[Electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis of primary biliary cirrhosis serums].

O. Albano,N. Papanicolaou,D. Buffe,J. Caroli,P. Burtin

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Strengthening resilience potential assessments for coral reef management

Mishal Gudka,David Obura,Eric A. Treml,Emily Nicholson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14303

2024-02-23

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:The persistence of diverse yet threatened ecosystems like coral reefs will require urgent action underpinned by effective assessments of resilience. Resilience potential assessments are commonly used to identify coral reefs likely to be more resilient to disturbances, based on indicators of state and function. Assessments are intended to support decision‐making, therefore, using principles from decision‐science and indicator design theory, we evaluated the selection, design and analysis of indicators from 68 resilience potential assessments conducted between 2008 and 2022. These principles include justifying and testing indicators and aggregation approaches, representing key parts of the ecosystem, considering uncertainty and meaningful normalisation of indicators. Although a broad range of indicators were typically evaluated, assessments rarely present structured processes to guide and justify indicator selection, such as selection criteria and conceptual models of ecosystem function. We also found that certain key ecosystem components that confer resilience were represented by indicators in almost all assessments, such as corals, herbivory, competition and reef structure. Other factors were rarely considered, such as abundance and diversity of key fish trophic groups other than herbivores, for example groupers and corallivores, other aspects of biodiversity and competitive interactions with corals. Reference points used to translate variables into resilience indicators were typically derived from the data, such as the highest indicator value of assessed sites. Ecologically meaningful thresholds, such as collapse or historic levels, were used less often as references. In most cases, indicators were not tested or validated against independent data, uncertainties were not presented, and there was a tendency to simplify results into composite indices to rank sites, without justifying aggregation methods. Despite resource constraints, most resilience potential assessments collect quantitative data that are useful for coral reef management. However, the shortcomings identified can make indicator interpretation difficult, limiting the capacity to predict the resilience of the system and support decisions. Implementation of robust approaches drawn from indicator design and selection theory can help strengthen resilience potential assessments of coral reefs and other ecosystems, ultimately improving the prospects of conservation.

ecology
The long-lasting now: disorganization in subjective time in long-standing pain.

C. Hellström,S. Carlsson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9450.1996.TB00673.X

1996-12-01

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Abstract:This paper presents a phenomenological-hermeneutical case study on long-standing pain (LP), a public health problem of great importance. Although there has been intensive research interest in this phenomenon, most studies have been based on traditional medical and cognitive-behavioral approaches. Our thesis is that new frames of reference can provide additional heuristic insights. The phenomenon of LP shows a strong association with existential factors. Our case study focuses on the meaning-structure of lived temporality, a fundamental existential constituent in the lifeworld of the pain patient. A series of in-depth interviews with four subjects showed that lived temporality is disrupted in pain experience, causing a disorganization of the patient's being in the world. The results generate several hypotheses about implications for time estimation in pain experience.
Assessing spatiotemporal change in coral reef social-ecological systems

Tarsha Eason,Ahjond Garmestani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/es-15116-290221

Abstract:Coral reef resilience is eroding at multiple spatial scales globally, with broad implications for coastal communities, and is thus a critical challenge for managing marine social-ecological systems (SESs). Many researchers believe that external stressors will cause key coral reefs to die by the end of the 21st century, virtually eliminating essential ecological and societal benefits. Here, we propose the use of resilience-based approaches to understand the dynamics of coral reef SESs and subsequent drivers of coral reef decline. Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of these methods, not only for tracking environmental change, but also for providing warning in advance of transitions, possibly allowing time for management interventions. The flexibility and utility of these methods make them ideal for assessing complex systems; however, they have not been used to study aquatic ecosystem dynamics at the global scale. Here, we evaluate these methods for examining spatiotemporal change in coral reef SESs across the global seascape and assess the subsequent impacts on coral reef resilience. We found that while univariate indicators failed to provide clear signals, multivariate resilience-based approaches effectively captured coral reef SES dynamics, unveiling distinctive patterns of variation throughout the global coral reef seascape. Additionally, our findings highlight global spatiotemporal variation, indicating patterns of degraded resilience. This degradation was reflected regionally, particularly in the Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean SESs. These results underscore the utility of resilience-based approaches in assessing environmental change in SESs, detecting spatiotemporal variation at the global and regional scales, and facilitating more effective monitoring and management of coral reef SESs.
[The call of alarm of the FAO concerning animal and human biosecurity].

J. Nau

2007-09-26

Abstract:
Interventions to help coral reefs under global change—A complex decision challenge

Kenneth R. N. Anthony,Kate J. Helmstedt,Line K. Bay,Pedro Fidelman,Karen E. Hussey,Petra Lundgren,David Mead,Ian M. McLeod,Peter J. Mumby,Maxine Newlands,Britta Schaffelke,Kerrie A. Wilson,Paul E. Hardisty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236399

IF: 3.7

2020-08-26

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Climate change is impacting coral reefs now. Recent pan-tropical bleaching events driven by unprecedented global heat waves have shifted the playing field for coral reef management and policy. While best-practice conventional management remains essential, it may no longer be enough to sustain coral reefs under continued climate change. Nor will climate change mitigation be sufficient on its own. Committed warming and projected reef decline means solutions must involve a portfolio of mitigation, best-practice conventional management and coordinated restoration and adaptation measures involving new and perhaps radical interventions, including local and regional cooling and shading, assisted coral evolution, assisted gene flow, and measures to support and enhance coral recruitment. We propose that proactive research and development to expand the reef management toolbox fast but safely, combined with expedient trialling of promising interventions is now urgently needed, whatever emissions trajectory the world follows. We discuss the challenges and opportunities of embracing new interventions in a race against time, including their risks and uncertainties. Ultimately, solutions to the climate challenge for coral reefs will require consideration of what society wants, what can be achieved technically and economically, and what opportunities we have for action in a rapidly closing window. Finding solutions that work for coral reefs and people will require exceptional levels of coordination of science, management and policy, and open engagement with society. It will also require compromise, because reefs will change under climate change despite our best interventions. We argue that being clear about society's priorities, and understanding both the opportunities and risks that come with an expanded toolset, can help us make the most of a challenging situation. We offer a conceptual model to help reef managers frame decision problems and objectives, and to guide effective strategy choices in the face of complexity and uncertainty.

multidisciplinary sciences
Confronting the coral reef crisis

D. R. Bellwood,T. P. Hughes,C. Folke,M. Nyström

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02691

IF: 64.8

2004-06-01

Nature

Abstract:The worldwide decline of coral reefs calls for an urgent reassessment of current management practices. Confronting large-scale crises requires a major scaling-up of management efforts based on an improved understanding of the ecological processes that underlie reef resilience. Managing for improved resilience, incorporating the role of human activity in shaping ecosystems, provides a basis for coping with uncertainty, future changes and ecological surprises. Here we review the ecological roles of critical functional groups (for both corals and reef fishes) that are fundamental to understanding resilience and avoiding phase shifts from coral dominance to less desirable, degraded ecosystems. We identify striking biogeographic differences in the species richness and composition of functional groups, which highlight the vulnerability of Caribbean reef ecosystems. These findings have profound implications for restoration of degraded reefs, management of fisheries, and the focus on marine protected areas and biodiversity hotspots as priorities for conservation.

multidisciplinary sciences
Ocean Acidification and Warming Will Lower Coral Reef Resilience

Ken Anthony,Jeffrey Maynard,Guillermo Díaz-Pulido,Peter J. Mumby,Paul Marshall,Long Cao,Ove Hoegh‐Guldberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02364.x

IF: 11.6

2011-01-01

Global Change Biology

Abstract:Ocean warming and acidification from increasing levels of atmospheric CO2 represent major global threats to coral reefs, and are in many regions exacerbated by local-scale disturbances such as overfishing and nutrient enrichment. Our understanding of global threats and local-scale disturbances on reefs is growing, but their relative contribution to reef resilience and vulnerability in the future is unclear. Here, we analyse quantitatively how different combinations of CO2 and fishing pressure on herbivores will affect the ecological resilience of a simplified benthic reef community, as defined by its capacity to maintain and recover to coral-dominated states. We use a dynamic community model integrated with the growth and mortality responses for branching corals (Acropora) and fleshy macroalgae (Lobophora). We operationalize the resilience framework by parameterizing the response function for coral growth (calcification) by ocean acidification and warming, coral bleaching and mortality by warming, macroalgal mortality by herbivore grazing and macroalgal growth via nutrient loading. The model was run for changes in sea surface temperature and water chemistry predicted by the rise in atmospheric CO2 projected from the IPCC's fossil-fuel intensive A1FI scenario during this century. Results demonstrated that severe acidification and warming alone can lower reef resilience (via impairment of coral growth and increased coral mortality) even under high grazing intensity and low nutrients. Further, the threshold at which herbivore overfishing (reduced grazing) leads to a coral–algal phase shift was lowered by acidification and warming. These analyses support two important conclusions: Firstly, reefs already subjected to herbivore overfishing and nutrification are likely to be more vulnerable to increasing CO2. Secondly, under CO2 regimes above 450–500 ppm, management of local-scale disturbances will become critical to keeping reefs within an Acropora-rich domain.
Managing Local Stressors for Coral Reef Condition and Ecosystem Services Delivery Under Climate Scenarios

Mariska Weijerman,Lindsay Veazey,Susan Yee,Kellie Vaché,Jade M. S. Delevaux,Mary K. Donovan,Kim Falinski,Joey Lecky,Kirsten L. L. Oleson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00425

IF: 5.247

2018-11-09

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:Coral reefs provide numerous ecosystem goods and services, but are threatened by multiple environmental and anthropogenic stressors. To identify management scenarios that will reverse or mitigate ecosystem degradation, managers can benefit from tools that can quantify projected changes in ecosystem services due to alternative management options. We used a spatially-explicit biophysical ecosystem model to evaluate socio-ecological trade-offs of land-based vs. marine-based management scenarios, and local-scale vs. global-scale stressors and their cumulative impacts. To increase the relevance of understanding ecological change for the public and decision-makers, we used four ecological production functions to translate the model outputs into the ecosystem services: "State of the Reef," "Trophic Integrity," "Fisheries Production," and "Fisheries Landings." For a case study of Maui Nui, Hawai'i, land-based management attenuated coral cover decline whereas fisheries management promoted higher total fish biomass. Placement of no-take marine protected areas (MPAs) across 30% of coral reef areas led to a reversal of the historical decline in predatory fish biomass, although this outcome depended on the spatial arrangement of MPAs. Coral cover declined less severely under strict sediment mitigation scenarios. However, the benefits of these local management scenarios were largely lost when accounting for climate-related impacts. Climate-related stressors indirectly increased herbivore biomass due to the shift from corals to algae and, hence, greater food availability. The two ecosystem services related to fish biomass increased under climate-related stressors but "Trophic Integrity" of the reef declined, indicating a less resilient reef. "State of the Reef" improved most and "Trophic Integrity" declined least under an optimistic global warming scenario and strict local management. This work provides insight into the relative influence of land-based vs. marine-based management and local vs. global stressors as drivers of changes in ecosystem dynamics while quantifying the tradeoffs between conservation- and extraction-oriented ecosystem services.

marine & freshwater biology
An Integrated Coral Reef Ecosystem Model to Support Resource Management under a Changing Climate

Mariska Weijerman,Elizabeth A Fulton,Isaac C Kaplan,Rebecca Gorton,Rik Leemans,Wolf M Mooij,Russell E Brainard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144165

IF: 3.7

2015-12-16

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Millions of people rely on the ecosystem services provided by coral reefs, but sustaining these benefits requires an understanding of how reefs and their biotic communities are affected by local human-induced disturbances and global climate change. Ecosystem-based management that explicitly considers the indirect and cumulative effects of multiple disturbances has been recommended and adopted in policies in many places around the globe. Ecosystem models give insight into complex reef dynamics and their responses to multiple disturbances and are useful tools to support planning and implementation of ecosystem-based management. We adapted the Atlantis Ecosystem Model to incorporate key dynamics for a coral reef ecosystem around Guam in the tropical western Pacific. We used this model to quantify the effects of predicted climate and ocean changes and current levels of current land-based sources of pollution (LBSP) and fishing. We used the following six ecosystem metrics as indicators of ecosystem state, resilience and harvest potential: 1) ratio of calcifying to non-calcifying benthic groups, 2) trophic level of the community, 3) biomass of apex predators, 4) biomass of herbivorous fishes, 5) total biomass of living groups and 6) the end-to-start ratio of exploited fish groups. Simulation tests of the effects of each of the three drivers separately suggest that by mid-century climate change will have the largest overall effect on this suite of ecosystem metrics due to substantial negative effects on coral cover. The effects of fishing were also important, negatively influencing five out of the six metrics. Moreover, LBSP exacerbates this effect for all metrics but not quite as badly as would be expected under additive assumptions, although the magnitude of the effects of LBSP are sensitive to uncertainty associated with primary productivity. Over longer time spans (i.e., 65 year simulations), climate change impacts have a slight positive interaction with other drivers, generally meaning that declines in ecosystem metrics are not as steep as the sum of individual effects of the drivers. These analyses offer one way to quantify impacts and interactions of particular stressors in an ecosystem context and so provide guidance to managers. For example, the model showed that improving water quality, rather than prohibiting fishing, extended the timescales over which corals can maintain high abundance by at least 5-8 years. This result, in turn, provides more scope for corals to adapt or for resilient species to become established and for local and global management efforts to reduce or reverse stressors.
The Future of Coral Reefs Subject to Rapid Climate Change: Lessons from Natural Extreme Environments

Emma F. Camp,Verena Schoepf,Peter J. Mumby,Leonardo A. Hardtke,Riccardo Rodolfo-Metalpa,David J. Smith,David J. Suggett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00004

IF: 5.247

2018-02-02

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:Global climate change and localized anthropogenic stressors are driving rapid declines in coral reef health. In vitro experiments have been fundamental in providing insight into how reef organisms will potentially respond to future climates. However, such experiments are inevitably limited in their ability to reproduce the complex interactions that govern reef systems. Studies examining coral communities that already persist under naturally-occurring extreme and marginal physicochemical conditions have therefore become increasingly popular to advance ecosystem scale predictions of future reef form and function, although no single site provides a perfect analog to future reefs. Here we review the current state of knowledge that exists on the distribution of corals in marginal and extreme environments, and geographic sites at the latitudinal extremes of reef growth, as well as a variety of shallow reef systems and reef-neighboring environments (including upwelling and CO2 vent sites). We also conduct a synthesis of the abiotic data that have been collected at these systems, to provide the first collective assessment on the range of extreme conditions under which corals currently persist. We use the review and data synthesis to increase our understanding of the biological and ecological mechanisms that facilitate survival and success under sub-optimal physicochemical conditions. This comprehensive assessment can begin to: (i) highlight the extent of extreme abiotic scenarios under which corals can persist, (ii) explore whether there are commonalities in coral taxa able to persist in such extremes, (iii) provide evidence for key mechanisms required to support survival and/or persistence under sub-optimal environmental conditions, and (iv) evaluate the potential of current sub-optimal coral environments to act as potential refugia under changing environmental conditions. Such a collective approach is critical to better understand the future survival of corals in our changing environment. We finally outline priority areas for future research on extreme and marginal coral environments, and discuss the additional management options they may provide for corals through refuge or by providing genetic stocks of stress tolerant corals to support proactive management strategies.

marine & freshwater biology
Quantifying Coral Reef Resilience to Climate Change and Human Development: An Evaluation of Multiple Empirical Frameworks

Ashley H. Y. Bang,Chao-Yang Kuo,Colin Kuo-Chang Wen,Kah-Leng Cherh,Ming-Jay Ho,Nien-Yun Cheng,Yen-Chia Chen,Chaolun Allen Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.610306

IF: 5.247

2021-01-13

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:The integrity of coral reefs has increasingly been threatened by human development and climate change. As a result, the concept of ecological resilience – an ecosystem's capability to resist and recover from environmental stressors – has become an important aspect of coral reef conservation. In this study, coral reef resilience was quantitatively scored in Kenting National Park (KNP), Taiwan, using four different assessment frameworks: the first uses the opinions of local reef experts, the second includes metrics specific to the local reef context, the third combines the previous two approaches, and the fourth relies solely on ecological metrics from biodiversity surveys. To evaluate the accuracy of each assessment, the resulting resilience scores were compared with historical coral recovery rates, which served as a proxy for resilience. While each approach to measuring resilience has its merits and drawbacks, the picture of resilience became clearest when a few key indicators were included to reflect core ecosystem processes. Trends in resilience scores varied depending on the makeup of the assessment's indicators, and there was little correlation between the baseline metrics measured using different data collection methods. However, all resilience assessment trends indicated that KNP's Nanwan area is high in resilience. This is likely due to the effects of local tidally-induced upwelling, which significantly relieve the growing thermal stress placed on surrounding coral communities. Ultimately, the most successful assessments were those that empirically quantified ecological processes and local factors with only a few indicators, rather than broader approaches that measured many indicators. These findings are particularly relevant for reef managers to consider as they develop and employ resilience-based management strategies.

marine & freshwater biology
Coupling marine ecosystem state with environmental management and conservation: A risk-based approach

Rebecca V. Gladstone-Gallagher,Judi E. Hewitt,Jasmine M.L. Low,Conrad A. Pilditch,Fabrice Stephenson,Simon F. Thrush,Joanne I. Ellis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110516

IF: 7.499

2024-04-01

Biological Conservation

Abstract:The sustainability of marine ecosystems demands a focus on ecological improvement, necessitating managers and conservationists to consider a range of actions from those that limit stressors to those that actively restore. Deciding the most appropriate action should be informed by environmental context, which includes assessing information on both degradation and recovery potential. Here, we provide an analysis of how the degree of ecological degradation coupled with the stressor regime can inform environmental management and conservation actions (e.g., stressor reductions, adaptive management, assisted recovery/restoration). With this analysis we design a risk framework combining principles that define ecosystem resilience and recovery times with those that characterize stressor regimes (i.e., the number, type, and impact). The combination of these principles defines where an ecosystem is placed along sliding scales of degradation and recovery and likely response to protective and restorative interventions. It is designed to facilitate place-based conversations regarding the risks of different management actions informed by the temporal dynamics of ecosystem degradation and recovery.

environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
Coral reefs benefit from reduced land–sea impacts under ocean warming

Jamison M. Gove,Gareth J. Williams,Joey Lecky,Eric Brown,Eric Conklin,Chelsie Counsell,Gerald Davis,Mary K. Donovan,Kim Falinski,Lindsey Kramer,Kelly Kozar,Ning Li,Jeffrey A. Maynard,Amanda McCutcheon,Sheila A. McKenna,Brian J. Neilson,Aryan Safaie,Christopher Teague,Robert Whittier,Gregory P. Asner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06394-w

IF: 64.8

2023-08-10

Nature

Abstract:Coral reef ecosystems are being fundamentally restructured by local human impacts and climate-driven marine heatwaves that trigger mass coral bleaching and mortality 1 . Reducing local impacts can increase reef resistance to and recovery from bleaching 2 . However, resource managers lack clear advice on targeted actions that best support coral reefs under climate change 3 and sector-based governance means most land- and sea-based management efforts remain siloed 4 . Here we combine surveys of reef change with a unique 20-year time series of land–sea human impacts that encompassed an unprecedented marine heatwave in Hawai'i. Reefs with increased herbivorous fish populations and reduced land-based impacts, such as wastewater pollution and urban runoff, had positive coral cover trajectories predisturbance. These reefs also experienced a modest reduction in coral mortality following severe heat stress compared to reefs with reduced fish populations and enhanced land-based impacts. Scenario modelling indicated that simultaneously reducing land–sea human impacts results in a three- to sixfold greater probability of a reef having high reef-builder cover four years postdisturbance than if either occurred in isolation. International efforts to protect 30% of Earth's land and ocean ecosystems by 2030 are underway 5 . Our results reveal that integrated land–sea management could help achieve coastal ocean conservation goals and provide coral reefs with the best opportunity to persist in our changing climate.

multidisciplinary sciences
Climate Change, Coral Loss, and the Curious Case of the Parrotfish Paradigm: Why Don't Marine Protected Areas Improve Reef Resilience?

John F Bruno,Isabelle M Côté,Lauren T Toth,John F. Bruno,Isabelle M. Côté,Lauren T. Toth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010318-095300

IF: 16.561

2019-01-03

Annual Review of Marine Science

Abstract:Scientists have advocated for local interventions, such as creating marine protected areas and implementing fishery restrictions, as ways to mitigate local stressors to limit the effects of climate change on reef-building corals. However, in a literature review, we find little empirical support for the notion of managed resilience. We outline some reasons for why marine protected areas and the protection of herbivorous fish (especially parrotfish) have had little effect on coral resilience. One key explanation is that the impacts of local stressors (e.g., pollution and fishing) are often swamped by the much greater effect of ocean warming on corals. Another is the sheer complexity (including numerous context dependencies) of the five cascading links assumed by the managed-resilience hypothesis. If reefs cannot be saved by local actions alone, then it is time to face reef degradation head-on, by directly addressing anthropogenic climate change—the root cause of global coral decline.

geochemistry & geophysics,marine & freshwater biology,oceanography
From polyps to pixels: understanding coral reef resilience to local and global change across scales

Mary K. Donovan,Catherine Alves,John Burns,Crawford Drury,Ouida W. Meier,Raphael Ritson-Williams,Ross Cunning,Robert P. Dunn,Gretchen Goodbody-Gringley,Leslie M. Henderson,Ingrid S. S. Knapp,Joshua Levy,Cheryl A. Logan,Laura Mudge,Chris Sullivan,Ruth D. Gates,Gregory P. Asner,Donovan, Mary K.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01463-3

IF: 5.043

2022-07-01

Landscape Ecology

Abstract:Coral reef resilience is the product of multiple interacting processes that occur across various interacting scales. This complexity presents challenges for identifying solutions to the ongoing worldwide decline of coral reef ecosystems that are threatened by both local and global human stressors.

ecology,geography, physical,geosciences, multidisciplinary
Identifying management opportunities to combat climate, land, and marine threats across less climate exposed coral reefs

Caitlin D. Kuempel,Vivitskaia J. D. Tulloch,Alyssa L. Giffin,B. Alexander Simmons,Valerie Hagger,Carol Phua,Ove Hoegh‐Guldberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13856

IF: 7.563

2021-12-14

Conservation Biology

Abstract:Conserving coral reefs is critical for maintaining marine biodiversity, protecting coastlines, and supporting livelihoods in many coastal communities. Climate change threatens coral reefs globally, but researchers have identified a portfolio of coral reefs (bioclimatic units [BCUs]) that are relatively less exposed to climate impacts and strongly connected to other coral reef systems. These reefs provide a proactive opportunity to secure a long-term future for coral reefs under climate change. To help guide local management efforts, we quantified marine cumulative human impact (CHI) from climate, marine, and land pressures (2013 and from 2008 to 2013) in BCUs and across countries tasked with BCU management. Additionally, we created a management index based on common management measures and policies for each pressure source (climate, marine, and land) to identify a country's intent and commitment to effectively manage these pressures. Twenty-two countries (79%) had increases in CHI from 2008 to 2013. Climate change pressures had the highest proportional contribution to CHI across all reefs and in all but one country (Singapore), but 18 BCUs (35%) and nine countries containing BCUs (32%) had relatively high land and marine impacts. There was a significant positive relationship between climate impact and the climate management index across countries (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.43, p = 0.02), potentially signifying that countries with greater climate impacts are more committed to managing them. However, this trend was driven by climate management intent in Fiji and Bangladesh. Our results can be used to guide future fine-scale analyses, national policies, and local management decisions, and our management indices reveal areas where management components can be improved. Cost-effectively managing local pressures (e.g., fishing and nutrients) in BCUs is essential for building a climate-ready future that benefits coral reefs and people.

environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
Social–environmental drivers inform strategic management of coral reefs in the Anthropocene

Emily S. Darling,Tim R. McClanahan,Joseph Maina,Georgina G. Gurney,Nicholas A. J. Graham,Fraser Januchowski-Hartley,Joshua E. Cinner,Camilo Mora,Christina C. Hicks,Eva Maire,Marji Puotinen,William J. Skirving,Mehdi Adjeroud,Gabby Ahmadia,Rohan Arthur,Andrew G. Bauman,Maria Beger,Michael L. Berumen,Lionel Bigot,Jessica Bouwmeester,Ambroise Brenier,Tom C. L. Bridge,Eric Brown,Stuart J. Campbell,Sara Cannon,Bruce Cauvin,Chaolun Allen Chen,Joachim Claudet,Vianney Denis,Simon Donner,Estradivari,Nur Fadli,David A. Feary,Douglas Fenner,Helen Fox,Erik C. Franklin,Alan Friedlander,James Gilmour,Claire Goiran,James Guest,Jean-Paul A. Hobbs,Andrew S. Hoey,Peter Houk,Steven Johnson,Stacy D. Jupiter,Mohsen Kayal,Chao-yang Kuo,Joleah Lamb,Michelle A. C. Lee,Jeffrey Low,Nyawira Muthiga,Efin Muttaqin,Yashika Nand,Kirsty L. Nash,Osamu Nedlic,John M. Pandolfi,Shinta Pardede,Vardhan Patankar,Lucie Penin,Lauriane Ribas-Deulofeu,Zoe Richards,T. Edward Roberts,Ku’ulei S. Rodgers,Che Din Mohd Safuan,Enric Sala,George Shedrawi,Tsai Min Sin,Patrick Smallhorn-West,Jennifer E. Smith,Brigitte Sommer,Peter D. Steinberg,Makamas Sutthacheep,Chun Hong James Tan,Gareth J. Williams,Shaun Wilson,Thamasak Yeemin,John F. Bruno,Marie-Josée Fortin,Martin Krkosek,David Mouillot

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0953-8

2019-08-12

Abstract:Without drastic efforts to reduce carbon emissions and mitigate globalized stressors, tropical coral reefs are in jeopardy. Strategic conservation and management requires identification of the environmental and socioeconomic factors driving the persistence of scleractinian coral assemblages—the foundation species of coral reef ecosystems. Here, we compiled coral abundance data from 2,584 Indo-Pacific reefs to evaluate the influence of 21 climate, social and environmental drivers on the ecology of reef coral assemblages. Higher abundances of framework-building corals were typically associated with: weaker thermal disturbances and longer intervals for potential recovery; slower human population growth; reduced access by human settlements and markets; and less nearby agriculture. We therefore propose a framework of three management strategies (protect, recover or transform) by considering: (1) if reefs were above or below a proposed threshold of >10% cover of the coral taxa important for structural complexity and carbonate production; and (2) reef exposure to severe thermal stress during the 2014–2017 global coral bleaching event. Our findings can guide urgent management efforts for coral reefs, by identifying key threats across multiple scales and strategic policy priorities that might sustain a network of functioning reefs in the Indo-Pacific to avoid ecosystem collapse.

ecology,evolutionary biology
How changes projected by climate models can inform climate adaptation and marine sanctuary management: A collaborative prototype methodology

Daniel Morris,Deepak Cherian,Frederic Castruccio,Joanie Kleypas,Kristen Krumhardt,Melissa Moulton,Ryan D Williamson,Sarah Zohdy,Kelly Dunning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121953

Abstract:Coral reefs are highly important ecosystems providing habitat for biodiverse marine life and numerous benefits for humans. However they face immense risks from climate change. To date, Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) climate models have aided global discussions on possible policy responses to adapt to change, but tailored climate projections at a useful scale for environmental managers are often prohibitively expensive to produce. Our research addresses this problem by presenting a novel type of collaborative, participatory research that integrates 1) site specific climate metrics from the Community Earth System Model version 2 large ensemble (CESM2-LE), 2) ecosystem response models to determine Degree Heating Months and coral bleaching impacts, and 3) collaborative social science data from environmental manager engagement to see how managers in one of the most visited marine sanctuaries in the world are enacting adaptive governance, stewarding reefs through climate impacts of the future. Our research is valuable to decision-makers seeking opportunities for innovative policy responses to climate impacts focused on experimentation and dialogue.
Ecosystem Pushing: Coral Restoration in Refugia as an Unexplored Answer to Climate Change Adaptation

Edith Maria Mertz,Anne McDonald

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/809/1/012011

2021-07-01

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

Abstract:Abstract Climate change is driving ecosystem change across the biosphere on an unprecedented scale. Large biogeographic shifts are underway as habitats move their ranges towards the poles in an attempt to remain in zones that adhere to organisms’ preferred temperature ranges. These new areas of shifting climatic ranges, or refugia, represent important opportunities for the future survival of countless species in a warming world. However, many species may have colonisation rates too slow to keep up with climate change. This may be due to barriers to dispersal, long time periods in reproductive cycles, survival and viability of offspring, geographic isolation of suitable new habitats, stochasticity and other environmental factors. Ecosystem pushing proposes to propagate species into refugia using restoration techniques with the aim of supporting species survival and ecosystem conservation. This paper proposes ecosystem pushing as a new management intervention for the field of coral reef restoration. Management considerations will need to include geographic models of refugia projections to ascertain appropriate locations for restoration work. Other important considerations would include assessing the risks of losing one ecosystem type for another, invasive species and disease introductions, issues of intervention scale and time constraints, and levels of stakeholder engagement with local communities.
Coral Reef Monitoring, Reef Assessment Technologies, and Ecosystem-Based Management

David O. Obura,Greta Aeby,Natchanon Amornthammarong,Ward Appeltans,Nicholas Bax,Joe Bishop,Russell E. Brainard,Samuel Chan,Pamela Fletcher,Timothy A. C. Gordon,Lew Gramer,Mishal Gudka,John Halas,James Hendee,Gregor Hodgson,Danwei Huang,Mike Jankulak,Albert Jones,Tadashi Kimura,Joshua Levy,Patricia Miloslavich,Loke Ming Chou,Frank Muller-Karger,Kennedy Osuka,Melita Samoilys,Stephen D. Simpson,Karenne Tun,Supin Wongbusarakum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00580

IF: 5.247

2019-09-19

Frontiers in Marine Science

Abstract:Coral reefs are exceptionally biodiverse and human dependence on their ecosystem services is high. Reefs experience significant direct and indirect anthropogenic pressures, and provide a sensitive indicator of coastal ocean health, climate change, and ocean acidification, with associated implications for society. Monitoring coral reef status and trends is essential to better inform science, management and policy, but the projected collapse of reef systems within a few decades makes the provision of accurate and actionable monitoring data urgent. The Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network has been the foundation for global reporting on coral reefs for two decades, and is entering into a new phase with improved operational and data standards incorporating the Essential Ocean Variables (EOVs) (<a href="http://www.goosocean.org/eov">www.goosocean.org/eov</a>) and Framework for Ocean Observing developed by the Global Ocean Observing System. Three EOVs provide a robust description of reef health: hard coral cover and composition, macro-algal canopy cover, and fish diversity and abundance. A data quality model based on comprehensive metadata has been designed to facilitate maximum global coverage of coral reef data, and tangible steps to track capacity building. Improved monitoring of events such as mass bleaching and disease outbreaks, citizen science, and socio-economic monitoring have the potential to greatly improve the relevance of monitoring to managers and stakeholders, and to address the complex and multi- dimensional interactions between reefs and people. A new generation of autonomous vehicles (underwater, surface, and aerial) and satellites are set to revolutionize and vastly expand our understanding of coral reefs. Promising approaches include Structure from Motion image processing, and acoustic techniques. Across all systems, curation of data in linked and open online databases, with an open data culture to maximize benefits from data integration, and empowering users to take action, are priorities. Action in the next decade will be essential to mitigate the impacts on coral reefs from warming temperatures, through local management and informing national and international obligations, particularly in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals, climate action, and the role of coral reefs as a global indicator. Mobilizing data to help drive the needed behavior change is a top priority for coral reef observing systems.

marine & freshwater biology

[Electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis of primary biliary cirrhosis serums].

Strengthening resilience potential assessments for coral reef management

The long-lasting now: disorganization in subjective time in long-standing pain.

Assessing spatiotemporal change in coral reef social-ecological systems

[The call of alarm of the FAO concerning animal and human biosecurity].

Interventions to help coral reefs under global change—A complex decision challenge

Confronting the coral reef crisis

Ocean Acidification and Warming Will Lower Coral Reef Resilience

Managing Local Stressors for Coral Reef Condition and Ecosystem Services Delivery Under Climate Scenarios

An Integrated Coral Reef Ecosystem Model to Support Resource Management under a Changing Climate

The Future of Coral Reefs Subject to Rapid Climate Change: Lessons from Natural Extreme Environments

Quantifying Coral Reef Resilience to Climate Change and Human Development: An Evaluation of Multiple Empirical Frameworks

Coupling marine ecosystem state with environmental management and conservation: A risk-based approach

Coral reefs benefit from reduced land–sea impacts under ocean warming

Climate Change, Coral Loss, and the Curious Case of the Parrotfish Paradigm: Why Don't Marine Protected Areas Improve Reef Resilience?

From polyps to pixels: understanding coral reef resilience to local and global change across scales

Identifying management opportunities to combat climate, land, and marine threats across less climate exposed coral reefs

Social–environmental drivers inform strategic management of coral reefs in the Anthropocene

How changes projected by climate models can inform climate adaptation and marine sanctuary management: A collaborative prototype methodology

Ecosystem Pushing: Coral Restoration in Refugia as an Unexplored Answer to Climate Change Adaptation

Coral Reef Monitoring, Reef Assessment Technologies, and Ecosystem-Based Management