Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health
Andrew M Briggs,Carmen Huckel Schneider,Helen Slater,Joanne E Jordan,Sarika Parambath,James J Young,Saurab Sharma,Deborah Kopansky-Giles,Swatee Mishrra,Kristina E Akesson,Nuzhat Ali,Joletta Belton,Neil Betteridge,Fiona M Blyth,Richard Brown,Demelash Debere,Karsten E Dreinhöfer,Laura Finucane,Helen E Foster,Francesca Gimigliano,Scott Haldeman,Syed A Haq,Ben Horgan,Anil Jain,Manjul Joshipura,Asgar A Kalla,Jakob Lothe,Shuichi Matsuda,Ali Mobasheri,Lillian Mwaniki,Margareta C Nordin,Marilyn Pattison,Felipe J J Reis,Enrique R Soriano,Heather Tick,James Waddell,Dieter Wiek,Anthony D Woolf,Lyn March
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006045
Abstract:Introduction: Despite the profound burden of disease, a strategic global response to optimise musculoskeletal (MSK) health and guide national-level health systems strengthening priorities remains absent. Auspiced by the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health (G-MUSC), we aimed to empirically derive requisite priorities and components of a strategic response to guide global and national-level action on MSK health. Methods: Design: mixed-methods, three-phase design.Phase 1: qualitative study with international key informants (KIs), including patient representatives and people with lived experience. KIs characterised the contemporary landscape for MSK health and priorities for a global strategic response.Phase 2: scoping review of national health policies to identify contemporary MSK policy trends and foci.Phase 3: informed by phases 1-2, was a global eDelphi where multisectoral panellists rated and iterated a framework of priorities and detailed components/actions. Results: Phase 1: 31 KIs representing 25 organisations were sampled from 20 countries (40% low and middle income (LMIC)). Inductively derived themes were used to construct a logic model to underpin latter phases, consisting of five guiding principles, eight strategic priority areas and seven accelerators for action.Phase 2: of the 165 documents identified, 41 (24.8%) from 22 countries (88% high-income countries) and 2 regions met the inclusion criteria. Eight overarching policy themes, supported by 47 subthemes, were derived, aligning closely with the logic model.Phase 3: 674 panellists from 72 countries (46% LMICs) participated in round 1 and 439 (65%) in round 2 of the eDelphi. Fifty-nine components were retained with 10 (17%) identified as essential for health systems. 97.6% and 94.8% agreed or strongly agreed the framework was valuable and credible, respectively, for health systems strengthening. Conclusion: An empirically derived framework, co-designed and strongly supported by multisectoral stakeholders, can now be used as a blueprint for global and country-level responses to improve MSK health and prioritise system strengthening initiatives.