Changing Our Prior Assumptions: Adapting to New Bayesian Transplant Center Report Cards

J. Schold,D. Axelrod
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.12704
IF: 9.369
2014-06-01
American Journal of Transplantation
Abstract:Regulatory scrutiny and rigorous review of center-specific outcome data are a reality across healthcare and nowhere more prominently than in solid organ transplantation. Over the past 20 years, the transplant community has been subject to outcomes analysis and reporting, initially confidentially and now publically available to regulators, payers and patients. Consequently, transplant centers have developed an understanding, perhaps grudgingly, of the tools and methods employed by Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient (SRTR) to generate Program-Specific Reports (PSRs) and the role that PSRs play in adjudicating success and failure for centers. For better or worse, it is abundantly clear that despite limitations in risk adjustment and timeliness, the PSRs have significant ramifications on clinical care through changing clinical practice, donor and recipient acceptance criteria, and, over time, to transplant center viability (1,2). The recent proposal to change the methods used by the SRTR to evaluate centerswill alter the transplant landscape by changing both flagging criteria to identify poor performance and the language used to describe transplant center outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?