Abstract:Digital elevation models (DEMs) are the basic data of science and engineering technology research. SRTM and ASTER GDEM are currently widely used global DEMs, and TanDEM-X DEM, released in 2016, has attracted users' attention due to its unprecedented accuracy. These global datasets are often used for local applications and the quality of DEMs affects the results of applications. Many researchers have assessed and compared the quality of global DEMs on a local scale. To provide some additional insights on quality assessment of 12- and 30-m resolution TanDEM-X DEMs, 30-m resolution ASTER GDEM and 30-m resolution SRTM, this study assessed differences' performance in relation to not only geographical features but also the ways in which DEMs have been created on selected Chinese sites, taking ICESat/GLAS points with 14-cm absolute vertical accuracy but size of 70-m diameter and 12-m resolution TanDEM-X DEM with less than 10-m absolute vertical accuracy as the reference data for comprehensive quality evaluation. When comparing the three 30-m DEMs with the reference DEM, an improved Least Z-Difference (LZD) method was applied for co-registration between models, and Quantile-Quantile (Q-Q) plot was used to identify if the DEM errors follow a normal distribution to help choose proper statistical indicators accordingly. The results show that: (1) TanDEM-X DEMs have the best overall quality, followed by SRTM. ASTER GDEM has the worst quality. The 12-m TanDEM-X DEM has significant advantages in describing terrain details. (2) The quality of DEM has a strong relationship with slope, aspect and land cover. However, the relationship between aspect and vertical quality weakens after data co-registration. The quality of DEMs gets higher with the increasing number of images used in the fusion process. The quality in where slopes opposite to the radar beam is the worst for SRTM, which could provide a new perspective for quality assessment of SRTM and other DEMs whose incidence angle files are available. (3) Systematic deviations can reduce the vertical quality of DEM. The differences have non-normal distribution even after co-registration. For researchers who want to know the quality of a DEM in order to use it in further applications, they should pay more attention to the terrain factors and land cover in their study areas and the ways in which the DEM has been created.

Evaluation of the Digital Elevation Model from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) on the Papaloapan Macro-Basin, Mexico, using LiDAR as benchmark

Srtm Dem Correction in Vegetated Mountain Areas Through the Integration of Spaceborne Lidar, Airborne Lidar, and Optical Imagery

ICESat-2 Controlled Integration of GEDI and SRTM Data for Large-Scale Digital Elevation Model Generation

Vertical accuracy assessment of freely available global DEMs (FABDEM, Copernicus DEM, NASADEM, AW3D30 and SRTM) in flood-prone environments

Evaluation of vertical accuracy of open source Digital Elevation Model (DEM)

Accuracy Assessment of High-Resolution Globally Available Open-Source DEMs Using ICESat/GLAS over Mountainous Areas, A Case Study in Yunnan Province, China

Investigation of the use of topographic data derived from Pléiades imagery for high-resolution hillslope-scale morphometry

Spacial Distribution Research of SRTM's Elevation Error in Chaohu Basin

A practical method for SRTM DEM correction over vegetated mountain areas

Novel Approach for Ranking DEMs: Copernicus DEM Improves One Arc Second Open Global Topography

ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America

Quality Assessment Of Three Digital Elevation Models With 30 M Resolution By Taking 12 M Tandem-X Dem As Reference

Performance and precision analysis of 3D surface modeling through UAVs: validation and comparison of different photogrammetric data processing software.

Vertical accuracy of open-source remote sensing data (AW3D30, TanDEM-X, ATLAS) for understory terrain estimation

Reconstruction and Evaluation of DEMs From Bistatic Tandem-X SAR in Mountainous and Coastal Areas of China

Vertical Accuracy Assessment and Improvement of Five High-Resolution Open-Source Digital Elevation Models Using ICESat-2 Data and Random Forest: Case Study on Chongqing, China

Analysing the spatial context of the altimetric error pattern of a digital elevation model using multiscale geographically weighted regression

Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEMs, SRTM and ASTER GDEM on Selected Chinese Sites

Digital Elevation Models for topographic characterisation and flood flow modelling along low-gradient, terminal dryland rivers: A comparison of spaceborne datasets for the Río Colorado, Bolivia

Estimation of Variance and Spatial Correlation Width for Fine-Scale Measurement Error in Digital Elevation Model