Pre‐operative measurement of heart rate variability and incidence of hypotension

B. Bein,R. Hanss,J. Scholz,P. Tonner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01130.x

2006-10-01

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract:Sir, We read with interest the article by Huang et al. (1), reporting the results of pre-operative heart rate variability (HRV) in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. This article addresses the predictive value of HRV-derived parameters in the incidence of hypotension after the induction of general anaesthesia. We agree with the authors that HRV is a useful tool to determine the balance of the autonomic nervous system, and thus may be able to serve as a predictor of the individual risk of development of hypotension following the induction of general anaesthesia. However, there are some points we wish to comment on. Firstly, the authors measured HRV pre-operatively for a 5-min interval, and subsequently determined the incidence of hypotension. Unfortunately, they do not report the time of day at which the measurement was performed, and whether this time was comparable in the study participants. It is well known that HRV is strongly influenced by circadian rhythm (2). Secondly, patients with concurrent cardiovascular medication were excluded from the study as a result of presumed drug effects on HRV measurements. However, in daily clinical routine, these patients are particularly at risk of the development of hypotension following the induction of anaesthesia (3). Therefore, it is of paramount interest to study HRV parameters and blood pressure characteristics in this patient population. Finally, the authors found a reduced high-frequency power as the single independent determinant of the magnitude of systolic blood pressure reduction. This is somewhat surprising and counterintuitive, as the high-frequency spectral power is generally accepted to reflect the parasympathetic activity of the autonomic nervous system. It has been shown recently and repeatedly that the interplay between sympathetic and parasympathetic outflow plays a key role in the development of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia, and that the low-frequency to high-frequency ratio is a sensitive and specific predictor in this respect (4, 5). Therefore, it would have been most interesting to determine the patients’ sympathetic outflow more specifically. Blood pressure variability is an accepted surrogate for sympathetic blood pressure regulation (6). As the authors used the Vasotrac device that offers a beatto-beat blood pressure determination, blood pressure variability could have been calculated easily. These data would have shed some light on the delicate interplay between sympathetic and parasympathetic outflow, and its relationship to blood pressure alterations following the induction of general anaesthesia.