Abstract:Background: Mammals, globally, are facing population declines. Protecting and breeding threatened populations inside predator-free havens and translocating them back to the wild is commonly viewed as a solution. These approaches can expose predator-naïve animals to predators they have never encountered and as a result, many conservation projects have failed due to the predation of individuals that lacked appropriate anti-predator responses. Hence, robust ways to measure anti-predator responses are urgently needed to help identify naïve populations at risk, to select appropriate animals for translocation, and to monitor managed populations for changes in anti-predator traits. Here, we undertake a systematic review that collates existing behavioural assays of anti-predator responses and identifies assay types and predator cues that provoke the greatest behavioural responses. Methods: We retrieved articles from academic bibliographic databases and grey literature sources (such as government and conservation management reports), using a Boolean search string. Each article was screened against eligibility criteria determined using the PICO (Population-Intervention-Comparator-Outcome) framework. Using data extracted from each article, we mapped all known behavioural assays for quantifying anti-predator responses in mammals and examined the context in which each assay has been implemented (e.g., species tested, predator cue characteristics). Finally, with mixed effects modelling, we determined which of these assays and predator cue types elicit the greatest behavioural responses based on standardised difference in response between treatment and control groups. Review findings: We reviewed 5168 articles, 211 of which were eligible, constituting 1016 studies on 126 mammal species, a quarter of which are threatened by invasive species. We identified six major types of behavioural assays: behavioural focals, capture probability, feeding station, flight initiation distance, giving-up density, and stimulus presentations. Across studies, there were five primary behaviours measured: activity, escape, exploration, foraging, and vigilance. These behaviours yielded similar effect sizes across studies. With regard to study design, however, studies that used natural olfactory cues tended to report larger effect sizes than those that used artificial cues. Effect sizes were larger in studies that analysed sexes individually, rather than combining males and females. Studies that used 'blank' control treatments (the absence of a stimulus) rather than a treatment with a control stimulus had higher effect sizes. Although many studies involved repeat measures of known individuals, only 15.4% of these used their data to calculate measures of individual repeatability. Conclusions: Our review highlights important aspects of experimental design and reporting that should be considered. Where possible, studies of anti-predator behaviour should use appropriate control treatments, analyse males and females separately, and choose organic predator cues. Studies should also look to report the individual repeatability of behavioural traits, and to correctly identify measures of uncertainty (error bars). The review highlights robust methodology, reveals promising techniques on which to focus future assay development, and collates relevant information for conservation managers.

Deer damage: A review of repellents to reduce impacts worldwide

Non‐lethal control of wildlife: using chemical repellents as feeding deterrents for the European badger Meles meles

How effective are interventions to reduce damage to agricultural crops from herbivorous wild birds and mammals? A systematic review protocol

Applications of chemical bird repellents for crop and resource protection: a review and synthesis

Crop damage by vertebrates in Latin America: current knowledge and potential future management directions

Plant Secondary Metabolites as Rodent Repellents: a Systematic Review

Modelling the spatial abundance of invasive deer and their impacts on vegetation at the landscape scale

Commercial products are not effective at repelling European deer keds, Lipoptena cervi (Diptera: Hippoboscidae) but may increase mortality after exposure

Identifying the most effective behavioural assays and predator cues for quantifying anti-predator responses in mammals: a systematic review

Impacts of Wildlife on Agriculture: A Spatial-Based Analysis and Economic Assessment for Reducing Damage

Intensive professional vehicle-based shooting provides local control of invasive rusa deer in a peri-urban landscape

Climate change and deer in boreal and temperate regions: From physiology to population dynamics and species distributions

Playbacks of Predator Vocalizations Reduce Crop Damage by Ungulates

Differential and interacting impacts of invasive plants and white-tailed deer in eastern U.S. forests

Systematic review of management strategies to control chronic wasting disease in wild deer populations in North America

Reducing risky interactions: Identifying barriers to the successful management of human–wildlife conflict in an urban parkland

A review of urban wildlife management from the animal personality perspective: The case of urban deer

Global review of anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in wild mammalian carnivores

Visit, investigate, ignore: Olfactory misinformation reduces browsing damage to valued seedlings by a mammalian herbivore

Using animal–vehicle collision data for wildlife population monitoring

A regional assessment of white-tailed deer effects on plant invasion