Abstract:Cement manufacturing, a fundamental process industry characterized by high CO2 emissions, sees over 58% of its emissions stemming from the limestone calcination process. However, this significant source of CO2 has not yet been adequately addressed by most existing cement decarbonization processes. As such, systematic environmental and economic comparisons between different cement processes are essential. This paper proposes a new cement process (NCP) that uses natural gas to react with limestone to reduce CO2 emissions and simultaneously produce high-value-added chemical products (methanol). To explore strategies for further improving the performance of the CO2 emission reduction, two processes are developed, integrating the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) and carbon capture and storage (CCS) units with the traditional cement process (TCP) and the NCP, namely TCP-ORC-CCS and NCP-ORC-CCS respectively. Life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic analysis were performed on the TCP, NCP, TCP-ORC-CCS, and NCP-ORC-CCS processes, revealing their advantages and limitations in different scenarios. LCA adopts the "cradle to gate" system boundary, which includes the whole cement process from ore mining to clinker generation and other processes used for carbon reduction. The LCA results show that four cement processes exhibit different environmental performances when choosing different allocation methods. Under economic allocation, the global warming potential (GWP) of TCP, NCP, TCP-ORC-CCS, and NCP-ORC-CCS are 933, 300, 432, and 194 kgCO2eq/ton·clinker, respectively. The comprehensive analysis indicates that NCP has the best comprehensive economic and environmental performance when natural gas and methanol prices are 332 and 319 $/ton, respectively. The price fluctuation of natural gas and methanol is found to greatly impact the levelized cost of clinker (LCOC) of NCP through sensitivity analysis. NCP is economically preferred over TCP when the price of methanol (MeOH) is at least $76 above approximately two-thirds of the price of methane (CH4). Similarly, NCP-ORC-CCS is more advantageous than TCP-ORC-CCS when the price of MeOH is at least $87 above nearly two-thirds of the price of CH4. This study provides a comprehensive analysis for low-carbon cement process design to achieve CO2 emissions reduction.

Cement Industry Readiness Check for Upgraded Environmental Regulations: Final Actions to Implement the Latest MACT, NSPS, and Alternative Fuel Requirements

Cement Manufacture and the Environment Part II: Environmental Challenges and Opportunities

Cement Manufacture and the Environment: Part I: Chemistry and Technology

Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry

Recent Progress in Green Cement Technology Utilizing Low-Carbon Emission Fuels and Raw Materials: A Review

Conceptual Design and Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Assessment of Low-Carbon Cement Manufacturing Processes

Assessment of fuel switching as a decarbonization strategy in the cement sector

Low-carbon Cementitious Materials: Scale-up Potential, Environmental Impact and Barriers

A review of waste products utilized as supplements to Portland cement in concrete

Sustainable cement production—present and future

Comparative environmental assessment of limestone calcined clay cements and typical blended cements

Mitigation Of Climate Change By Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions In Cement Industry

Co-processing of Raw and Washed Air Pollution Control Residues from Energy-from-waste Facilities in the Cement Kiln

Impacts of EPA Power Plant Emissions Regulations on the US Electricity Sector

Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries

Greening Cement in China: A Cost-Effective Roadmap

Plant-level Green Transformation Strategy in China’s Cement Industry: Considering Energy Conservation and Emission Reduction Co-Benefits

Alternative Clinker Technologies for Reducing Carbon Emissions in Cement Industry: A Critical Review

Carbon Capture in the Cement Industry: Technologies, Progress, and Retrofitting

Cement industry – Associated emissions, environmental issues and measures for the control of the emissions

Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Concrete by Expanding the Use of Supplementary Cementitious Materials