Abstract:The international wildlife trade, contributing billions of dollars to global economies and encompassing thousands of species, has increased due to rising demands for wildlife products. Revealing the key participants and trade characteristics across taxa is imperative for sustaining wildlife resources and conservation efforts. To provide a basis for informed wildlife management and trade supervision, we investigated the global wildlife trade's fundamental characteristics and spatial patterns by analyzing transaction records reported to The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) from 2020 to 2022. During this period, the essential demands for wildlife were highlighted due to stricter trade regulations and higher trade costs in response to the suspected wildlife origin of the pandemic. Our analysis highlights the formation of trade communities that are tightly interconnected by strong trade relations in wildlife trade networks, transcending geographical limitations. Unlike the division of the continents, geographical proximity alone does not necessarily contribute to the formation of these trade communities. Germany emerges as the leading importer based on trade frequency, while the Netherlands leads in exports. The main driving forces behind wildlife trades include commercial use (74.98%), personal use (3.80%), and hunting trophies (3.19%). Apart from 44.90% of flora trades, Reptilia was the primary traded taxa (21.08%), involving 196 engaged countries/territories with the most mutual connections (27.21%) and an average of 12.51 shipments to 11.33 nodes. Aves (9.70%), Mammalia (9.44%), and Anthozoa (7.62%) followed. Notably, certain European and Asian countries/territories dominate the import or export of most trades, exhibiting distinct variations across taxa. The United Arab Emirates led the Aves trade, accounting for 15.96% of global Aves transactions during this period. Similarly, Italy led the Reptilia trades (21.28%), South Africa led the Mammalia trades (18.72%), and Indonesia led the trades in Insecta (56.84%), Hydrozoa (66.96%), and Anthozoa (56.12%). Our findings underscore the traded species facing overexploited and the countries most involved, thereby informing proactive monitoring and policy-making for sustainable wildlife conservation and management.

Understanding China's wildlife markets: Trade and tradition in an age of pandemic

Why Do We Need a Wildlife Consumption Ban in China?

Will the COVID-19 Outbreak Be a Turning Point for China's Wildlife Protection: New Developments and Challenges of Wildlife Conservation in China

Wildlife Trade, Consumption and Conservation Awareness in Southwest China

Wildlife Consumption, Health, and Zoonotic Disease in China after the Emergence of COVID-19.

Understanding and Changing Wildlife Consumption Behavior from a Multidisciplinary Perspective

Animal sales from Wuhan wet markets immediately prior to the COVID-19 pandemic

Perceptions of COVID-19 origins and China's wildlife policy reforms

COVID-19 and the racialisation of Chinese wildlife consumption

Public Perception of Wildlife Consumption and Trade During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Financial speculation meets cultural heritage in China's wildlife markets

Support for Wildlife Consumption Bans and Policies in China Post-Covid-19

Permanently Ban Wildlife Consumption

Differences in Game Consumption Patterns Between North and South China

Regulating wildlife conservation and food safety to prevent human exposure to novel virus

Problems and Countermeasures in the Surveillance and Research of Wildlife Epidemics Based on Mammals in China

Illicit Wildlife Trade, Wet Markets, and COVID‐19: Preventing Future Pandemics

Changing legislative thinking in China to better protect wild animals and human health

Consumer Behavior and Wild Animal Consumption in China

Communities Beyond Geographical Limitation: the Network Characteristics of International Wildlife Trade under the Pandemic

Rethinking Game Consumption in Tourism: a Case of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Outbreak in China