Balkan Epic Cyclicity: A View from the Languages

V. Friedman
Abstract:One way to approach Balkan epic is through the languages in which they are sung or recited. It is interesting to note that in this regard, the geographical extent of Balkan epics and of Balkan languages—in the sense of the Balkan Sprachbund, or linguistic league—are not exactly co–terminous, but rather show interesting similarities and differences.1 In this afterward, then, I would like to examine the topic of this volume as a linguist and Balkanist with almost forty years of field experience in the region and interests that have extended beyond the realm of grammar sensu stricto. Lord (1972:305–308) has identified the stylistic importance of Turkish lexicon in Balkan epic—not unlike the importance of Turkish lexicon in the Balkan languages (Kazazis 1972, Friedman 1996a). This is an area where standardization functions like literacy (with which it is deeply entwined) in opposition to orality (and the dialects that are its vehicle). As with the standardization of the modern Balkan literary languages (except post-Yugoslav Bosnian), so, too, in the deployment of epic for representing the nation, Turkish is pushed back (historically), down (stylistically), or out (via replacement). And yet, without Turkish (and, Lord 1972 argues, Islam), an element of epic authenticity is lost. Consider in this regard Notopoulos' (1959, 1) attempt to create a seamless connection between Homeric epic through Byzantium to Modern Greek epic by passing over the crucial Ottoman period in silence:
What problem does this paper attempt to address?