Identification of Psychosis Risk and Diagnosis of First-Episode Psychosis: Advice for Clinicians
Nancy B Lundin,Alexandra M Blouin,Henry R Cowan,Aubrey M Moe,Heather M Wastler,Nicholas J K Breitborde
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s423865
IF: 3.974
2024-03-22
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Nancy B Lundin, 1 Alexandra M Blouin, 1 Henry R Cowan, 1, 2 Aubrey M Moe, 1, 3 Heather M Wastler, 1 Nicholas JK Breitborde 1, 3 1 Early Psychosis Intervention Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; 2 Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA; 3 Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA Correspondence: Nancy B Lundin, Early Psychosis Intervention Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, 1670 Upham Drive, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA, Tel +1 614 293 6361, Email Early detection of psychotic-spectrum disorders among adolescents and young adults is crucial, as the initial years after psychotic symptom onset encompass a critical period in which psychosocial and pharmacological interventions are most effective. Moreover, clinicians and researchers in recent decades have thoroughly characterized psychosis-risk syndromes, in which youth are experiencing early warning signs indicative of heightened risk for developing a psychotic disorder. These insights have created opportunities for intervention even earlier in the illness course, ideally culminating in the prevention or mitigation of psychosis onset. However, identification and diagnosis of early signs of psychosis can be complex, as clinical presentations are heterogeneous, and psychotic symptoms exist on a continuum. When a young person presents to a clinic, it may be unclear whether they are experiencing common, mild psychotic-like symptoms, early warning signs of psychosis, overt psychotic symptoms, or symptoms better accounted for by a non-psychotic disorder. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to provide a framework for clinicians, including those who treat non-psychotic disorders and those in primary care settings, for guiding identification and diagnosis of early psychosis within the presenting clinic or via referral to a specialty clinic. We first provide descriptions and examples of first-episode psychosis (FEP) and psychosis-risk syndromes, as well as assessment tools used to diagnose these conditions. Next, we provide guidance as to the differential diagnosis of conditions which have phenotypic overlap with psychotic disorders, while considering the possibility of co-occurring symptoms in which case transdiagnostic treatments are encouraged. Finally, we conclude with an overview of early detection screening and outreach campaigns, which should be further optimized to reduce the duration of untreated psychosis among youth. Keywords: diagnostic assessment, early detection, recent-onset psychosis, clinical high risk for psychosis, psychosis continuum Psychotic-spectrum disorders such as schizophrenia have been recognized globally as among the most severe and debilitating health conditions that humans can experience. 1,2 Psychotic symptoms consist of positive symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions, negative symptoms such as diminished emotional expression and motivation, and disorganized symptoms such as incoherent speech and atypical behavior, and are often accompanied by disturbances in functioning, cognition, motor skills, and one's basic sense of self. 3–5 Symptom onset typically occurs from late adolescence to one's early twenties, an important developmental period referred to as emerging adulthood. 6 The onset of psychotic illness during emerging adulthood can lead to tremendous disruptions in key developmental milestones such as the formation and maintenance of meaningful interpersonal relationships, pursuit of educational and career aspirations, and exploration of personal identity and independence. 7 Importantly, research has shown that these functional disruptions unfold rapidly within the first few years following onset of psychotic illness. 8–10 Moreover, longer duration of untreated psychosis (i.e., the delay between onset of psychotic symptoms and receipt of adequate mental health care) has been repeatedly shown to relate to poorer outcomes, including increased psychotic symptom severity, suicide risk, and criminal justice involvement, reduced quality of life, social functioning impairment, and lower likelihood of remission and treatment response. 11–15 Finally, the initial years following onset of psychotic symptoms may represent a critical period for intervention, during which pharmacological and psychosocial treatments elicit the greatest treatment response. 16 Therefore, intervention for youth early in the course of psychotic illness can be critical for improving chances of recovery. Intervening among youth showing initial signs of psychosis is crucial, yet these signs ca -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary