Evaluation of an electronic prescription platform: Clinicians' feedback on three distinct services aiming to facilitate clinical decision and safer e-prescription
Margarita Grammatikopoulou,Martha Zachariadou,Maria Zande,Georgios Giannios,Achilleas Chytas,Haralampos Karanikas,Spiros Georgakopoulos,Dimitrios Karanikas,George Nikolaidis,Pantelis Natsiavas,Thanos G. Stavropoulos,Spiros Nikolopoulos,Ioannis Kompatsiaris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.004
IF: 3.348
2024-04-19
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
Abstract:Background Health Care Professionals (HCPs) are the main end-users of digital clinical tools such as electronic prescription systems. For this reason, it is of high importance to include HCPs throughout the design, development and evaluation of a newly introduced system to ensure its usefulness, as well as confirm that it tends to their needs and can be integrated in their everyday clinical practice. Methods In the context of the PrescIT project, an electronic prescription platform with three services was developed (i.e., Prescription Check, Prescription Suggestion, Therapeutic Prescription Monitoring). To allow an iterative process of discovery through user feedback, design and implementation, a two-phase evaluation was carried out, with the participation of HCPs from three hospitals in northern Greece. The two-phase evaluation included presentations of the platform, followed by think-aloud sessions, individual platform testing and the collection of qualitative as well as quantitative feedback, through standard questionnaires (e.g., SUS, PSSUQ). Results Twenty one HCPs (8 in the first, 18 in the second phase, and five present in both) participated in the two-phase evaluation. HCPs comprised clinicians varying in their specialty and one pharmacist. Clinicians' feedback during the first evaluation phase already deemed usability as "excellent" (with SUS scores ranging from 75 to 95/100, showing a mean value of 86.6 and SD of 9.2) but also provided additional user requirements, which further shaped and improved the services. In the second evaluation phase, clinicians explored the system's usability, and identified the services' strengths and weaknesses. Clinicians perceived the platform as useful, as it provides information on potential adverse drug reactions, drug-to-drug interactions and suggests medications that are compatible with patients' comorbidities and current medication. Conclusions The developed PrescIT platform aims to increase overall safety and effectiveness of healthcare services. Therefore, including clinicians in a two-phase evaluation confirmed that the introduced system is useful, tends to the users' needs, does not create fatigue and can be integrated in their everyday clinical practice to support clinical decision and e-prescribing.
public, environmental & occupational health