Abstract:Firms in developing countries, which have been isolated from the world economy by protectionist policies, may urgently need restructuring after any move towards trade and investment liberalizing policies. Some countries can serve as interesting models of transition, such as Mexico, which prepared for entry into the managed trade of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) by a brief period of internal market liberalization and privatization under President Salinas and his predecessor. Today Mexico is developing competitive MNEs with access to the large US ‘triad’ market, especially in such sectors as cement and glass. The Mexican model is now replacing the self-sufficient Prebisch-type strategies attempted, with unsatisfactory results, by some Latin American countries in the 1960s and 1970s. Mexico’s market access policies provide opportunities for domestic firms to develop global best practice technologies and processes, whereas ‘shelter-type’ strategies do not develop such long-run competitive advantages (Rugman and Verbeke, 1990). In this chapter, the unit of analysis is the firm and the literature to be incorporated is from business policy and strategy. Virtually all this literature has been developed for analysis of decision-making by managers in ‘triad’-based firms. The ‘triad’ consists of the United States, the EU and Japan. Multinational enterprises with a home base in these triad markets account for over 80 per cent of the world’s stock of foreign direct investment (Rugman, 1996a; United Nations, 1998). The most influential work on strategy from this perspective is that by Michael Porter (1980, 1990). In particular, his ‘diamond’ framework of international competitiveness demonstrates how a triad-based firm can build upon the four domestic diamond components (factor conditions, home demand, rivalry/market structure and related/supporting activities) in order to enhance the country’s international competitiveness. Government and chance also affect competitiveness, but are not central determinants.

Regional and global strategies of MNEs: Revisiting Rugman & Verbeke (2004)

Multinational Enterprises in the New Europe:

The Regional Nature of Japanese Multinational Business

The Regional Character of Asian Multinational Enterprises

Asian Business Is Regional, Not Global

Multinational Enterprises, Development and Globalization: Some Clarifications and a Research Agenda

Global Configurations of Fortune Top 500s and Outcomes

Friedman's Follies: Insights on the Globalization/Regionalization Debate

Case Selection Biases in Management Research: the Implications for International Business Studies

Globalization Impact on Multinational Enterprises

Globalisation or Regionalisation of Technological Knowledge Learning in Multinational Corporations

7. Multinational enterprise strategy for developing countries

What determines the establishment of Chinese multinational enterprises’ Asian regional headquarters?

MNE Microfoundations and Routines for Building a Legitimate and Sustainable Position in Emerging Markets

Multinational enterprises’ internationalization and adoption of sustainable development goals

A Global Value Chain Analysis of the ‘Regional Strategy’ Perspective

Rethinking the Literature on the Performance of Chinese Multinational Enterprises

Do MNEs from developed and emerging economies differ in their location choice of FDI? A 36-year review

Global R & D networks and large-scale innovations: The case of the automobile industry

How much does home country matter to corporate profitability?