Levonorgestrel intrauterine system for endometrial protection in women with breast cancer on adjuvant tamoxifen.
Sally Ad Romero,Katie Young,Martha Hickey,H Irene Su,Sally AD Romero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007245.pub4
IF: 8.4
2020-12-23
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Abstract:Adjuvant tamoxifen reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence in women with oestrogen receptor‐positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen also increases the risk of postmenopausal bleeding, endometrial polyps, hyperplasia, and endometrial cancer. The levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system (LNG‐IUS) causes profound endometrial suppression. This systematic review considered the evidence that the LNG‐IUS prevents the development of endometrial pathology in women taking tamoxifen as adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. To determine the effectiveness and safety of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG‐IUS) in pre‐ and postmenopausal women taking adjuvant tamoxifen following breast cancer for the outcomes of endometrial and uterine pathology including abnormal vaginal bleeding or spotting, and secondary breast cancer events. We searched the following databases on 29 June 2020; The Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group specialised register on 4 March 2020. We also searched two trials registers, checked references for relevant trials and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with breast cancer on adjuvant tamoxifen that compared the effectiveness of the LNG‐IUS with endometrial surveillance versus endometrial surveillance alone on the incidence of endometrial pathology. We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary outcome measure was endometrial pathology (including polyps, endometrial hyperplasia, or endometrial cancer), diagnosed at hysteroscopy or endometrial biopsy. Secondary outcome measures included fibroids, abnormal vaginal bleeding or spotting, breast cancer recurrence, and breast cancer‐related deaths. We rated the overall certainty of evidence using GRADE methods. We included four RCTs (543 women analysed) in this review. We judged the certainty of the evidence to be moderate for all of the outcomes, due to imprecision (i.e. limited sample sizes and low event rates). In the included studies, the active treatment arm was the 20 μg/day LNG‐IUS plus endometrial surveillance; the control arm was endometrial surveillance alone. In tamoxifen users, the LNG‐IUS probably reduces the incidence of endometrial polyps compared to the control group over both a 12‐month period (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08 to 0.64, I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, n = 212; moderate‐certainty evidence) and over a long‐term follow‐up period (24 to 60 months) (Peto OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.39; I2 = 0%; 4 RCTs, n = 417; moderate‐certainty evidence). For long‐term follow‐up, this suggests that if the incidence of endometrial polyps following endometrial surveillance alone is assumed to be 23.5%, the incidence following LNG‐IUS with endometrial surveillance would be between 3.8% and 10.7%. The LNG‐IUS probably slightly reduces the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia compared with controls over a long‐term follow‐up period (24 to 60 months) (Peto OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.67; I2 = 0%; 4 RCTs, n = 417; moderate‐certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of endometrial hyperplasia following endometrial surveillance alone is assumed to be 2.8%, the chance following LNG‐IUS with endometrial surveillance would be between 0.1% and 1.9%. However, it should be noted that there were only six cases of endometrial hyperplasia. There was insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion regarding the incidence of endometrial cancer in tamoxifen users, as no studies reported cases of endometrial cancer. At 12 months of follow‐up, the LNG‐IUS probably increases abnormal vaginal bleeding or spotting compared to the control group (Peto OR 7.26, 95% CI 3.37 to 15.66; I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, n = 376; moderate‐certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of abnormal vaginal bleeding or spotting following endometrial surveillance alone is assumed to be 1.7%, the chance following LNG‐IUS with endometrial surveillance would be between 5.6% and 21.5%. By 24 months of follow‐up, abnormal vaginal bleeding or spotting occurs less frequently than at 12 months of follow‐up, but is still more common in the LNG‐IUS group than the control group (Peto OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.04 to 7.10; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, n = 233; moderate‐certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of abnormal vaginal bleeding or spotting following endometrial surveillance alone is assumed to be 4.2%, the chance following LNG‐IUS with endometrial surveillance would be between 4.4% and 23.9%. By 60 months of follow‐up, there were no cases of abnormal vaginal bleeding or spotting in either group. The numbers of events for the following outcomes were low: fibroids (n = 13), -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal