A study of benthic communities in some shallow saline lakes of western Victoria, Australia

B. Timms

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025186

IF: 2.822

1983-09-01

Hydrobiologia

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Viral Filtration Efficiency of Fabric Masks Compared with Surgical and N95 Masks

Harriet Whiley,Thilini Piushani Keerthirathne,Muhammad Atif Nisar,Mae A F White,Kirstin E Ross,Mae A. F. White,Kirstin E. Ross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9090762

IF: 3.7

2020-09-17

Pathogens

Abstract:In response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, current modeling supports the use of masks in community settings to reduce the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. However, concerns have been raised regarding the global shortage of medical grade masks and the limited evidence on the efficacy of fabric masks. This study used a standard mask testing method (ASTM F2101-14) and a model virus (bacteriophage MS2) to test the viral filtration efficiency (VFE) of fabric masks compared with commercially available disposable, surgical, and N95 masks. Five different types of fabric masks were purchased from the ecommerce website Etsy to represent a range of different fabric mask designs and materials currently available. One mask included a pocket for a filter; which was tested without a filter, with a dried baby wipe, and a section of a vacuum cleaner bag. A sixth fabric mask was also made according to the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) guidelines (Australia). Three masks of each type were tested. This study found that all the fabric masks had a VFE of at least 50% when tested against aerosols with an average size of 6.0 μm (VFE(6.0 μm)). The minimum VFE of fabric masks improved (to 63%) when the larger aerosols were excluded to give and average aerosol size of 2.6 μm (VFE(2.6 μm)), which better represents inhaled aerosols that can reach the lower respiratory system. The best performing fabric masks were the cotton mask with a section of vacuum cleaner bag (VFE(6.0 μm) = 99.5%, VFE(2.6 μm) = 98.8%) or a dried baby wipe (VFE(6.0 μm) = 98.5%, VFE(2.6 μm) = 97.6%) in the pocket designed for a disposable filter, the mask made using the Victorian DHHS design (VFE(6.0 μm) = 98.6%, VFE(2.6 μm) =99.1%) and one made from a layer of 100% hemp, a layer of poly membrane, and a layer of cheesecloth (VFE(6.0 μm) = 93.6%, VFE(2.6 μm) = 89.0%). The VFE of two surgical masks (VFE(6.0 μm) = 99.9% and 99.6%, VFE(2.6 μm) = 99.5% and 98.5%) and a N95 masks (VFE(6.0 μm) = 99.9%, VFE(2.6 μm) = 99.3%) were comparable to their advertised bacterial filtration efficacy. This research supports the use of fabric masks in the community to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2; however, future research is needed to explore the optimum design in ensuring proper fit. There is also a need for mass education campaigns to disseminate this information, along with guidelines around the proper usage and washing of fabric masks.

microbiology
Properties of materials considered for improvised masks

Steven N. Rogak,Timothy A. Sipkens,Mark Guan,Hamed Nikookar,Daniela Vargas Figueroa,Jing Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1855321

2020-12-28

Aerosol Science and Technology

Abstract:<span>During a pandemic in which aerosol and droplet transmission is possible, such as the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, the demand for face masks that meet medical or workplace standards can prevent most individuals from obtaining suitable protection. Cloth masks are widely believed to impede droplet and aerosol transmission, but most are constructed from materials with unknown filtration efficiency, airflow resistance and water resistance. Here we provide data on a range of common fabrics that might be used to construct masks, complimenting existing studies by largely considering particles in the micron range (a plausible challenge size for human generated aerosols). None of the materials were suitable for N95 masks, but many could provide useful filtration (>90%) of 3 micron particles, with low pressure drop. These were: nonwoven sterile wraps, dried baby wipes and some double-knit cotton materials. Decontamination of N95 masks using isopropyl alcohol produces the expected increase in particle penetration, but for 3 micron particles, filtration efficiency is still well above 95%. Tightly woven thin fabrics, despite having the visual appearance of a good particle barrier, had remarkably low filtration efficiency and high pressure drop. The better material structures expose individual fibers to the flow while the poor materials may have small fundamental fibers but these are in tightly bundled yarns. Despite the complexity of the design of a very good mask, it is clear that for the larger aerosol particles, any mask will provide substantial protection to the wearer and those around them.Copyright © 2020 American Association for Aerosol Research</span>

environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,engineering, chemical, mechanical
Selection of homemade mask materials for preventing transmission of COVID-19: A laboratory study

Dijia Wang,Yanjun You,Xiaoli Zhou,Zhiyong Zong,Hao Huang,Hui Zhang,Xin Yong,Yifan Cheng,Liu Yang,Qiong Guo,Youlin Long,Yan Liu,Jin Huang,Liang Du

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240285

IF: 3.7

2020-10-15

PLoS ONE

Abstract:The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has swept the whole world with high mortality. Since droplet transmission is the main route of transmission, wearing a mask serves as a crucial preventive measure. However, the virus has spread quite quickly, causing severe mask shortage. Finding alternative materials for homemade masks while ensuring the significant performance indicators will help alleviate the shortage of masks. Referring to the national standard for the "Surgical Mask" of China, 17 materials to be selected for homemade masks were tested in four key indicators: pressure difference, particle filtration efficiency, bacterial filtration efficiency and resistance to surface wetting. Eleven single-layer materials met the standard of pressure difference (≤49 Pa), of which 3 met the standard of resistance to surface wetting (≥3), 1 met the standard of particle filtration efficiency (≥30%), but none met the standard of bacterial filtration efficiency (≥95%). Based on the testing results of single-layer materials, fifteen combinations of paired materials were tested. The results showed that three double-layer materials including double-layer medical non-woven fabric, medical non-woven fabric plus non-woven shopping bag, and medical non-woven fabric plus granular tea towel could meet all the standards of pressure difference, particle filtration efficiency, and resistance to surface wetting, and were close to the standard of the bacterial filtration efficiency. In conclusion, if resources are severely lacking and medical masks cannot be obtained, homemade masks using available materials, based on the results of this study, can minimize the chance of infection to the maximum extent.

multidisciplinary sciences
Evaluation of masks and mask material suitability for bioaerosol capture

Arman Peyravi,Emily Quecke,Elena Kosareva,Patricia Dolez,Alexander Doroshenko,Stephanie Smith,Bernadette Quemerais,Zaher Hashisho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2024.2394613

2024-10-05

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

Abstract:Non-medical masks such as disposable non-medical, commercially produced cloth, and homemade masks are not regulated like surgical masks. Their performance, in terms of filtration efficiency and breathability, is variable and unreliable. This research provides a quantitative evaluation of various non-medical masks, assesses their fabrics' potential for the reduction of transmission of bioaerosols such as the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and compares them to surgical masks and N95 filtering facepiece respirators. Using a testing line with a NaCl challenge aerosol, four types of commercial reusable cloth masks, two types of disposable non-medical masks, three types of surgical or N95 masks, and seven types of commonly available materials were tested individually and in combinations. The testing line and procedure were adapted from the ASTM F2299-03: Standard Test Method for Determining the Initial Efficiency of Materials Used in Medical Face Masks to Penetration by Particulates Using Latex Spheres testing method used for testing surgical masks. Filtration efficiencies at 0.15 μm particle diameter at a face velocity of 25 cm/sec for commercial cloth masks, disposable non-medical masks, surgical masks, commercial mask combinations, and homemade combinations ranged from 16–29%, 39–76%, 91–97%, 51–95%, and 45–94%, respectively. The pressure drop results for the different masks and material combinations were all under 3 mm H 2 O/cm 2 except for one material configuration. This study builds on other research that looks at individual materials and masks by testing combinations alongside the individual masks and materials. With proper layering, household materials can achieve the filtration efficiency and low pressure drop requirements of surgical masks. The filtration capabilities of disposable and cloth mask fabrics vary considerably meaning that they are not a reliable or consistent facemask option, regardless of fit.

environmental sciences,public, environmental & occupational health
Longitudinal Study of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, and Changes in Traumatic Memories Over Time in Bosnian Refugees

R. Mollica,Kathleen Rey Caridad,M. Massagli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0b013e318093ed2c

2007-07-01

Abstract:This longitudinal study examined traumatic memory consistency over a 3-year period among a sample of highly traumatized Bosnian refugees, focusing on demographic factors, types of trauma, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. In 1996 and 1999, 376 Bosnian refugees were interviewed about 54 wartime trauma and torture events, and symptoms of PTSD and depression. Reports were compared for both time periods, and changed responses were analyzed for significance. Overall, there was consistency in reporting over time; when change occurred it was in the direction of decreased reports at follow-up. This downward trend was not associated with any particular diagnosis. However, PTSD alone, without comorbid symptoms of depression, was uniquely associated with the group that exhibited an upward trend. This implies that increased reporting is related specifically to the presence of PTSD symptoms, and that PTSD may be distinctly associated with the failed extinction of traumatic memories.
Filtration performances of non-medical materials as candidates for manufacturing facemasks and respirators

Weixing Hao,Andrew Parasch,Stephen Williams,Jiayu Li,Hongyan Ma,Joel Burken,Yang Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113582

IF: 7.401

2020-08-01

International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

Abstract:<p>The recent outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is causing a shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) in different countries around the world. Because the coronavirus can transmit through droplets and aerosols, facemasks and N95 respirators that require complex certification, are urgently needed. Given the situation, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that "in settings where facemasks are not available, healthcare personnel might use homemade masks (e.g., bandana, scarf) for the care of patients with COVID-19 as a last resort." Although aerosols and droplets can be removed through the fibers of fabrics through a series of filtration mechanisms, their filtration performances have not been evaluated in detail. Moreover, there are a series of non-medical materials available on the market, such as household air filters, coffee filters, and different types of fabrics, which may be useful when facemasks and respirators are not available. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated the overall and size-dependent filtration performances of non-medical materials. The experiments were conducted under different face velocities to study its influence on size-dependent filtration performances. The flow resistance across these filter materials is measured as an indicator of the breathability of the materials. The results illustrate that multiple layers of household air filters are able to achieve similar filtration efficiencies compared to the N95 material without causing a significant increase in flow resistance. Considering that these air filters may shed micrometer fibers during the cutting and folding processes, it is recommended that these filters should be inserted in multiple layers of fabrics when manufacturing facemasks or respirators.</p>

infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
Particle-Size-Dependent Filtration Efficiency, Breathability, and Flow Resistance of Face Coverings and Common Household Fabrics Used for Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Olukayode James Ayodeji,Terrell A. Hilliard,Seshadri Ramkumar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-021-00390-6

2022-01-10

International Journal of Environmental Research

Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, the increase in demand for protective equipment caused a global shortage and homemade barrier face coverings were recommended as alternatives. However, filtration performances of homemade face coverings have not been fully evaluated. Test methods in the ASTM standard (F3502-21) were used to evaluate filtration efficiencies (FE) and breathability (pressure drop, Δp) of face coverings and home fabric materials commonly used during the pandemic. Submicron particulates FE was measured by particle transmission through face covering samples using a Condensation Particle Counter equipped with differential mobility analyzer and electronic manometer. Flow resistance of 0.1 μm-diameter fluorescent nanoparticles in droplets was determined by measuring fluorescence intensity of residual collected at the reverse side of samples. The size-dependent FE (3–94%) and Δp (0.8–72 mmH2O) varied considerably among fabrics. Of the 16 mask types, 31.25% and 81.25% met the minimum FE and breathability standards in the ASTM F3502-21, respectively. Overall performance (qF) was highest for velcro masks (max qF = 3.36, min qF = 2.80) and lowest for Dutch wax print fabrics (max qF = 0.12, min qF = 0.03). Most of the samples resisted the flow of 0.1 µm-diameter nanoparticles in droplets. Low flow resistance was observed in bandana, neck gaiter, t-shirt I, tank top and bedspread fabrics. GSM and fabric finishing seems to affect performance. Low performances can be improved by selecting optimum-performance fabrics in the design and manufacture of barrier face coverings.

environmental sciences
Size-Dependent Filtration Efficiency of Alternative Facemask Filter Materials

David I. A. Dhanraj,Shruti Choudhary,Udayabhanu Jammalamadaka,David H. Ballard,Benjamin M. Kumfer,Audrey J. Dang,Brent J. Williams,Kathleen W. Meacham,Richard L. Axelbaum,Pratim Biswas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14081868

IF: 3.4

2021-04-09

Materials

Abstract:The use of facemasks is proven to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus and other biological agents that cause disease. Various forms of facemasks, made using different materials, are being used extensively, and it is important to determine their performance characteristics. The size-dependent filtration efficiency and breathing resistance of household sterilization wrap fabrics, and isolation media (American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)- and non-ASTM-rated), were measured in filter-holder- and mannequin-in-chamber-based systems, focusing on particles sizes between 20 nm and 2 μm. Double-layer MERV-14 (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Values with rating 14) showed the highest filtration efficiency (94.9–73.3%) amongst household filter media, whereas ASTM-rated isolation masks showed the highest filtration efficiencies (95.6–88.7) amongst all the masks considered. Filtration efficiency of 3D-printed masks with replaceable filter media was found to depend on the degree of sealing around the media holder, which depended on the material’s compressibility. Filtration efficiencies of triple-layer combinations (95.8–85.3%) follow a profile similar to single layers but with improved filtration efficiencies.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
Evaluating the filtration efficiency of commercial facemasks' materials against respiratory aerosol droplets

Satya S Patra,Jyotishree Nath,Subhasmita Panda,Trupti Das,Boopathy Ramasamy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2021.1948459

Abstract:Respiratory droplets serve as a viable transmission mechanism for many viruses and other pathogens. Facemasks are commonly used to minimize the risk of this transmission. However, information on the size-resolved filtration efficiency of commonly available commercial facemasks is not readily available in the literature. To fill this gap, the current study performs aerosolized chamber experiments to evaluate the filtration efficiencies of commonly available commercial facemasks' materials in a size range of 0.3-10 µm. Results rank the performance of filtration through commercial facemasks' materials as follows (values in brackets indicate the average filtration efficiencies across 0.3-10 µm): 6-Layer N95 mask (0.918) > N95 mask - without valve (0.88) > KN95 mask (0.84) > N95 mask -with valve (0.834) > Heavy knitted cotton mask (0.808) > Surgical mask (0.778) > Cotton mask-2 layers (0.744) > Nylon fabric mask-2 layers (0.740) > T-shirt fabric mask-2 layers (0.708) > T-shirt fabric mask-1 layer (0.648). The size-resolved filtration efficiencies through the material across the evaluated commercial facemasks ranged from 38-83% in the size range of 0.3-0.5 µm, 55-88% in the size range of 0.5-1 µm, 69-93% in the size range of 1-2.5 µm, 76-96% in the size range of 2.5-5 µm, and 86-99% in the size range of 5-10 µm. Subsequently, the filtration efficiencies of materials post washing (with detergent in warm water and allowing to dry completely) were also evaluated. The average reduction in filtration efficiencies post washing are as follows: 6-Layer N95 mask: 3%, N95 mask - without valve: 2%, KN95 mask: 4%, N95 mask -with valve: 3%, Heavy knitted cotton mask: 4%, Surgical mask: 18%, Cotton mask-2 layers: 11%, Nylon fabric mask-2 layers: 6%, T-shirt fabric mask-2 layers: 6%, T-shirt fabric mask-1 layer: 8%. This decrease in the filtration efficiency was more pronounced for the sub-micron particles than the super-micron ones.Implications: Facemasks are commonly used to minimize the risk of pathogens through ambient air transmission. However, information on the size-resolved filtration efficiency of commonly available commercial facemasks materials is not readily available in the literature. To fill this gap, the current study performs aerosolized chamber experiments to evaluate the filtration efficiencies of commonly available commercial facemasks materials in a size range of 0.3-10 µm. The performance of the commercial facemasks materials as follows in the order of (values in brackets indicate the average filtration efficiencies across 0.3-10 µm): 6-Layer N95 mask (0.918) > N95 mask - without valve (0.88) > KN95 mask (0.84) > N95 mask -with valve (0.834) > Heavy knitted cotton mask (0.808) > Surgical mask (0.778) > Cotton mask-2 layers (0.744) > Nylon fabric mask-2 layers (0.740) > T-shirt fabric mask-2 layers (0.708) > T-shirt fabric mask-1 layer (0.648). The choice of facemask is greatly driven by the size of viable respiratory droplets that need to be eliminated. If droplets with particle size less than 0.5 µm are required to be filtered, N95 masks without the valve or more layers are preferred. If the primary objective is to filter particles between 0.5-1 µm, then N95 (both with or without valves) or KN95 masks are recommended. Surgical masks and heavy knitted cotton masks may also be used for this purpose, but with caution.
Review of the Breathability and Filtration Efficiency of Common Household Materials for Face Masks

Laura H. Kwong,Rob Wilson,Shailabh Kumar,Yoshika Susan Crider,Yasmin Reyes Sanchez,David Rempel,Ajay Pillarisetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c10146

IF: 17.1

2021-04-06

ACS Nano

Abstract:The World Health Organization and the United States Centers for Disease Control have recommended universal face masking by the general public to slow the spread of COVID-19. A number of recent studies have evaluated the filtration efficiency and pressure differential (an indicator of breathability) of various, widely available materials that the general public can use to make face masks at home. In this review, we summarize those studies to provide guidance for both the public to select the best materials for face masks and for future researchers to rigorously evaluate and report on mask material testing. Of the tested fabric materials and material combinations with adequate breathability, most single and multilayer combinations had a filtration efficiency of <30%. Most studies evaluating commonly available mask materials did not follow standard methods that would facilitate comparison across studies, and materials were often described with too few details to allow consumers to purchase equivalent materials to make their own masks. To improve the usability of future study results, researchers should use standard methods and report material characteristics in detail.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c10146?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.0c10146</a>.Terms used for combining measurements of pressure differential and filtration efficiency; effect of face velocity and layers on pressure differential; detailed summaries of studies that assessed the penetration of bacteria and other nonstandard particles (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsnano.0c10146/suppl_file/nn0c10146_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,nanoscience & nanotechnology
Testing of Commercial Masks and Respirators and Cotton Mask Insert Materials using SARS-CoV-2 Virion-Sized Particulates: Comparison of Ideal Aerosol Filtration Efficiency versus Fitted Filtration Efficiency

W. Cary Hill,Matthew S. Hull,Robert I. MacCuspie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03182

IF: 10.8

2020-09-28

Nano Letters

Abstract:Shortages in the availability of personal protective face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic required many to fabricate masks and filter inserts from available materials. While the base filtration efficiency of a material is of primary importance when a perfect seal is possible, ideal fit is not likely to be achieved by the average person preparing to enter a public space or even a healthcare worker without fit-testing before each shift. Our findings suggest that parameters including permeability and pliability can play a strong role in the filtration efficiency of a mask fabricated with various filter media, and that the filtration efficiency of loosely fitting masks/respirators against ultrafine particulates can drop by more than 60% when worn compared to the ideal filtration efficiency of the base material. Further, a test method using SARS-CoV-2 virion-sized silica nanoaerosols is demonstrated to assess the filtration efficiency against nanoparticulates that follow air currents associated with mask leakage.This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,nanoscience & nanotechnology
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks

Abhiteja Konda,Abhinav Prakash,Gregory A. Moss,Michael Schmoldt,Gregory D. Grant,Supratik Guha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03252

IF: 17.1

2020-04-24

ACS Nano

Abstract:The emergence of a pandemic affecting the respiratory system can result in a significant demand for face masks. This includes the use of cloth masks by large sections of the public, as can be seen during the current global spread of COVID-19. However, there is limited knowledge available on the performance of various commonly available fabrics used in cloth masks. Importantly, there is a need to evaluate filtration efficiencies as a function of aerosol particulate sizes in the 10 nm to 10 μm range, which is particularly relevant for respiratory virus transmission. We have carried out these studies for several common fabrics including cotton, silk, chiffon, flannel, various synthetics, and their combinations. Although the filtration efficiencies for various fabrics when a single layer was used ranged from 5 to 80% and 5 to 95% for particle sizes of <300 nm and >300 nm, respectively, the efficiencies improved when multiple layers were used and when using a specific combination of different fabrics. Filtration efficiencies of the hybrids (such as cotton–silk, cotton–chiffon, cotton–flannel) was >80% (for particles <300 nm) and >90% (for particles >300 nm). We speculate that the enhanced performance of the hybrids is likely due to the combined effect of mechanical and electrostatic-based filtration. Cotton, the most widely used material for cloth masks performs better at higher weave densities (<i>i.e.</i>, thread count) and can make a significant difference in filtration efficiencies. Our studies also imply that gaps (as caused by an improper fit of the mask) can result in over a 60% decrease in the filtration efficiency, implying the need for future cloth mask design studies to take into account issues of "fit" and leakage, while allowing the exhaled air to vent efficiently. Overall, we find that combinations of various commonly available fabrics used in cloth masks can potentially provide significant protection against the transmission of aerosol particles.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,nanoscience & nanotechnology
Comprehensive characterization of protective face coverings made from household fabrics

Suvajyoti Guha,Alexander Herman,Ian A. Carr,Daniel Porter,Rucha Natu,Shayna Berman,Matthew R. Myers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244626

IF: 3.7

2021-01-13

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background Face coverings constitute an important strategy for containing pandemics, such as COVID-19. Infection from airborne respiratory viruses including Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can occur in at least three modes; tiny and/or dried aerosols (typically 0.5 μm) generated during coughing and sneezing, and macro drops transmitted via fomites. While there is a growing number of studies looking at the performance of household materials against some of these situations, to date, there has not been any systematic characterization of household materials against all three modes. Methods A three-step methodology was developed and used to characterize the performance of 21 different household materials with various material compositions (e.g. cotton, polyester, polypropylene, cellulose and blends) using submicron sodium chloride aerosols, water droplets, and mucous mimicking macro droplets over an aerosol-droplet size range of ~ 20 nm to 0.6 cm. Results Except for one thousand-thread-count cotton, most single-layered materials had filtration efficiencies 80% of larger droplets, even at sneeze-velocities of up to 1700 cm/s. Three or four layers of the same material, or combination materials, would be required to stop macro droplets from permeating out or into the face covering. Such materials can also be boiled for reuse. Conclusion Four layers of loosely knit or woven fabrics independent of the composition (e.g. cotton, polyester, nylon or blends) are likely to be effective source controls. One layer of tightly woven fabrics combined with multiple layers of loosely knit or woven fabrics in addition to being source controls can have sub-micron filtration efficiencies > 40% and may offer some protection to the wearer. However, the pressure drop across such fabrics can be high (> 100 Pa).

multidisciplinary sciences
Filtering Efficiency of Sustainable Textile Materials Applied in Personal Protective Face Mask Production during Pandemic

Attila Géczy,Gergő Havellant,Réka Bátorfi,Agata Skwarek,Karel Dušek,David Bušek,Balázs Illés

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16030903

IF: 3.4

2023-01-18

Materials

Abstract:The COVID-19 outbreak increased demand for personal protective respirator masks. Textile masks based on cloth materials appeared to be a sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective alternative available in global communities. In this study, we used laser-based particle counting for mask material qualification to determine the concentration filtering efficiency in general, everyday community use. The efficiencies of eleven different commercially available textile materials were measured in single-, double-, and triple-layer configurations according to their grammage, mesh (XY), and inter-yarn gap. It was found that in the single-layer configurations, most materials were well below the acceptable standards, with a wide variation in filtering efficiency, which ranged from 5% to ~50%. However, when testing the fabrics in two or three layers, the efficiency increased significantly, exceeding or approaching the standard for medical masks. Three layers of natural silk was able to produce a level of filtration efficiency of 84.68%. Two-layered natural silk achieved 70.98%, cotton twill achieved 75.6%, and satin-weave viscose achieved 69.77%. Further options can also be considered in cases where lower filtration is acceptable It was statistically shown that applying a second layer was more significant in terms of overall filtering than increasing the layer count to three. However, layer stacking limited the breathability. The paper presents measurement-based qualitative and quantitative recommendations for future textile applications in face mask manufacturing.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
Inulinase activity ofDebaromyces cantarellii

I. Beluche,J. Guiraud,P. Galzy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02876395

Abstract:
Last-resort strategies during mask shortages: optimal design features of cloth masks and decontamination of disposable masks during the COVID-19 pandemic

Shovon Bhattacharjee,Prateek Bahl,Abrar Ahmad Chughtai,C Raina MacIntyre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000698

2020-09-01

BMJ Open Respiratory Research

Abstract:Face masks and respirators are the most widely used intervention measures for respiratory protection. In the wake of COVID-19, in response to shortages and lack of availability of surgical masks and respirators, the use of cloth masks has become a research focus. Various fabrics have been promoted with little evidence-based foundation and without guidelines on design principles for optimal performance. In these circumstances, it is essential to understand the properties, key performance factors, filter mechanisms and evidence on cloth masks materials. The general community might also need to decontaminate and reuse disposable, single-use devices as a last resort. We present an overview of the filter materials, filter mechanisms and effectiveness, key performance factors, and hydrophobicity of the common disposable masks, as well as cloth masks. We also reviewed decontamination methods for disposable respiratory devices. As an alternative to surgical masks and respirators, we recommend a cloth mask made of at least three layers (300–350 threads per inch) and adding a nylon stocking layer over the mask for a better fit. Water-resistant fabrics (polyesters/nylon), blends of fabrics and water-absorbing fabrics (cotton) should be in the outside layer, middle layer/layers and inside layer, respectively. The information outlined here will help people to navigate their choices if facing shortages of appropriate respiratory protection during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Evaluation of Cloth Masks and Modified Procedure Masks as Personal Protective Equipment for the Public During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Phillip W Clapp,Emily E Sickbert-Bennett,James M Samet,Jon Berntsen,Kirby L Zeman,Deverick J Anderson,David J Weber,William D Bennett,US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenters Program

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8168

2021-04-01

Abstract:Importance: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the general public has been advised to wear masks or improvised face coverings to limit transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, there has been considerable confusion and disagreement regarding the degree to which masks protect the wearer from airborne particles. Objectives: To evaluate the fitted filtration efficiency (FFE) of various consumer-grade and improvised face masks, as well as several popular modifications of medical procedure masks that are intended to improve mask fit or comfort. Design, setting, and participants: For this study conducted in a research laboratory between June and August 2020, 7 consumer-grade masks and 5 medical procedure mask modifications were fitted on an adult male volunteer, and FFE measurements were collected during a series of repeated movements of the torso, head, and facial muscles as outlined by the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration Quantitative Fit Testing Protocol. The consumer-grade masks tested included (1) a 2-layer nylon mask with ear loops that was tested with an optional aluminum nose bridge and filter insert in place, (2) a cotton bandana folded diagonally once (ie, "bandit" style) or in a (3) multilayer rectangle according to the instructions presented by the US Surgeon General, (4) a single-layer polyester/nylon mask with ties, (5) a polypropylene mask with fixed ear loops, (6) a single-layer polyester gaiter/neck cover balaclava bandana, and (7) a 3-layer cotton mask with ear loops. Medical procedure mask modifications included (1) tying the mask's ear loops and tucking in the side pleats, (2) fastening ear loops behind the head with 3-dimensional-printed ear guards, (3) fastening ear loops behind the head with a claw-type hair clip, (4) enhancing the mask/face seal with rubber bands over the mask, and (5) enhancing the mask/face seal with a band of nylon hosiery over the fitted mask. Main outcomes and measures: The primary study outcome was the measured FFE of common consumer-grade and improvised face masks, as well as several popular modifications of medical procedure masks. Results: The mean (SD) FFE of consumer grade masks tested on 1 adult male with no beard ranged from 79.0% (4.3%) to 26.5% (10.5%), with the 2-layer nylon mask having the highest FFE. Unmodified medical procedure masks with ear loops had a mean (SD) FFE of 38.5% (11.2%). All modifications evaluated in this study increased procedure mask FFE (range [SD], 60.3% [11.1%] to 80.2% [3.1%]), with a nylon hosiery sleeve placed over the procedure mask producing the greatest improvement. Conclusions and relevance: While modifications to improve medical procedure mask fit can enhance the filtering capability and reduce inhalation of airborne particles, this study demonstrates that the FFEs of consumer-grade masks available to the public are, in many cases, nearly equivalent to or better than their non-N95 respirator medical mask counterparts.
Filtration efficiency, breathability, and reusability of improvised materials for face masks

Morteza H. Bagheri,Iman Khalaji,Arad Azizi,Rebecca T. Loibl,Natalia Basualdo,Scott Manzo,Madhu L. Gorrepati,Shilpa Mehendale,Catherine Mohr,Scott N. Schiffres

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2021.1898537

2021-03-23

Aerosol Science and Technology

Abstract:<span>The goal of this study is to evaluate the filtration efficiency and breathability of improvised filtration and commonly available mask materials, as well as to assess their reusability. Materials readily available to the general public such as cotton, fragrance and additive-free dry baby cleaning wipes, and those abundantly available in the hospital setting, such as sterilization wraps, were chosen for testing, amongst others. In the COVID-important 2–5 µm particle range, two-layers of cotton provided filtration efficiency between 34%–66%. Amongst potential filter materials, 300-weight sterilization wraps provided approximately 80% filtration efficiency and are readily available in the healthcare setting. The addition of sterilization wrap to cotton fabrics brought the filtration efficiency to above that of the sterilization wrap (80%–90%) at the expense of added pressure drop. Four-layers of dry baby wipes performed very well with a filtration efficiency of 85% and a reasonable pressure drop (1/3 of procedure mask). Since the material is advertised as pure spunlace polypropylene and designed to contact the skin during cleaning, it would appear generally safe as a filter insert. Of improvised filters, polypropylene electrostatic HVAC filters performed the best with filtration efficiencies of >99%, but are not recommended due to the risk of confusion with glass-based HVAC filters and uncertainty regarding trace materials used in the filter. The filtration efficiency of two-layers of cotton fabrics with one-layer of sterilization wrap slightly improved over 10 laundry cycles, while the performance of other non-wovens, like dry baby wipes, degraded more rapidly and should be considered disposable. In summary, we found that two-layers of cotton fabric can provide a comfortable, breathable and reusable option. The addition of a sterilization wrap or four-layers of pure spunlace fragrance free dry baby wipes can significantly improve filtration and block expiratory aerosols at the expense of an added pressure drop.Copyright © 2021 American Association for Aerosol Research</span>

environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,engineering, chemical, mechanical
Filtration Efficiency of Hospital Face Mask Alternatives Available for Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Emily E. Sickbert-Bennett,James M. Samet,Phillip W. Clapp,Hao Chen,Jon Berntsen,Kirby L. Zeman,Haiyan Tong,David J. Weber,William D. Bennett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4221

2020-12-01

JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract:<h3>Importance</h3><p>Procuring respiratory protection for clinicians and other health care workers has become a major challenge of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and has resulted in nonstandard practices such as the use of expired respirators and various decontamination processes to prolong the useful life of respirators in health care settings. In addition, imported, non–National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved respirators have been donated or acquired by hospitals as a potential replacement for limited NIOSH-approved N95 respirators.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess fitted filtration efficiencies (FFEs) for face mask alternatives used during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><p>For this quality-improvement study conducted between April and June 2020, we used the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Quantitative Fit Testing Protocol for Filtering Facepiece Respirators in a laboratory atmosphere supplemented with sodium chloride particles to assess the FFEs of a variety of respirators worn by a male volunteer and female volunteer.</p><h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><p>The FFEs of respirators commonly worn by clinicians and other health care workers and available respirator alternatives during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 29 different fitted face mask alternatives tested on 1 man and 1 woman, expired N95 respirators with intact elastic straps and respirators subjected to ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide sterilization had unchanged FFE (>95%). The performance of N95 respirators in the wrong size had slightly decreased performance (90%-95% FFE). All of the respirators not listed as approved in this evaluation (n = 6) failed to achieve 95% FFE. Neither of the 2 imported respirators authorized for use by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that were not NIOSH-approved tested in this study achieved 95% FFE, and the more effective of the 2 functioned at approximately 80% FFE. Surgical and procedural face masks had filtering performance that was lower relative to that of N95 respirators (98.5% overall FFE), with procedural face masks secured with elastic ear loops showing the lowest efficiency (38.1% overall FFE).</p><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><p>This quality-improvement study evaluating 29 face mask alternatives for use by clinicians interacting with patients during the COVID-19 pandemic found that expired N95 respirators and sterilized, used N95 respirators can be used when new N95 respirators are not available. Other alternatives may provide less effective filtration.</p>

medicine, general & internal

A study of benthic communities in some shallow saline lakes of western Victoria, Australia

Viral Filtration Efficiency of Fabric Masks Compared with Surgical and N95 Masks

Properties of materials considered for improvised masks

Selection of homemade mask materials for preventing transmission of COVID-19: A laboratory study

Evaluation of masks and mask material suitability for bioaerosol capture

Longitudinal Study of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, and Changes in Traumatic Memories Over Time in Bosnian Refugees

Filtration performances of non-medical materials as candidates for manufacturing facemasks and respirators

Particle-Size-Dependent Filtration Efficiency, Breathability, and Flow Resistance of Face Coverings and Common Household Fabrics Used for Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Size-Dependent Filtration Efficiency of Alternative Facemask Filter Materials

Evaluating the filtration efficiency of commercial facemasks' materials against respiratory aerosol droplets

Review of the Breathability and Filtration Efficiency of Common Household Materials for Face Masks

Testing of Commercial Masks and Respirators and Cotton Mask Insert Materials using SARS-CoV-2 Virion-Sized Particulates: Comparison of Ideal Aerosol Filtration Efficiency versus Fitted Filtration Efficiency

Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks

Comprehensive characterization of protective face coverings made from household fabrics

Filtering Efficiency of Sustainable Textile Materials Applied in Personal Protective Face Mask Production during Pandemic

Inulinase activity ofDebaromyces cantarellii

Last-resort strategies during mask shortages: optimal design features of cloth masks and decontamination of disposable masks during the COVID-19 pandemic

Evaluation of Cloth Masks and Modified Procedure Masks as Personal Protective Equipment for the Public During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Filtration efficiency, breathability, and reusability of improvised materials for face masks

Filtration Efficiency of Hospital Face Mask Alternatives Available for Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic