Abstract:Several atypical cytomorphologic features such as nuclear enlargement, a higher nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, and small urothelial cell clusters in voided urine samples were statistically more prevalent in histologically confirmed low‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma than in benign conditions. These atypical features were less pronounced compared with high‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. Low‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (LGPUC) diagnosis in urine cytology is challenging. Several atypical cytomorphologic features such as nuclear enlargement, a higher nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, and small urothelial cell clusters in voided urine samples were statistically more prevalent in histologically confirmed LGPUC than in benign conditions. These atypical features were less pronounced compared to high‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma. Therefore, meticulous scrutiny of cytomorphology is necessary for an accurate LGPUC diagnosis. Objective Given its frequent recurrence and the potential for high‐grade transformation, accurate diagnosis of low‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (LGPUC) in urine cytology is clinically important. We attempted to identify cytomorphologic features in urine samples, which could be helpful for the identification of LGPUC. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of voided urine specimens collected from patients with histopathologic diagnoses of LGPUC. Their cytomorphological features were compared with those from patients with benign conditions and high‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (HGPUC). Results A total of 115 voided urine specimens were evaluated, including 30 benign, 41 LGPUC, and 44 HGPUC cases. In LGPUC, 18 cases (44%) were diagnosed as atypical, a proportion significantly higher than that observed in benign cases (4 cases, 13%), while the remaining 23 cases (56%) were diagnosed as negative. LGPUC urine samples tended to have higher cellularity than benign cases, but the difference was not statistically significant. Three cytological features, namely nuclear enlargement, higher nuclear‐to‐cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio, and presence of small cell clusters, were statistically more prevalent in LGPUC compared to benign cases, although the changes were relatively subtle. In contrast, cytomorphological distinction between LGPUC and HGPUC was evident, as high cellularity, nuclear enlargement, hyperchromasia, high N/C ratio, irregular nuclear membrane, and apoptosis were significantly more prevalent in HGPUC cases. Conclusions Several cytomorphologic features in voided urine samples were more prevalent in cases with LGPUC, albeit not observed in all instances. Since these alterations were relatively subtle, meticulous attention to these cytomorphologic details is crucial to suggest the possibility of LGPUC.

Pitfalls in Urinary Tract Cytopathology

Implementation of The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology improves diagnostic accuracy of selective upper urinary tract cytology

The Paris System for Urine Cytology in Upper Tract Urothelial Specimens: A Comparative Analysis with Biopsy and Surgical Resection

Diagnostic Accuracy of the Second Edition of the Paris System for Reporting High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma in Urinary Cytology

Case Series of Thermal Cautery Artifact in Urine Cytology: An Uncommon Finding but a Potential Pitfall

A comparison between conventional and the Paris systems of reporting urinary cytopathology with a literature update

Application of The Paris System in neobladder washing cytology: Comparison between the original diagnosis and correlation with histopathology

Utility of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology in patients with HPV‐positive urinary tract carcinoma

Urine cytology suspicious for urothelial carcinoma: Prospective follow-up of cases using cytology and urine biomarker-based ancillary techniques

[Urinary cytology for the detection of urothelial lesions]

URINE CYTOLOGY AND AXILLARY TESTING FOR INTERPRETATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF URINARY TUMORS

Cytomorphological characteristics of low‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma in voided urine samples: Distinction from benign and high‐grade papillary urothelial carcinoma

Utility of The Paris System (TPS) for upper urinary tract cytopathology: correlation with histology follow-up and UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis

Comparison of urinary cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the detection of urothelial neoplasia: An analysis of discordant results

Pitfalls in Gynecological Cytology: Review of the Common and Less Frequent Entities in Pap Test

Pitfalls in Respiratory Tract Cytopathology

Does subdivision of the "atypical" urine cytology increase predictive accuracy for urothelial carcinoma?

The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology

Quest to develop a standard screening method for urothelial carcinoma using liquid-based cytology (The Paris System) and CK20

A Comparative Study of the Paris System and Common Reporting System for Urine Cytology With Cyto‐Histology Correlation: A Study of 829 Urine Cytology Specimens

Reproducibility of the Paris System in Urine Cytology by Third-Year Pathology Residents