Parental participation in neonatal heel lance pain management

Brian J. Morris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-24-189

2024-09-02

Translational Pediatrics

Abstract:Brian J. Morris School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia Comment on: Hauck AGV, van der Vaart M, Adams E, et al . Effect of parental touch on relieving acute procedural pain in neonates and parental anxiety (Petal): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in the UK. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2024;8:259-69. Keywords: Surgical pain; circumcision; neonatal care; analgesia; psychology Submitted May 17, 2024. Accepted for publication Aug 09, 2024. Published online Aug 28, 2024. doi: 10.21037/tp-24-189 Soon after birth infants may undergo medical procedures necessary for their wellbeing. Some of these may be painful. One such is collection of a small blood sample by heel lance skin laceration, often called a heel prick. The desire to minimize pain is important. The use of various non-pharmacological approaches for babies is desirable. These can involve the soothing effect of skin-to-skin contact such as massage and the use of swaddling. However, the mechanisms responsible for the analgesic effect of these interventions are not well understood. This article discusses the findings and implications of a recent British study by Hauck et al. to test whether gentle leg stroking ameliorated the expected pain induced by heel lance (a noxious stimulus) as compared with standard care in neonates (i.e., babies aged 0–4 weeks) (1). It then went on to discuss neural mechanisms involved in pain in neonates. The authors cite two independent pilot studies that found when a trained researcher stroked the skin of babies with a calibrated brush at approximately 3 cm per second before the heel lance, there was an approximately 40% reduction in activity of brain regions that respond to noxious stimuli (2,3). Hauck et al. wanted to test whether a similar intervention, but instead that involved parents stroking their neonate, would have the same effect. The authors conducted a multicentre, randomized, two-arm, parallel, controlled, superiority trial—the Parental Touch Trial (Petal)—in which parents stroked their baby for 10 seconds at a speed of approximately 3 cm per second, which was regarded as optimal for activation of C-tactile nerve fibres. The latter are unmyelinated slow conducting afferent fibres present in skin with hair (4,5). These fibers encode the affective dimensions of touch (4). The optimum response of C-fibers is achieved by gentle touch in a caressing motion. The optimal range of gentle touch that C-fibers respond to is 1–10 cm/s at skin temperature (6). It is known that adults perceive stroking at this speed as pleasant (6-9). Based on self-report, skin stroking is able to decrease pain and diminish clinically determined brain activity (7-9). In infants, such stroking has a calming effect based on its ability to slow heart rate (10-12). Since watching a painful procedure could cause anxiety and distress to parents (13), parental anxiety was evaluated as a secondary outcome. Two centres were involved—the John Radcliff Hospital in Oxford and the Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital. Selection criteria included birth at ≥35 weeks of gestational age, being less than 8 days old at the time of the intervention and needing to have a heel lance for blood collection and testing. Neonates with adverse clinical conditions, neurodevelopmental impairments, any who had been administered with analgesics or sedatives in the 24 hours preceding the study or born to a mother with a history of mood-altering substances use were excluded. The study recruited 112 neonates. These underwent rigorous 1:1 randomization into two equal groups—intervention and control—that were matched for gestational age at birth, postnatal age at study, sex, demographic similarity, and primary reason for blood collection. The primary outcome involved noxious-evoked brain activity measured by a noxious-neurodynamic response function (n-NRF) in which a fix-shaped waveform was fitted to each neonate's electroencephalogram (EEG) record. n-NRF was measured 400–700 milliseconds after stimulation. In the intervention group, the parental tactile stimulation was applied before the heel lance procedure and in the control groups, the same stimulation was applied at least 30 seconds after the heel lance procedure. Blood collection took place at least 30 seconds after the heel lance. The slight delay was to ensure blood collection did not affect the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R) (14) score. Vital signs were measured continuously from half an hour prior to the procedure to half an hour after by electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry. Neonatal EEG recording at 8 standard sites on the scalp began 10 minutes before and ended 10 minutes after the heel lance. Comfort measures such as swaddling and non-nutritive suckling were offered to all neonates. Before the heel lance, a sham heel lance using the back of the blade was applied t -Abstract Truncated-

pediatrics