomes

Flávia Andréia Marin,Vânia Cristina Lamônica-Garcia,Maria Aparecida Coelho de Arruda Henry,Roberto Carlos Burini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032010000400006

2010-12-01

Arquivos de Gastroenterologia

Abstract:CONTEXT: Undernutrition is a well known underlying cause in both disease onset and outcome. OBJECTIVE: To associate disease severity with pre surgical nutritional status, the main postsurgical complications, and mortality in esophagus cancer patients. METHOD: Retrospective data from 100 patients (38-81 years old, 85% males) who had undergone esophagectomy (G1/n = 25) or gastro/jejunostomy (G2/n = 75) between 1995 and 2004. Data included clinical, endoscopic, histological (TNM-UICC), dietary, anthropometric, blood chemistry, and postsurgical (>30 days) complications and mortality. Surgical groups were compared by Student's test and existing associations between variables by either c2 or Fisher exact tests with P = 0.05. RESULTS: The studied sample was predominantly male (85%), white (80%), smokers and alcoholics (95%), dysphagics (95%) mostly presenting body weight loss before cancer diagnosis (78%). TNM III and IV predominated over I and II, associated (P<0.005) with higher body mass index and hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 mg/dL) frequency. Esophagic obstructions (n = 77) were associated (P = 0.002) with lower body mass index (kg/m2). Postsurgical complications were more common in G1 (69.2%) than G2, predominantly with infections in G2 (80%) and pleura-pulmonary in G1 (61%). Body mass index and lower lymphocyte counts were associated with early infections and postsurgical complications in G2. Plasma albumin levels were lower in this group than G1, and were associated with postsurgical complications and mortality whereas lower lymphocyte counts was associated with mortality in G1. CONCLUSIONS: Disease severity (or late diagnosis) is associated with poor nutritional status and palliative surgery which lead to more complicated postsurgery outcome and mortality. Early diagnosis and nutritional intervention are the recommended actions.
Nutritional Prehabilitation in Cancer Surgery: Basis and Basics

Rohit Agrawal,Li Xuanhui Janice

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6494-6_7

2022-01-01

Abstract:Cancer patients are often faced with nutritional challenges, where 50–80% were found to have varying degrees of malnutrition which is either due to inflammatory mediators released in response to tumour cells and thus leading to sarcopenia, altered fat and carbonydrate metabiolsim and anorexia or due to anatomical effect of tumour and surgery. If unchecked ongoing malnutrition can lead to refractory cancer cachexia which is associated with significant mortality.Nutritional prehabilitation is an essential part of a multimodal approach which allows patient-centred care to be delivered in a perioperative setting. Various assessment tools are available which takes into account physical, biochemical and radiological methods to classify degree of malnutrition. Depending upon severity of malnutrition, time available before surgery and tolerability of patient to oral nutrition therapy, precalculated calories should be delivered with optimal amounts of protein and other immunonutrients so as to minimize the impact of added surgical stress. Numerous studies have shown the beneficial impact of timely and appropriate nutrition which is monitored and tailored to patients’ needs. Other pharmacological interventions had been tried but failed to show significant advantage thus calling for further trials.
Postoperative Changes in Nutritional and Functional Status of Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients

Irene Lidoriki,Dimitrios Schizas,Konstantinos S Mylonas,Chrysovalantis Vergadis,Lysandros Karydakis,Andreas Alexandrou,Ioannis Karavokyros,Theodoros Liakakos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2021.1880986

Abstract:Objective: Disease-related malnutrition is a debilitating condition frequently observed in patients with cancer. The aim of the current study was to prospectively examine postoperative changes in nutritional and functional status of patients undergoing surgery for gastric, esophageal, and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Methods: Participants were prospectively recruited from September 2015 to September 2019. The assessment of malnutrition was based on the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment tool. The functional assessment included the evaluation of muscle strength and physical performance, while muscle mass assessment was based on Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI) derived from the analysis of computed tomography scans. The follow up of patients was scheduled at six months postoperatively. Results: A total of 98 patients were analyzed. Mean patient age was 60.79 ± 10.19 years and 80.6% were males. The mean unintentional weight loss at 6 months was 11.7 ± 8.0%. Patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy reported the greatest weight loss postoperatively (16.2 ± 9.6%), whereas the lowest rate of weight loss was observed in patients who underwent partial gastrectomy (5.6 ± 6.7%). The rate of severe malnutrition declined at six months postoperatively (39.7% vs 27%). Muscle strength and physical performance were significantly deteriorated at 6 months postoperatively, except for the group of partial gastrectomy, while SMI significantly decreased in all groups of patients except for McKewon esophagectomy group. Finally, the prevalence of low muscle mass increased significantly from 43.5% in the preoperative period to 66.7% at the follow-up. Conclusions: Our study revealed a significant deterioration in gastroesophageal cancer patient nutritional and functional status at six months postoperatively. The high prevalence of malnutrition and low muscle mass requires systematic follow-up and multidirectional monitoring in order to ensure the successful rehabilitation of these patients.
Primary nutritional assessment among patients with esophageal carcinoma before operation

Lu qian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-6975.2006.05.003

2006-01-01

Abstract:Objective To assess the nutritional status and analyze its influent factors for patients with esophageal carcinoma before operation,and to provide basis data for enhancing the nutritional status of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Methods Anthropometric methods,laboratory examination,mini-nutritional assessment(MNA) and subjective global assessment(SGA) were used to assess the nutritional status of 65 esophageal carcinoma patients before operation.Results Malnutrition rate of these patients according to different nutrition indexes were from 4.6% to 70.8%.It is 70.8% according to SGA and is 33.8% according to MNA.Some patients are over-nutrition.Malnutrition is related to the condition of taking food and the obstruction of esophageal.Conclusions All around nutrition indexes should be used to assess the nutritional status.Proper nutritional intervention should be given to esophageal carcinoma patients individually and enhance their nutritional status.
Perioperative Artificial Nutrition in Malnourished Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients

Guo-Hao Wu,Zhong-Hua Liu,Zhao-Han Wu,Zhao-Guang Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i15.2441

IF: 5.374

2006-01-01

World Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract:AIM:To investigate the potential role of perioperative nutrition in reducing complications and mortality in malnourished gastrointestinal cancer patients.METHODS:Four hundred and sixty-eight elective moderately or severely malnourished surgical patients with gastric or colorectal cancers defined by the subjective global assessment (SGA) were randomly assigned to 7 d preoperative and 7 d postoperative parenteral or enteral nutrition vs a simple control group. The nutrition regimen included 24.6+/-5.2 kcal /kg per d non-protein and 0.23+/-0.04 g nitrogen /kg per d. Control patients did not receive preoperative nutrition but received 600+/-100 kcal non-protein plus or not plus 62+/-16 g crystalline amino acids postoperatively.RESULTS:Complications occurred in 18.3% of the patients receiving nutrition and in 33.5% of the control patients (P=0.012). Fourteen patients died in the control group and 5 in those receiving nutrition. There were significant differences in the mortality between the two groups (2.1% vs 6.0%, P=0.003). The total length of hospitalization and postoperative stay of control patients were significantly longer (29 vs 22 d, P=0.014) than those of the studied patients (23 vs 12 d, P=0.000).CONCLUSION:Perioperative nutrition support is beneficial for moderately or severely malnourished gastrointestinal cancer patients and can reduce surgical complications and mortality.
Impact of Artificial Nutrition on Postoperative Complications

Sergio Sandrucci,Paolo Cotogni,Beatrice De Zolt Ponte

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040559

2020-12-14

Health Care

Abstract:Malnutrition is common in surgical cancer patients and it is widely accepted that it can adversely affect their postoperative outcome. Assessing the nutritional status of every patient, in particular care of elderly and cancer patients, is a crucial feature of the therapeutic pathway in order to optimize every strategy. Evidence exists that the advantages of perioperative nutrition are more significant in malnourished patients submitted to major surgery. For patients recognized as malnourished, preoperative nutrition therapies are indicated; the choice between parenteral and enteral nutrition is still controversial in perioperative malnourished surgical cancer patients, although enteral nutrition seems to have the best risk–benefit ratio. Early oral nutrition after surgery is advisable, when feasible, and should be administered in all the patients undergoing elective major surgery, if compliant. In patients with high risk for postoperative infections, perioperative immunonutrition has been proved in some ways to be effective, even if operations including those for cancer have to be delayed.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Prevention of Sarcopenia and Maintenance of Exercise Tolerance by Individualized Prehabilitation in a Patient With Esophageal Cancer During Preoperative Adjuvant Therapy: A Case Report

Ririko Sakamoto,Kazuki Okura,Yushi Nagaki,Akiyuki Wakita,Yusuke Sato

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64633

2024-07-16

Cureus

Abstract:Preoperative adjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer increases sarcopenia and decreases exercise tolerance, which are risk factors for postoperative pneumonia. Preoperative rehabilitation for patients undergoing esophagectomy effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative pneumonia. Therefore, the risk factors should be optimized by preoperative rehabilitation. Our patient had several risk factors for postoperative pneumonia, including low exercise tolerance, presarcopenia, and low respiratory muscle strength. However, because of the patient's advanced age, multiple comorbidities, and poor nutritional status, we struggled to determine the appropriate exercise intensity. Furthermore, there was a concern that chemotherapy-related adverse events could prevent adequate exercise from being performed. However, with individualized measures such as adjustable exercise intensity settings based on treatment status and nutritional management through multidisciplinary collaboration, it was possible to prevent sarcopenia and maintain exercise tolerance during preoperative adjuvant therapy. Individualized support in preoperative rehabilitation was suggested to contribute to the prevention of sarcopenia and maintenance of exercise tolerance during preoperative adjuvant therapy.
Intensified outpatient nutrition management improves body weight and skeletal muscle loss after esophageal cancer surgery: a single-center, retrospective, single-arm clinical study

Naoki Takahashi,Akihiko Okamura,Misuzu Ishii,Naoki Moriya,Aya Yamaguchi,Yuka Inamochi,Kumi Takagi,Erika Nakaya,Kengo Kuriyama,Masayoshi Terayama,Masahiro Tamura,Jun Kanamori,Yu Imamura,Yoko Saino,Masayuki Watanabe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03526-2

2024-11-05

Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery

Abstract:The progression of malnutrition and sarcopenia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer negatively influences long-term prognosis. To improve nutritional status after esophagectomy, we introduced an intensified nutrition management (iNM) protocol, in which nutritional counselling by dietitians was provided more frequently. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of iNM compared with the conventional NM (cNM).

surgery
Effect of Preoperative Nutritional Risk Screening and Enteral Nutrition Support in Accelerated Recovery after Resection for Esophageal Cancer

Yi Shen,Yunfeng Zhou,Tao He,Xiang Zhuang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2020.1764981

2020-05-13

Nutrition and Cancer

Abstract:Patients with esophageal cancer are often accompanied by malnutrition, especially in patients with obvious swallowing tract. Many studies have shown that preoperative nutritional support can reduce postoperative complications, but there are few studies comparing preoperative enteral nutrition with intravenous nutrition. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of the two nutritional support path in esophageal cancer patients undergoing surgery. We used the nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS2002) for preoperative nutritional risk screening in patients with esophageal cancer treated at our department between April 2016 and March 2019. A total of 56 patients with an NRS2002 score ≥ 3 and with apparent difficulty swallowing received preoperative parenteral nutrition (PN; n = 29) or enteral nutrition (EN; n = 27). Both groups received 7 day of nutritional support before surgery. Nutritional indicators were measured on preoperative day 7, preoperative day 1, and postoperative day 7. The baseline characteristics, perioperative condition, nutritional status, and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared and analysed. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics and perioperative nutrition indicators between two groups. Postoperative hospital stay and the costs of nutrition support were significantly reduced in the EN group compared with PN group (P = 0.000). The times of first passing gas and bowel movement were shorter in the EN group compared with PN group (P = 0.001). The incidence of gastrointestinal complications was lower in the EN group compared with PN group (P = 0.039). For esophageal cancer patients with an NRS2002 score ≥ 3 and apparent difficulty swallowing, preoperative EN with a gastric tube is safe and easy to perform. Preoperative EN can shorten the recovery time of gastrointestinal function, reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal complications, finally accelerate postoperative recovery.
Effect of preoperative oral nutritional supplements on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

QingHua Zou,ZhaoChuan Yin,LiLi Ding,Jiang Ruan,GuoYun Zhao,XiaoQiong Wang,YiJun Li,QingWen Xu,XueJing Gong,WenShuo Liu,KaiWen Shi,WeiMing Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000039844

IF: 1.6

2024-09-29

Medicine

Abstract:Gastrointestinal cancer is one of the most common cancers, and malnutrition is exceedingly common in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. [ 1 ] Malnutrition is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in surgical patients [ 2 ] and can lead to increased postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stay, increased medical costs, delayed recovery of gastrointestinal function, and seriously affect patient quality of life. [ 3–6 ] At present, surgical resection remains the main treatment for gastrointestinal cancer. However, relevant studies [ 4 , 7 ] have shown that preoperative malnutrition has a negative effect on the clinical prognosis of patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery, seriously affecting postoperative rehabilitation. Therefore, it is particularly important to improve the nutritional status of patients through reasonable nutritional support before surgery. Domestic and foreign nutritional guidelines [ 8 , 9 ] suggest that patients with nutritional risks and (or) malnutrition should receive preoperative nutritional support therapy for 7 to 14 days. Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) is preferred for patients that have a functional gastrointestinal tract and can eat orally. ONS refers to nutritional preparations that can provide patients with a variety of macro and micronutrients for the purpose of increasing nutrient intake. [ 9 ] ONS is simple, convenient, and compliant with human physiology. [ 10 ] It is an effective nutritional treatment for enhancing protein, fat, carbohydrate, mineral, and vitamin intake, and providing a balanced nutrient profile to surgical patients. [ 10 ] Intake of ONS can improve patient nutritional status and reduce the occurrence of postoperative adverse outcomes. [ 7 ] Several clinical studies and systematic reviews [ 11 , 12 ] 12 to 15 have shown that ONS accelerates wound healing, reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, shortens hospital stay, and improves quality of life. However, Burden et al [ 13 ] reported that standard oral nutritional supplements before surgery had no effect on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay (LOS). To date, studies testing whether preoperative ONS can effectively improve the clinical outcome of patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery have drawn different conclusions, and some have had conflicting results. Therefore, the clinical benefit of preoperative ONS in patients with gastrointestinal cancer remains controversial.

medicine, general & internal
Effects of Preoperative Nutrition on Postoperative Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yuqin Cao,Dingpei Han,Xiang Zhou,Yu Han,Yajie Zhang,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doab028

2022-01-01

Diseases of the Esophagus

Abstract:Postoperative enteral nutrition has been widely implemented in esophageal cancer, but the efficacy and safety of preoperative nutrition, particularly immune-enhancing nutrition (IEN), remain controversial. This meta-analysis aims to provide a quantitative synthesis of whether preoperative nutrition improves postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and databases of clinical trials dated up to December 2019. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing postoperative outcomes between esophageal cancer patients with and without preoperative nutritional support were included. Random-effects model was applied in the meta-analysis of primary outcomes (overall complication rate, in-hospital mortality) and secondary outcomes (infectious complication rate, anastomotic leak rate, length of postoperative hospital stay). Complications of feeding tube access and perioperative weight loss were evaluated by qualitative synthesis. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying immunonutrition and standard nutrition before surgery. Subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials alone was also done. A total of 15 studies enrolling 1864 participants were included. The overall meta-analysis found that preoperative nutrition could reduce infectious complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.26, 0.98]; I2 = 48%) and length of hospital stay (mean difference = -2.10 day, 95% CI [-3.72, -0.47]; I2 = 78%) after esophagectomy, whereas no significant difference was revealed in the incidence of overall complications (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.52, 1.11]; I2 = 32%), in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.41, 2.61]; I2 = 12%), and anastomotic leak (OR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.69, 1.58]; I2 = 0%). Subgroup of preoperative immunonutrition showed more prominent benefits. The complication rate of feeding tube access was low (1.6-16%). In conclusion, preoperative nutrition is safe in esophageal cancer, but benefits are observed in infectious complication rate and length of stay on a limited scale. IEN holds more advantages over standard nutrition. Randomized trials in the context of nutritional support during neoadjuvant therapy are in demand.
Cold agglutinin syndrome associated with a 2009 influenza A H1N1 infection.

Y. Schoindre,G. Bollée,M. Dumont,P. Lesavre,A. Servais

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.05.015

2011-02-01

Abstract:
Association of Preoperative Nutritional Status with Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Salvage Esophagectomy.

M. Sohda,N. Tanaka,D. Ozawa,Keigo Hara,T. Miyazaki,H. Kuwano,Yuji Kumakura,M. Sakai,H. Honjo,T. Yokobori,Shigemasa Suzuki,Tomonori Yoshida

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/ANTICANRES.12306

2018-02-01

Anticancer Research

Abstract:BACKGROUND To investigate whether malnutrition is associated with poor prognosis of patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy. We examined the association between the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and prognosis of patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a single-center retrospective study and reviewed hospital patient records for tumor characteristics and patient outcomes. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were carried out using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS Thirty-two patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent salvage esophagectomy between 1998 and 2015 at our Institute were included in this study. Univariate analysis revealed that clinical response (p=0.045), preoperative PNI (p<0.001), pT (p=0.024), pN (p=0.004), and residual tumors (p<0.001) were significant prognostic factor for overall survival. Multivariate analysis using age and these five variables found no independent prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis using three preoperative variables (age, clinical response, and preoperative PNI) revealed that PNI was an independent prognostic preoperative factor for overall survival (p=0.005). CONCLUSION Preoperative nutritional status is associated with the prognosis of patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy.

Medicine
T.F.J. Huda and J.E. Bowman, Age determination from dental microstructure in juveniles: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1995 vol. 97: 135-150.

S. Black,J. Scheuer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/AJPA.1331010203

1996-10-01

American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract:
Regulation of human B cell growth and differentiation: lessons from the primary immunodeficiencies.

R. Callard,S. Smith,D. J. Matthews

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000058682

Abstract:
Short-term effects of preoperative nutritional intervention in lung surgery for malignant tumors: a single-center prospective study

Mamoru Takahashi,Harutaro Okada,Mako Kogaki,Rio Shirokihara,Yuka Kawate,Hironobu Tokumasu,Akihiro Aoyama

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01998-5

IF: 1.227

2024-01-03

General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Abstract:Preoperative malnutrition is a risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients with lung cancer. Assessing the preoperative nutritional status should be considered essential for patients scheduled to undergo lung surgery. This prospective study aimed to investigate whether preoperative nutritional intervention improves the nutritional conditions and short-term postoperative outcomes.

surgery,cardiac & cardiovascular systems

SUBCUTANEOUS TRANSPOSITION OF SPLEEN - AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

361. THE IMPACT OF A PROGRAM TO IMPROVE PREOPERATIVE NUTRITION AND REHABILITATION FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER PATIENTS

Current status of perioperative nutritional intervention and exercise in gastric cancer surgery: A review

Perioperative Artificial Enteral Nutrition in Malnourished Esophageal and Stomach Cancer Patients and Its Impact on Postoperative Complications

Association of preoperative sarcopenia with postoperative dysphagia in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer

Grade of esophageal cancer and nutritional status impact on postsurgery outcomes

Nutritional Prehabilitation in Cancer Surgery: Basis and Basics

Postoperative Changes in Nutritional and Functional Status of Gastroesophageal Cancer Patients

Primary nutritional assessment among patients with esophageal carcinoma before operation

Perioperative Artificial Nutrition in Malnourished Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients

Impact of Artificial Nutrition on Postoperative Complications

Prevention of Sarcopenia and Maintenance of Exercise Tolerance by Individualized Prehabilitation in a Patient With Esophageal Cancer During Preoperative Adjuvant Therapy: A Case Report

Intensified outpatient nutrition management improves body weight and skeletal muscle loss after esophageal cancer surgery: a single-center, retrospective, single-arm clinical study

Effect of Preoperative Nutritional Risk Screening and Enteral Nutrition Support in Accelerated Recovery after Resection for Esophageal Cancer

Effect of preoperative oral nutritional supplements on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects of Preoperative Nutrition on Postoperative Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cold agglutinin syndrome associated with a 2009 influenza A H1N1 infection.

Association of Preoperative Nutritional Status with Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Salvage Esophagectomy.

T.F.J. Huda and J.E. Bowman, Age determination from dental microstructure in juveniles: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1995 vol. 97: 135-150.

Regulation of human B cell growth and differentiation: lessons from the primary immunodeficiencies.

Short-term effects of preoperative nutritional intervention in lung surgery for malignant tumors: a single-center prospective study