Abstract:Background/Introduction The treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) with pulsed field ablation (PFA) aims to prevent AF recurrence while reducing complications from the ablation modality. Similar to thermal ablation, PFA has proven to be safe and effective for treatment of paroxysmal AF (PAF); however, there is scarce evidence on patient-related clinical benefits, including healthcare utilization, using this new energy modality. Purpose The objective of this study is to assess long-term clinical improvements in patient care, symptoms, and quality-of-life (QOL) after PFA ablation in PAF. Methods InspIRE was a multicentre study evaluating the safety and efficacy of variable loop PFA catheters integrated with a 3D mapping system for treatment of symptomatic PAF. Patients were followed for up to 12 months for the following QOL and healthcare utilization endpoints: Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) score, Class I/III AAD utilization, repeat ablation, incidence of direct current cardioversion (DCCV), and cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization. Post-hoc Kaplan-Meier estimates for clinical benefit success at 12 months were provided. Success was defined as composite freedom from occurrence of the following events post-blanking: repeat ablation, CV hospitalization, AAD utilization, and DCCV post-blanking. Predictors of clinical benefit success were explored via multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 186 enrolled patients (59±10 years; 70.0% male; CHA2DS2-VASC score 1.3±1.2) underwent PVI. Compared to baseline: 1) improvements in the AFEQT composite score were seen at 12 months (P<0.001); 2) Class I/III AAD use was reduced from 81.7% to 20.1% at 6-12 months (P<0.05); and 3) the proportion of subjects with DCCV decreased from 13.7% up to 12 months before the index procedure to 3.3% up to 12 months after the index procedure (P<0.001, Figure 1). Minimal clinically important difference in QoL (≥5 points improvement in AFEQT) was achieved in 85.2% of patients. Patients free from 12-month AF/AT/AFL recurrence (asymptomatic and symptomatic) had significantly greater improvements in AFEQT scores from baseline to 12 months versus those with recurrence (P=0.01). The clinical benefit success rate at 12 months was 87.5% (Figure 2). Patients who failed the clinical benefit endpoint were counted, including those with repeat ablation (7.5%), those on new or higher dose of AAD (6.5%), those hospitalized for CV (4.8%), and those who had DCCV post-blanking (1.6%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that left ventricle ejection fraction <60% (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08-0.62; P<0.05) and incidence of diabetes (OR: 7.25; 95% CI: 2.00, 26.3; p<0.05) were associated with a higher risk of clinical benefit failure. Conclusions PFA ablation of PAF patients led to a clinical benefit success rate of 87.5%, with clinically meaningful improvement in QOL, as well as a reductions in AAD use, cardioversion, and hospitalization.Figure 1.Improvements in QoL and HealthFigure 2.Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Time

Maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion to identify patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who respond favorably to pulmonary vein isolation: the pre-pacific study

Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Optimized Linear Ablation Vs Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone for Persistent AF

Intraprocedural Endpoints To Predict Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Randomized Trial Of Four Post-Ablation Techniques

Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Optimized Linear Ablation Vs Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone for Persistent AF: the PROMPT-AF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Vs Without Additional Low-Voltage-Area Ablation in Older Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Additional Low-Voltage-Area Ablation in Older Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Plus Low-Voltage Area Modification in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Upgraded?2c3l? Vs. PVI Approach for Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: PROMPT-AF Trial Design

Contact-force local impedance algorithm to guide effective pulmonary vein isolation in AF patients: 1-year outcome from an international multicenter clinical setting

Efficacy of Ablation Index-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Effect of Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Left Atrial Wall Isolation Plus Selective CFAE Ablation in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Prospective randomized comparison between upgraded ‘2C3L’ vs. PVI approach for catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: PROMPT-AF trial design

Long-term outcome after successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation with the radiofrequency balloon catheter: long-term results and predictors of ablation success

Long-term patient clinical benefits and healthcare utilization after pulsed field ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: sub-analyses from the multicenter inspIRE trial

Safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation patients: a single centre experience

SELECTED ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC AND BLOOD PRESSURE PARAMETERS INCLUDING VENTRICULAR-ARTERIAL COUPLING IN PREDICTING ATRIAL FIBRILLATION RECURRENCE AFTER PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION

Voltage-guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation

Is circumferential pulmonary vein isolation preferable to stepwise segmental pulmonary vein isolation for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

Pulsed field ablation using additional mapping and substrate modification to treat atrial fibrillation - one year outcome comparison

Predictors of Success for Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Pulsed-Field Ablation Using a Variable-Loop Catheter With 3D Mapping Integration: Complete 12-Month Outcomes From inspIRE