Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIMS Estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for renal function evaluation and the surveillance of kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the GFR estimation by different formulas using creatinine and/or cystatin C, in paediatric kidney transplant recipients and to compare the chronic kidney disease-epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation with age-adjusted creatinine values for height-independent estimated GFR (eGFR) calculation. We also intend to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) influence on eGFR. METHOD Data on paediatric renal transplant patients (n = 35) with stable graft function for more than 6 months post-transplantation were enrolled. eGFR was calculated using the revised Schwartz (bedside Cr), CKD-EPI (Cr), CKiD (CysC), Zappitelli (CysC), combined Schwartz (Cr/CysC) and combined Zappitelli (Cr/CysC) formulas. The estimation by CKD-EPI formula used age and sex-adjusted creatinine values to adult levels with 40 as assigned age (CKD-EPI40). RESULTS A total of 35 patients were included, 26 (76%) were male, with a median age of 16 (4–18) years and a median BMI of 21.27 (15.20–32.29) with a Z-score median of 3.26 (2–5). The median eGFR obtained by the Schwartz [64.39 (23.96–115.16) mL/min/1.73 m2] and by the CKD-EPI40 equation [64.99 (13.98-141.80) mL/min/1.73 m2] was similar (P = .176). When compared with the Schwartz estimation, Cys-based eGFR were significantly lower (by CKiD-CysC, 49.48 (25.47–84.68) (P < .001), by Zappitelli formula 51.31 (24.74–92.61) (P < .001), by combined Schwartz 51.37 (24.07–85.31), (P < .001), by combined Zappitelli 54.83 (20.64–109.68).The correlations between eGFR by all formulas were strong and statistically significant, especially between the combined Schwartz and the combined Zappitelli (r = 0.97). The same pattern of differences between the eGFR estimations was observed when BMI groups (normal versus overweight) were analysed separately, with all formulas being significantly different for Schwartz except for CKD-EPI. CONCLUSION As expected, formulas with creatinine were similar to each other but significantly different when compared with formulas that included cystatin. As demonstrated in previous studies, the combined formulas appear to be the closest estimates of the GFR calculated by exogenous methods. Thus, estimates that consider only creatinine may overestimate the GFR. The eGFR obtained by the adjusted CDK-EPI formula is similar to that obtained by the Schwartz bedside, unlike the other formulas. In this study, we did not find differences regarding the BMI, probably due to the number of this sample.

Clinical Accuracy of Average Creatinine and Cystatin-C-Based Estimated GFR in Japanese Living Renal Transplantation Donors

Prospective Comparison of Equations Based on Creatinine and Cystatin C for the Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Chinese Renal Transplant Recipients.

Relationship of Creatinine and Cystatin C-based Estimated Glomerular Filtration rates with Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate in Healthy Kidney Donors from South Asia

Pre-donation Assessment of Cystatin C to Improve Prediction of Pre- and Post-Donation GFR in Potential Living Kidney Donors

A comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based equations for estimation of graft function

Comparison of Three Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equations with 24-Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance Measurement in Potential Living Kidney Donors

Accuracy of GFR estimation formula in determination of glomerular filtration rate in kidney donors: Comparison with 24 h urine creatinine clearance.

Estimated GFR for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation

The Effect of Donor-Recipient Body Surface Area Ratio on Donor Age and Donor Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Patients Undergoing A Living-Donor Kidney Transplant

Assessment of glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients using serum cystatin C during follow-up

Combining Cystatin C and Creatinine Yields a Reliable Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimation in Older Adults in Contrast to β-Trace Protein and β2-Microglobulin

MO1026: Performance of Creatinine and Cystatin-Based Estimates of GFR in Paediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients. Comparison of the CKD-EPI Age- Adjusted Creatinine eGFR with Previous Formulas

Pretransplant Renal Function Evaluated by Serum Cystatin C Was Associated with Mortality after Liver Transplantation: a Single-Center Experience

Comparison of cystatin C‐based estimated glomerular filtration rate with measured glomerular filtration rate in a pediatric cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease

Cystatin C as an endogenous marker of glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant patients

Prospective Comparison of 24-Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates in Chronic Renal Disease Patients of African Descent

Improved GFR estimation by combined creatinine and cystatin C measurements.

A Comparison of the Renal Function between GFR from Tc-99m DTPA Renography and Serum Creatinine, Serum BUN, eGFR by CKD-EPI Equation, and 24-Hour Urine Creatinine Clearance in Thai Living Related Kidney Donors

Prospective Comparison of Urinary Measured Creatinine Clearance With eGFR and Cystatin C Based Cis-eGFR, Including Kinetic eGFR in the Immediate Post-transplant Period With Prompt Allograft Function

Investigation of methods for more accurate estimation of kidney function in people with high muscle mass

Evaluation of serum creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in a Chinese population.