Teaching Digital Medicine to Undergraduate Medical Students with an Interprofessional and Interdisciplinary Approach: A Proof of Concept Study
Annabelle Mielitz,Ulf Kulau,Lucas Bublitz,Anja Bittner,Hendrik Friederichs,Urs-Vito Albrecht
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/56787
2024-08-14
Abstract:Background: An integration of digital medicine into medical education can help future doctors to shape the digital transformation of medicine. Objective: A newly developed course for teaching digital medicine (Bielefeld model) is described and evaluated for the first time. Methods: The course was held with undergraduate medical students at Medical School OWL at Bielefeld University, Germany, in 2023, and evaluated via pre-post surveys. The subjective and objective achievement of superordinate learning objectives and the objective achievement of subordinate learning objectives of the course, course design and course importance were evaluated utilizing five-point Likert scales (1="strongly disagree", 5="strongly agree"), a multiple choice format for reasons of absence, and open comments. The superordinate objectives comprise the understanding of factors driving the implementation of digital medical products and processes (1), the application of this knowledge to a project (2), and the empowerment to design such solutions (3) in the future. The subordinate objectives comprise competencies related to the first superordinate objective. Results: 10 undergraduate medical students (male: 4, female: 6, mean age 21.7 years, SD: 2.1 years) evaluated the course. The superordinate objectives were achieved well to very well: the medians for the objective achievement were 4 scale units (su) (IQR 4-5 su), 4 su (IQR 3-5 su) and 4 su (IQR 4-4 su) for the first, second and third objective and the medians for the subjective achievement of the first, second and third objective were 4 su (IQR 3-4 su), 4.5 su (IQR 3-5 su) and 4 su (IQR 3-5 su). Participants mastered the subordinate objectives, averagely, better after the course than before (pre-survey median:2.5 su (IQR 2-3 su), post-survey median: 4 su (IQR 3-4 su)). The course concept was rated as highly suitable for achieving the superordinate objectives (medians: 5 su (IQR 4-5 su) for the first, second, and third objective). On average, the students highly liked the course (median: 5 su (IQR 4-5 su)) and gained a benefit from (median: 4.5 su (IQR 4-5 su)). All students fully agreed that the teaching staff was a strength of the course. The category "Positive feedback on the course or positive personal experience with the course" received most comments. Conclusions: The course framework exhibits promise in attaining learning objectives within the realm of digital medicine, notwithstanding the constraint of limited interpretability arising from a small sample size and further limitations. It aligns with insights derived from teaching and learning research and the domain of digital medicine, albeit with identifiable areas for enhancement. A literature review indicates a dearth of publications pertaining to analogous courses in Germany. Future investigations should entail a more exhaustive evaluation of the course. In summary, this course constitutes a valuable contribution to incorporating digital medicine into medical education.