An unusual complication of a ventricular pace maker electrode.

T. Sassard,S. Fareh,F. Farhat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJCTS.2006.11.041

IF: 4.534

2007-02-01

European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of a Free Smartphone Application for Evaluation of Jump Height

Amândio Dias,Paulo Pires,Leandro Santana,Paulo Marques,Mário C Espada,Fernando Santos,Eduardo Jorge Da Silva,André Rebelo,Diogo S Teixeira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9030155

2024-09-01

Abstract:Background/Objectives: Jump test assessment is commonly used for physical tests, with different type of devices used for its evaluation. The purpose of the present study was to examine the validity and reliability of a freely accessible mobile application (VertVision, version 2.0.5) for measuring jump performance. Methods: With that intent, thirty-eight college age recreationally active subjects underwent test assessment after a specific warm-up, performing countermovement jumps (CMJs) and squat jumps (SJs) on a contact platform while being recorded with a smartphone camera. Jump height was the criterion variable, with the same formula being used for both methods. Data analysis was performed by two experienced observers. Results: The results showed strong correlations with the contact platform (ICC > 0.9) for both jumps. Furthermore, between-observer reliability was also high (ICC > 0.9; CV ≤ 2.19), with lower values for smallest worthwhile change (≤0.23) and typical error of measurement (≤0.14). Estimation error varied when accounting for both observers, with the SJ accounting for bigger differences (4.1-6.03%), when compared to the CMJ (0.73-3.09%). Conclusions: The study suggests that VertVision is a suitable and handy method for evaluating jump performance. However, it presents a slight estimation error when compared to the contact platform.
Concurrent Validity and Reliability of My Jump 2 App for Measuring Vertical Jump Height in Recreationally Active Adults

Špela Bogataj,Maja Pajek,Slobodan Andrašić,Nebojša Trajković

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113805

2020-05-30

Applied Sciences

Abstract:This study aimed to examine the reliability, validity, and usefulness of the smartphone-based application, My Jump 2, against Optojump in recreationally active adults. Participants (18 women, 28.9 ± 5.6 years, and 26 men, 30.1 ± 10.6 years) completed squat jumps (SJ), counter-movement jumps (CMJ), and CMJ with arm swing (CMJAS) on Optojump and were simultaneously recorded using My Jump 2. To evaluate concurrent validity, jump height, calculated from flight time attained from each device, was compared for each jump type. Test-retest reliability was determined by replicating data analysis of My Jump 2 recordings on two occasions separated by two weeks. High test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.93) was observed for all measures in both male and female athletes. Very large correlations were observed between the My Jump 2 app and Optojump for SJ (r = 0.95, p = 0.001), CMJ (r = 0.98, p = 0.001), and CMJAS (r = 0.98, p = 0.001) in male athletes. Similar results were obtained for female recreational athletes for all jumps (r > 0.94, p = 0.001). The study results suggest that My Jump 2 is a valid, reliable, and useful tool for measuring vertical jump in recreationally active adults. Therefore, due to its simplicity and practicality, it can be used by practitioners, coaches, and recreationally-active adults to measure vertical jump performance with a simple test as SJ, CMJ, and CMJAS.
Vertical Jump Height Estimation Algorithm based on Vertical Acceleration Profile Characteristics via Foot-Worn Inertial Sensing.

Jianren Wang,Junkai Xu,Peter B Shull

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038740

2018-01-01

Abstract:Vertical jump height is widely used for assessing motor development, functional ability, and motor capacity. Traditional methods for estimating vertical jump height rely on force plates or optical marker-based motion capture systems limiting assessment to people with access to specialized laboratories. Current wearable designs need to be attached to the skin or strapped to an appendage which can potentially be uncomfortable and inconvenient to use. This paper presents a novel algorithm for estimating vertical jump height based on foot-worn inertial sensors. Twenty healthy subjects performed countermovement jumping trials and maximum jump height was determined via inertial sensors located above the toe and under the heel and was compared with the gold standard maximum jump height estimation via optical marker-based motion capture. Average vertical jump height estimation errors from inertial sensing at the toe and heel were -2.2 +/- 2.1 cm and -0.4 +/- 3.8 cm, respectively. Vertical jump height estimation with the presented algorithm via inertial sensing showed excellent reliability at the toe (ICC(2,1) = 0.98) and heel (ICC(2,1) = 0.97). There was no significant bias in the inertial sensing at the toe, but proportional bias (b = 1.22) and fixed bias (a = -10.23cm) were detected in inertial sensing at the heel. These results indicate that the presented algorithm could be applied to foot-worn inertial sensors to estimate maximum jump height enabling assessment outside of traditional laboratory settings, and to avoid bias errors, the toe may be a more suitable location for inertial sensor placement than the heel.
The validity and reliability of an iPhone app for measuring vertical jump performance

Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández,Mark Glaister,Richard Anthony Lockey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.996184

IF: 3.9428

2015-01-02

Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract:The purpose of this investigation was to analyse the concurrent validity and reliability of an iPhone app (called: My Jump) for measuring vertical jump performance. Twenty recreationally active healthy men (age: 22.1 ± 3.6 years) completed five maximal countermovement jumps, which were evaluated using a force platform (time in the air method) and a specially designed iPhone app. My jump was developed to calculate the jump height from flight time using the high-speed video recording facility on the iPhone 5 s. Jump heights of the 100 jumps measured, for both devices, were compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient, Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (r), Cronbach's alpha (α), coefficient of variation and Bland-Altman plots. There was almost perfect agreement between the force platform and My Jump for the countermovement jump height (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.997, P < 0.001; Bland-Altman bias = 1.1 ± 0.5 cm, P < 0.001). In comparison with the force platform, My Jump showed good validity for the CMJ height (r = 0.995, P < 0.001). The results of the present study showed that CMJ height can be easily, accurately and reliably evaluated using a specially developed iPhone 5 s app.

sport sciences
Agreement between Force Platform and Smartphone Application-Derived Measures of Vertical Jump Height in Youth Grassroots Soccer Players

Jason Tallis,Rhys O. Morris,Michael J. Duncan,Emma L. J. Eyre,Lucas Guimaraes-Ferreira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports11060117

2023-06-13

Sports

Abstract:Given the importance of vertical jump assessments as a performance benchmarking tool, the assessment of neuromuscular function and indicator of health status, accurate assessment is essential. This study compared countermovement jump (CMJ) height assessed using MyJump2 (JHMJ) to force-platform-derived jump height calculated from time in the air (JHTIA) and take-off velocity (JHTOV) in youth grassroots soccer players. Thirty participants (Age: 8.7 ± 0.42 yrs; 9 females) completed bilateral CMJs on force platforms whilst jump height was simultaneously evaluated using MyJump2. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Standard error of measurement (SEM), coefficient of variance (CV) and Bland–Altman analysis were used to compare performance of MyJump2 to force-platform-derived measures of CMJ height. The median jump height was 15.5 cm. Despite a high level of agreement between JHTIA and JHTOV (ICC = 0.955), CV (6.6%), mean bias (1.33 ± 1.62 cm) and 95% limits of agreement (LoA −1.85–4.51 cm) were greater than in other comparisons. JHMJ performed marginally better than JHTIA when compared to JHTOV (ICC = 0.971; 95% CI’s = 0.956–0.981; SEM = 0.3 cm; CV = 5.7%; mean bias = 0.36 ± 1.61 cm; LoA = −3.52–2.80 cm). Irrespective of method, jump height did not differ between males and females (p > 0.381; r < 0.093), and the comparison between assessment tools was not affected by sex. Given low jump heights achieved in youth, JHTIA and JHMJ should be used with caution. JHTOV should be used to guarantee accuracy in the calculation of jump height.
The validity and reliability of the My Jump 2 app for measuring vertical stiffness in male college players

Yizhang Wang,Xintang Wang,Chenglin Luan,Wei Shan,Lijing Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1405118

2024-05-30

Abstract:Background: Vertical stiffness (Kvert) can be used to evaluate sports performance and injury risk in players. The My Jump 2 smartphone application (App), is increasingly being used by researchers, coaches, and players in the competitive sports field. We aimed to analyze the reliability and concurrent validity of the My Jump 2 app for measuring Kvert in male college players. Methods: Twenty male college players (10 soccer players, 10 basketball players; age, 20.2 ± 1.3 years old; weight, 76.4 ± 6.0 kg; height, 178.3 ± 4.7 cm) volunteered to take part in this study. Three drop jumps were performed by participants from 30 cm to 40 cm on a force platform and retested after three days. All the jumps were recorded by both the Force platform and the My Jump 2 app. Data obtained from the above two devices were compared using the paired t tests, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), Pearson product moment correlation coefficient (r), Bland-Altman plots, and one-way regression. Results: There was almost perfect agreement between measurement instruments for the Kvert value (ICC > 0.972, 95% CI = 0.954-0.992, P < 0.01). Almost perfect agreement was observed between evaluators (ICC > 0.989, 95% CI = 0.981-0.997, P < 0.05). Also, the My Jump 2 app showed excellent intra-rater reliability in all participants (ICC = 1.000, 95% CI = 1.000-1.000, P < 0.001). The My Jump 2 showed good variability when measuring Kvert at T1 30 cm (CV = 5.4%), T1 40 cm (CV = 6.7%), T2 30 cm (CV = 5.0%), and T2 40 cm (CV = 10.3%). The test-retest reliability of My Jump 2 was moderate to good at 30 cm (ICC = 0.708, 95% CI = 0.509-0.827); however, it was lower to moderate at 40 cm (ICC = 0.445, 95% CI = 0.222-0.625). Very large correlations were observed between the force platform and the My Jump 2 for Kvert (r > 0.9655, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The My Jump 2 smartphone application showed excellent reliability and intra-rater consistency in measuring Kvert in male college players. While demonstrating excellent intra-rater consistency and strong agreement with force platform measurements, it showed slightly lower reliability at higher jump heights. Overall, the My Jump 2 app is a valid tool for evaluating Kvert in college players with careful consideration of its limitations, particularly at higher jump heights.
Validity and Reliability of the Orthelligent Pro Sensor for Measuring Single-Leg Vertical Jump Height in Healthy Athletic Adults

Caterina Pasquale,Pierrette Baschung Pfister,Manuel Kuhn,Thomas Stöggl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123699

IF: 3.9

2024-06-08

Sensors

Abstract:The Orthelligent Pro sensor is a practicable, portable measuring instrument. This study assessed the validity and reliability of this sensor in measuring single-leg countermovement jumps. Fifty healthy athletic adults participated in two measurement sessions a week apart in time. They performed single-leg countermovement jumps on the force plate while wearing the Orthelligent Pro sensor on their lower leg. During the first measurement session, Tester 1 invited the participants to make three single-leg countermovement jumps; subsequently, Tester 2 did the same. For assessing the sensor's intratester reliability, Tester 1 again invited the participants to make three single-leg countermovement jumps during the second measurement session. The sensor's validity was assessed by using the force plate results as the gold standard. To determinate the agreement between two measurements, Bland–Altman plots were created. The intertester reliability (ICC = 0.99; 0.97) and intratester reliability (ICC = 0.96; 0.82) were both excellent. The validity calculated (i) on the basis of the mean value of three jumps and (ii) on the basis of the maximum value of three jumps was very high, but it showed a systematic error. Taking this error into account, physiotherapists can use the Orthelligent Pro sensor as a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the jump height of countermovement jumps.

engineering, electrical & electronic,instruments & instrumentation,chemistry, analytical
The concurrent validity and reliability of the My Jump Lab smartphone app for the real-time measurement of vertical jump performance

Deniz Şentürk,Oğuzhan Yüksel,Zeki Akyildiz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371241246439

2024-04-11

Abstract:The present study had two main objectives: (i) to assess the concurrent validity and agreement of real-time measurement of counter-movement jump (CMJ) height using the My Jump Lab (MJL) mobile application in comparison to a force plate and (ii) to evaluate the intra-session reliability and agreement of the force plate and the MJL application. This cross-sectional investigation involved 36 recreationally active, healthy men (mean age = 22.2 ± 2.9 years) who performed five CMJ repetitions on the force plate with a 2-min rest period. Their jump heights were concurrently recorded using both the force plate and the MJL application. The high validity between the two methods intraclass correlation coefficient >0.984) was observed for all cases. There was a nearly perfect correlation ( r = 0.968, p = 0.001, in all cases) between the force plate and MJL application, with very good agreement and a mean difference of 1.016 cm (95% confidence interval: −1.229 to −0.803 cm). High intra-session reliability was observed in the force platform (SEM, 0.42 cm; CV, 1.21%; MDC, 1.5; SWC, 1.12), and MJL (SEM, 0.43 cm; CV, 1.23%; MDC, 1.20; SWC, 1.17). The results demonstrate that the MJL application is a valid and reliable tool for measuring jump performance in real-time and assessing CMJ height.

engineering, mechanical,sport sciences
Real time estimation of vertical jump height with a markerless motion capture smartphone app: A proof-of-concept case study

Carlos Balsalobre-Fernández

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371241227817

2024-01-30

Abstract:The aim of the present proof-of-concept case study was to explore the potential of a novel technology using artificial intelligence techniques to measure countermovement jump height (CMJ-h) in real time. Four hundred jumps were recorded from a single male participant over a period of 24 consecutive weeks, while CMJ-h was simultaneously registered with a force plate and a newly developed version of the My Jump Lab iOS app that used computer vision to measure CMJ-h in real time with the iPhone camera. A very high correlation ( r = 0.971, 95% CI = 0.963–0.975) and large agreement (ICC = 0.969, 95% CI = 0.963–0.975) were observed between measurements. Statistically significant, large differences were observed between instruments (mean absolute difference = 0.06 ± 0.01 m, d = 4.4, p < 0.001). However, when using the regression equation between devices to correct the app’s raw data ( R 2 = 0.94, y = 1.0004x – 0.0641), non-significant, trivial differences were observed (mean absolute difference = 0.01 ± 0.008 m, d = 0.1, p = 1.000). Collectively, the findings of this study highlight the potential of this novel artificial intelligence app for the measurement of CMJ-h in real time. However, considering the nature of this investigation, more research is needed to confirm the results observed in a wider population.

engineering, mechanical,sport sciences
Reliability and validity of "My Jump 2" application for countermovement jump free arm and interlimb jump symmetry in different sports of professional athletes

Yong Peng,Shaotong Sun,Yudi Wang,Ya Xuan Qin,Di Qin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17658

IF: 3.061

2024-07-09

PeerJ

Abstract:Background: Vertical jumping is an important evaluation tool to measure muscle strength and power as well as lower limb symmetry. It is of practical importance and value to develop and utilize a portable and low-cost mobile application (APP) to evaluate jumping. The "My Jump 2" app is an iPhone camera-based application for measuring jumping movements, which is applied to the countermovement jump (CMJ) vertical jumps of the lower limbs of athletes in different sports. The validity of this application and previous versions applied to different forms of vertical jump tests has been preliminarily demonstrated in different population, which has an obvious progress in research. Therefore, the reliability and validity of the jump height, time of flight parameters and symmetry of the CMJ vertical jump of athletes in different sports are needed to be verified by more experiments. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to verify whether "My Jump 2" can effectively and reliably assess jump height, flight practice and lower limb symmetry in CMJAM (countermovement jump free arm) tests in fencing, swimming and diving athletes. Methods: Seventy-nine fencers, swimmers and divers with training experience participated in this study. They completed a total of three CMJAM vertical jump and lower limb symmetry tests in 1 day, while being assessed by using the "My Jump 2" application and a force platform. The intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to verify reliability, while the Cronbach's alpha and coefficient of variation (CV%) was used to analyze the stability of the CMJAM vertical jump test over three jumps. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to verify the strength of the relationship between methods (i.e., concurrent validity), and the Bland-Altman plot was used to represent consistency, meanwhile, the t-test was used to determine the systematic bias between methods. Results: Compared with the force platform, the cumulative height values of the total number of jumps (r = 0.999; p = 0.000), the cumulative time to vacate (r = 0.999; p = 0.000) for the CMJAM test obtained by the "My Jump 2" application, the height (ICC = 0.999-1, p = 0.000), the time to vacate flight (ICC = 0.999-1, p = 0.000), contact time symmetry (ICC = 0.976-0.994, p = 0.000), and flight time symmetry (ICC = 0.921-0.982, p = 0.000), respectively. Showed high correlation between the results of "my jump 2" app and the force platform. Conclusion: The "My Jump 2" application is a valid tool to assess CMJAM vertical jump and lower limb symmetry in fencing, swimming and diving athletes with training experience.
Reliability and Accuracy of Portable Devices for Measuring Countermovement Jump Height in Physically Active Adults: A Comparison of Force Platforms, Contact Mats, and Video-Based Software

Amritashish Bagchi,Shiny Raizada,Rohit K. Thapa,Valentina Stefanica,Halil İbrahim Ceylan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14111394

2024-10-31

Life

Abstract:Measuring countermovement jump (CMJ) height accurately is essential for evaluating lower-body explosive power in athletes and other active populations. With technological advancements, various portable tools have been developed for this purpose, including force platforms, contact mats, and video-based software. This study aimed to (a) investigate the test–retest reliability of the KINVENT K-Deltas force platform for CMJ height measurement and (b) compare its accuracy with a contact mat (Chronojump, Spain) and a video-based software (My Jump app, version 3). Twenty-two physically active collegiate athletes (mean age of 19.7 ± 1.2 years) from various sports backgrounds completed five CMJ trials with simultaneous height measurements using all three tools. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Cronbach's alpha, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated to assess reliability. In contrast, Pearson correlations and Bland–Altman plots were used to compare device results. The K-Deltas force platform exhibited high test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.981), closely matching the contact mat (ICC = 0.987) and the My Jump app (ICC = 0.986). Correlations between the instruments were strong (force platform vs. contact mat: r = 0.987; force platform vs. My Jump: r = 0.987; contact mat vs. My Jump: r = 0.996), with no between-instrument differences (t-test p = 0.203–0.935, effect size ≤ 0.01–0.16), demonstrating the interchangeability of these tools for practical purposes. However, Bland–Altman analysis revealed limits of agreement between the devices, indicating small but consistent measurement differences. While all instruments were reliable, discrepancies in the absolute values suggest practitioners should consider device-specific variations when comparing CMJ data. These findings highlight the reliability of the K-Deltas force platform as a viable alternative for measuring CMJ height, though differences between devices should be accounted for in applied settings. Therefore, the portable force plates can monitor training, predict injury risk, assess neuromuscular fatigue, and lead to informed decision-making.

biology
Common Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index Measuring Devices: A Validity and Reliability Analysis

Samuel Montalvo,Matthew P. Gonzalez,Martin S. Dietze-Hermosa,Jeffrey D. Eggleston,Sandor Dorgo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003988

2021-02-24

Abstract:ABSTRACT: Montalvo, S, Gonzalez, MP, Dietze-Hermosa, M, Eggleston, JD, and Dorgo, S. Common vertical jump and reactive strength index measuring devices: A validity and reliability analysis. J Strength Cond Res 35(5): 1234-1243, 2021-Several field-test devices exist to assess vertical jump, but they either lack proper validation or have been validated for the countermovement jump (CMJ) only. This study aimed to quantify the validity and reliability of metrics, including jump height and the calculated reactive strength index (RSI), obtained using the flight-time method from 4 different assessment devices with 3 different vertical jump modalities in comparison to a force platform (criterion assessment). The Optojump, Push-Band 2.0, MyJump2 mobile application, and What'sMyVert mobile application were used synchronously and together with the force platforms. Thirty subjects (17 males and 13 females; age ± SD: 23.37 ± 1.87 years) performed 5 repetitions of CMJ, squat jump (SQJ), and drop jump (DJ) with a standardized 90° knee flexion for all jumps. Relative reliability was determined by intraclass correlation (ICC) and absolute reliability by coefficient of variation (CV) analyses. Excellent reliability was considered as ICC > 0.9 and CV < 10%. Validity was obtained through an ordinary least products regression, ICC, and CV. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Reliability was excellent on jump height for the CMJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 8.14%) for all instruments. With the exception of the Optojump, all instruments also had excellent reliability for the SQJ (ICC ≥ 0.98; CV ≤ 6.62) and DJ (ICC ≥ 0.94; CV ≤ 8.19). For the RSI metric, all instruments had excellent relative reliability (ICC ≥ 0.92), but none had excellent absolute reliability (CV ≥ 12.5%). The MyJump2 and What'sMyVert apps showed excellent validity on all jump modalities and RSI. The Optojump and Push-Band 2.0 devices both showed system and proportional bias for several jump modalities and RSI. Overall, both mobile applications may provide coaches with a cost-effective and reliable measurement of various vertical jumps.

sport sciences
Concurrent validity and reliability of photoelectric and accelerometer technology for calculating vertical jump height in female athletes

Andrew S. Perrotta,Brent D. Day,Ibrahim Wafai,Robert P. Oates,Maggie L. Peterson,Anika J. Scott,Rachel C. Barker,Athena B. Garedakis,Kayla A. Seaborn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00440-6

2023-11-08

Sports Engineering

Abstract:The unremitting development of portable vertical jump equipment emphasizes the need for continual examination of its validity and reliability. Equal representation between sexes should be endorsed in this process to improve precision and application. This study aimed to examine the concurrent validity and reliability of the Exsurgo g-FlightTM photoelectric boxes and the Output Sports V2TM accelerometer for calculating vertical jump height when compared to a dual force plate system (Hawkin Dynamics Force Plate, ME, USA). Twenty ( n = 20) female soccer players performed three counter movement jumps on two different sessions for a total of 120 jumps. Comparisons between the criterion method and secondary measures were performed using Bland–Altman plots and were independently examined using a paired samples t -test. Reliability in instrument error was determined by comparing the residuals of each secondary measure over two assessments. Bland–Altman plots revealed ≤ 5.0% of residuals for the accelerometer and photoelectric devices fell outside the limits of agreement. The accelerometer revealed a mean bias (95% CI) of 0.30 ± 0.33 cm, while the photoelectric device demonstrated a negative bias of −1.64 ± 0.45 cm. Mean (± SD) comparisons revealed an overestimation in jump height with the photoelectric device (1.6 ± 4.0 cm, p < 0.0001) and insignificant differences with the accelerometer (0.30 ± 3.7 cm, p > 0.05). Mean differences in residuals between testing dates for secondary measures were insignificant ( p ≥ 0.23). Both the photoelectric and accelerometer instruments displayed high reliability, but differences in the accuracy between devices were observed.
COMPARISON OF VARIOUS DEVICES USED IN THE EVALUATION OF VERTICAL JUMP HEIGHT

Özlem KÖKLÜ,Ahmet ALPTEKİN,Halil KORKMAZ

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1332607

2023-10-26

Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences

Abstract:This study aimed to compare three methods (Bertec, Simi Motion Capture, and My Jump II Application) for calculating vertical jump height. 29 male college students (age: 22.4 ± 1.0 years; height: 178.1 ± 6.2cm; body weight: 71.2 ± 8.0 kg) voluntarily participated in the study. Two countermovement jumps with 1-minute intervals on a force platform (BERTEC 4060-10) were performed. The countermovement jump performances were captured using an iPhone 11 (Apple Inc., USA). The experimental setup involved the utilization of two high-speed cameras, specifically the My Jump II and SIMI Motion 7.5. The results showed that participants had significantly lower jump height calculated from hip displacement (HD) (p = 0.01, (-8.3 ± 3.86, 95%CI(MyJumpII-HD) = 1.24/3.30). It was also found that calculations from left and right foot displacement were higher than My Jump II results (95%CI (MyJumpII- RFD -0.66/2.93) and 95%CI(MyJumpII-LFD) = -0.63/2.65). In contrast, force plate calculations, known as the gold standard in the literature, were very similar to My Jump (95%CI(MyJumpII-FP) = 2.38/4.01). The findings indicate that the My Jump II, used for assessing vertical jump height, may be used as a reliable alternative for determining jump height instead of setting up gold standard methods. More research is needed to understand better the specific sport's contribution to every vertical jump assessment technique. Individuals' athletic performance abilities and their birth, gender, and sport preference should be considered. Finally, when coaches or sports scientists intend to measure CMJ, My Jump II can be used in a laboratory setting with reasonable accuracy.
Validity and Reliability of the GymAware Linear Position Transducer for Squat Jump and Counter-Movement Jump Height

Tanuj Wadhi,Jacob T Rauch,Nauris Tamulevicius,Jody C Andersen,Eduardo O De Souza,Jacob Rauch,Jody Andersen,Eduardo De Souza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sports6040177

2018-12-19

Sports

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of a linear position transducer (LPT) for the squat jump (SJ) and counter-movement jump (CMJ) height. Twenty-eight subjects (25.18 ± 7.1 years) performed three SJs followed by three CMJs using a force plate concurrently with the LPT to test validity. Subjects returned on a separate day, at least 48 h apart, to measure test-retest reliability. A t-test showed a significant difference between the two devices for both SJ (p < 0.001) and CMJ (p < 0.001) while Bland–Altman analysis for validity revealed that the LPT overestimated jump height for both SJ (mean difference (MD) = 8.01 ± 2.93 cm) and CMJ (MD = 8.68 ± 2.99 cm). With regards to reliability of the LPT, mean intraclass correlation (ICC) for both SJ (ICC = 0.84) and CMJ (ICC = 0.95) were high, and Bland–Altman analysis showed mean differences lower than minimal detectable change (MDC) between the days for both SJ (MD = 1.89 ± 4.16 cm vs. MDC = 2.72 cm) and CMJ (MD = 0.47 ± 3.23 cm vs. MDC = 2.11 cm). Additionally, there was a low coefficient of variation (CV) between days for both SJ (CV = 3.25%) and CMJ (CV = 0.74%). Therefore, while the LPT overestimates jump height, it is a reliable tool for tracking changes in jump height to measure performance improvement and monitor fatigue.
Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump

A Attia,W Dhahbi,A Chaouachi,J Padulo,D P Wong,K Chamari,DP Wong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2017.63735

2017-01-01

Biology of Sport

Abstract:Common methods to estimate vertical jump height (VJH) are based on the measurements of flight time (FT) or vertical reaction force. This study aimed to assess the measurement errors when estimating the VJH with flight time using photocell devices in comparison with the gold standard jump height measured by a force plate (FP). The second purpose was to determine the intrinsic reliability of the Optojump photoelectric cells in estimating VJH. For this aim, 20 subjects (age: 22.50±1.24 years) performed maximal vertical jumps in three modalities in randomized order: the squat jump (SJ), counter-movement jump (CMJ), and CMJ with arm swing (CMJarm). Each trial was simultaneously recorded by the FP and Optojump devices. High intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for validity (0.98-0.99) and low limits of agreement (less than 1.4 cm) were found; even a systematic difference in jump height was consistently observed between FT and double integration of force methods (-31% to -27%; p<0.001) and a large effect size (Cohen's <i>d</i>>1.2). Intra-session reliability of Optojump was excellent, with ICCs ranging from 0.98 to 0.99, low coefficients of variation (3.98%), and low standard errors of measurement (0.8 cm). It was concluded that there was a high correlation between the two methods to estimate the vertical jump height, but the FT method cannot replace the gold standard, due to the large systematic bias. According to our results, the equations of each of the three jump modalities were presented in order to obtain a better estimation of the jump height.

biology
Validity of vertical jump measurement devices

Matthew Buckthorpe,John Morris,Jonathan P. Folland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2011.624539

IF: 3.9428

2012-01-01

Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract:Vertical jump height is thought to provide a valuable index of muscular power, which is an important factor in sports performance and for assessing the mobility and functional capacity of injured or aged individuals. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the criterion validity of four popular devices for measuring vertical jump height. A belt mat, contact mat, portable force plate, and Vertec were compared to a criterion device, a laboratory force plate. Forty participants performed three maximal countermovement jumps on each device in a counterbalanced order, using block randomization. The criterion device presented the highest mean value (50.3 cm). The portable force plate and belt mat devices recorded similar jump height values to the criterion device (within 1 cm). The contact mat and Vertec devices recorded significantly lower values than the criterion device (P < 0.001). The mean difference ± limits of agreement were: belt mat -0.1 ± 5.5 cm, contact mat -11.7 ± 6.4 cm, portable force plate -0.8 ± 3.9 cm, and Vertec -2.4 ± 6.6 cm. In conclusion, the portable force plate and belt mat devices provided valid measures of vertical jump height, whereas the Vertec and contact mat devices did not.

sport sciences
Reliability and Validity of the Polar V800 Sports Watch for Estimating Vertical Jump Height

Manuel-Vicente Garnacho-Castaño,Marcos Faundez-Zanuy,Noemi Serra-Payá,J. L. Maté-Muñoz,Josep López-Xarbau,M. Vila-Blanch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.16442

IF: 4.506

2022-03-28

Medical Physics

Abstract:This study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Polar V800 to measure vertical jump height. Twenty-two physically active healthy men (age: 22.89 +- 4.23 years; body mass: 70.74 +- 8.04 kg; height: 1.74 +- 0.76 m) were recruited for the study. The reliability was evaluated by comparing measurements acquired by the Polar V800 in two identical testing sessions one week apart. Validity was assessed by comparing measurements simultaneously obtained using a force platform (gold standard), high-speed camera and the Polar V800 during squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) tests. In the test-retest reliability, high intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were observed (mean: 0.90, SJ and CMJ) in the Polar V800. There was no significant systematic bias +- random errors (p > 0.05) between test-retest. Low coefficients of variation (<5%) were detected in both jumps in the Polar V800. In the validity assessment, similar jump height was detected among devices (p > 0.05). There was almost perfect agreement between the Polar V800 compared to a force platform for the SJ and CMJ tests (Mean ICCs = 0.95; no systematic bias +- random errors in SJ mean: -0.38 +- 2.10 cm, p > 0.05). Mean ICC between the Polar V800 versus high-speed camera was 0.91 for the SJ and CMJ tests, however, a significant systematic bias +- random error (0.97 +- 2.60 cm; p = 0.01) was detected in CMJ test. The Polar V800 offers valid, compared to force platform, and reliable information about vertical jump height performance in physically active healthy young men.
Reliability and Validity of the Jumpster accelerometer-based app compared to the Vertec when completing a countermovement jump

Mathew E Holman,Chris Harnish

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.01.616202

2024-10-06

Abstract:The reliability and validity of the Jumpster app (JA) was compared to the Vertec. Thirty-six participants completed 100 total trials using both tools simultaneously. Validity was assessed using correlation and tolerance analyses. Reliability was assessed using 95% predictive intervals (PI95) and tolerance limits (TL95) between the measures, comparing standard error of the measure (SEM) and coefficients of variation (CV) for each tool, and examining the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,K; upper and lower 95% CI) comparing both tools. The JA was weakly related to the Vertec (r = 0.24; p < 0.01). The tolerance analysis showed a moderately strong proportional bias of the JA (r = 0.45; p < 0.01). While all data fell within calculated PI95 ±TL95, the JA SEM (14.7cm) and CV (40.30%) exceeded the Vertec SEM (3.57cm) and CV (7.22%) with an ICC of 0.55 [0.79, -0.08]. These JA is neither reliable or valid.

Biophysics
Reliability and Validity of the Portable KForce Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump (CMJ)

George Plakoutsis,Dimitrios Zapantis,Eirini-Maria Panagiotopoulou,Eleftherios Paraskevopoulos,Maria Moutzouri,George A. Koumantakis,Maria Papandreou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app132011200

2023-10-12

Applied Sciences

Abstract:Physical fitness is of great significance to athletes in both single-player and team sports. The countermovement jump (CMJ) is one of the most commonly applied jump tests for assessing the mechanical capacities of the lower extremities. The KForce Plates system is a portable force platform that sends action-time audio and visual biofeedback to a smartphone or tablet through the KForce application, making it a suitable instrument for assessing the CMJ. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability and validity of the portable force platform (KForce Plates) in the evaluation of the CMJ in collegiate athletes compared to a validated application, My Jump 2. Thirty-four collegiate professional athletes, deriving from various sports backgrounds, participated in the present study. The CMJs were reported with the portable KForce Plates and the simultaneous use of the ‘My Jump 2’ application using an iPhone 13 between days 1 and 7. Our findings revealed high test–retest reliability (ICC = 1.00 and ICC = 0.99) in-between measurements. High correlations were monitored amongst the portable KForce plates and the My Jump 2 application for measuring the CMJ (r = 0.999, p = 0.001). The Bland–Altman plot exhibits the limits of agreement amongst the portable KForce plates and the My Jump 2 application, where the bulk of the data are within the 95% CIs with an agreement of ≈1 cm. Our findings suggest that the portable KForce Plates system is a reliable and valid instrument and, therefore, can be used by experts in the sports field.

materials science, multidisciplinary,engineering,chemistry,physics, applied

An unusual complication of a ventricular pace maker electrode.

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of a Free Smartphone Application for Evaluation of Jump Height

Concurrent Validity and Reliability of My Jump 2 App for Measuring Vertical Jump Height in Recreationally Active Adults

Vertical Jump Height Estimation Algorithm based on Vertical Acceleration Profile Characteristics via Foot-Worn Inertial Sensing.

The validity and reliability of an iPhone app for measuring vertical jump performance

Agreement between Force Platform and Smartphone Application-Derived Measures of Vertical Jump Height in Youth Grassroots Soccer Players

The validity and reliability of the My Jump 2 app for measuring vertical stiffness in male college players

Validity and Reliability of the Orthelligent Pro Sensor for Measuring Single-Leg Vertical Jump Height in Healthy Athletic Adults

The concurrent validity and reliability of the My Jump Lab smartphone app for the real-time measurement of vertical jump performance

Real time estimation of vertical jump height with a markerless motion capture smartphone app: A proof-of-concept case study

Reliability and validity of "My Jump 2" application for countermovement jump free arm and interlimb jump symmetry in different sports of professional athletes

Reliability and Accuracy of Portable Devices for Measuring Countermovement Jump Height in Physically Active Adults: A Comparison of Force Platforms, Contact Mats, and Video-Based Software

Common Vertical Jump and Reactive Strength Index Measuring Devices: A Validity and Reliability Analysis

Concurrent validity and reliability of photoelectric and accelerometer technology for calculating vertical jump height in female athletes

COMPARISON OF VARIOUS DEVICES USED IN THE EVALUATION OF VERTICAL JUMP HEIGHT

Validity and Reliability of the GymAware Linear Position Transducer for Squat Jump and Counter-Movement Jump Height

Measurement errors when estimating the vertical jump height with flight time using photocell devices: the example of Optojump

Validity of vertical jump measurement devices

Reliability and Validity of the Polar V800 Sports Watch for Estimating Vertical Jump Height

Reliability and Validity of the Jumpster accelerometer-based app compared to the Vertec when completing a countermovement jump

Reliability and Validity of the Portable KForce Plates for Measuring Countermovement Jump (CMJ)