Policing online professionalism: are we too alarmist?
B. Lerner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9983
2013-10-28
JAMA Internal Medicine
Abstract:It is hard to argue with concerns about the proper use of social media by medical students, residents, and senior physicians. In many instances, medical professionals have posted clearly offensive and inappropriate material. Yet the rush to police online behavior obscures the fact that similar issues have been debated for centuries. To what degree is proper “etiquette” part of a physician’s duty? What elements of physicians’ private and public lives are patients entitled to know? Should the rights of physicians outside work be more restricted than those of people with other jobs? Revisiting this history may help to develop guidance and regulations that foster professionalism but that do not unfairly restrict the online activities of doctors. Discussions of appropriate behavior for physicians, often referred to as etiquette, date back 2000 years to the Hippocratic Corpus.1 In addition to the wellknown emphasis on maintaining confidentiality, physicians from this era also wrote extensively on proper bedside manners, dress, and conduct. These issues were also included in codes of medical ethics developed by the American Medical Association and other organizations. By the mid 1900s, codes included rules about physician-physician interactions, such as prohibiting kickbacks for consultations. The 1970s saw the rise of bioethics, which built on a series of scandals and focused on protecting the rights of vulnerable patients and experimental participants. Some bioethicists derided the earlier emphasis on etiquette as exemplifying the insularity of the medical profession, more concerned with maintaining its status than with its duty to patients.1 Meanwhile, a small number of physicians had decided to “go public” with tales of less than stellar behavior. Among the most famous was “Doctor X,” author of the 1965 book Intern.2 Exhausted by the unrelenting hours and demands of internship, the author termed overweight patients “big fat slobs” and fantasized about shooting difficult patients. He even admitted to punching a cantankerous boy who had bitten him. The quintessential intern “tell-all” memoir was Samuel Shem’s The House of God.3 Published in 1978, Shem characterized his fellow interns as sex-crazed, sexist alcoholics who disdained both their patients and their supervising physicians. Shem was taught that “the only good admission is a dead admission.” Although one might assume that these exposes fueled the rise of patients’ rights and bioethics, such a connection is not clear. The public seems to have read these books—many of which sold quite well—not to wield as a weapon of change, but because they liked the tawdry details of what really went on in hospitals. The popularity of subsequent television dramas, like “St Elsewhere” and “E.R.,” corroborated this sentiment. But the books on the dehumanizing aspects of internship did contribute to a revived interest in medical etiquette, now termed “professionalism.” In both undergraduate and graduate medical programs, educators and clinicians sought to reinstill a patient-centered ethos that disappeared during the arduous years of training. The most visible effort was the White Coat Ceremony, initiated in the 1990s by the Arnold P. Gold Foundation, during which incoming medical students donned white coats, recited the Hippocratic Oath, and pledged to put patients first. Thus, it was particularly disappointing when a 2009 article reported on a series of disturbing behaviors by medical students on the Internet.4 Students were posting photographs depicting themselves and friends in sexually provocative poses, disheveled, intoxicated, or with drug paraphernalia. In addition, they were “friending” patients on Facebook. And, most worrisome, they were violating patient confidentiality, describing clinical experiences with identifiers that could be linked back to patients. Other studies revealed that medical students used vulgar language and disparaged patients on Facebook or in blog posts.5,6 Finally, students posted videos on YouTube from comedy shows that poked fun at and criticized their patients and professors. Studies of young house officers have had similar findings, although there has been less such research.7 Over the past few years, medical schools, residency programs, and state medical boards have developed guidelines seeking to limit the posting of unprofessional material on the Internet. Among the most recent and comprehensive is the policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards.8 Some of the proposed restrictions are entirely unobjectionable. Postings that violate patient confidentiality in any way are unacceptable; not only are they thoroughly unprofessional but they also violate the Health Insurance and Portability Act. Similarly, material that disparages patients based on race, sex, class, or sexual orientation is loathsome and cannot be tolerated. Requiring physicians to strengthen their privacy settings on social media is also appropriate. But other restrictions, although well meaning and certainly worth discussing, seem less straightforward. For example, some guidelines call for students and physicians to severely restrict their postings on Facebook, Twitter, and other social media sites, thus going beyond enhanced privacy settings. One of the goals here would be to ensure that the public never views pictures of medical professionals behaving badly— VIEWPOINT