Assessment of mandibular characteristics in patients affected with β-thalassaemia major: A retrospective case-control study

Najmeh Movahhedian,Fatemeh Akbarizadeh,Leila Khojastepour,Ahmad Reza Sardarian,Hamid Reza Pakshir,Farzaneh Ahrari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2020.06.008

Abstract:Objective: Thalassemia is the most common hereditary blood disorder across the world. This study aimed to identify some mandibular features of thalassaemic patients and compare them with unaffected counterparts. Material and methods: This retrospective case-control study was carried out on lateral cephalograms of 60 subjects (26 males, 34 females) with class II malocclusion and age range of 11 to 15 years. The control group consisted of 60 non-thalassaemic subjects with class II malocclusion and similar chronological age, gender and vertical facial dimension. Based on the Jarabak index, the case and control subjects were classified into hyperdivergent, normodivergent and hypodivergent growth patterns. Four linear (ramus height, ramus width, mandibular depth, and antegonial notch depth) and 3 angular (symphyseal angle, gonial angle, and mandibular arc angle) cephalometric parameters were measured to represent mandibular morphology. The data were analysed using Chi-square test and Student's t-test. Results: No significant difference was found in linear measurements between thalassaemic patients and controls. The symphysis angle was significantly greater and the mandibular arc angle was significantly smaller in the total thalassaemic sample than the control individuals (P<0.001 and P=0.004, respectively). The difference in symphysis angle was significant in both hyperdivergent and normodivergent subjects (P=0.004 and P=0.002, respectively), whereas the difference in mandibular arc angle was only significant in the normodivergent subgroup P=0.001). Conclusions: The smaller mandibular arc angle in the thalassaemic sample suggests a more superior than posterior growth direction of condyles compared with healthy individuals. The difference in symphyseal angle represents inherent differences in chin morphology between thalassaemic subjects and controls.