Abstract:Background: Long genomic R-loops in eukaryotes were first described at the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus switch regions using bisulfite sequencing and functional studies. A mouse monoclonal antibody called S9.6 has been used for immunoprecipitation (IP) to identify R-loops, based on the assumption that it is specific for RNA:DNA over other nucleic acid duplexes. However, recent work has demonstrated that a variable domain of S9.6 binds AU-rich RNA:RNA duplexes with a KD that is only 5.6-fold weaker than for RNA:DNA duplexes. Most IP protocols do not pre-clear the genomic nucleic acid with RNase A to remove free RNA. Fold back of ssRNA can readily generate RNA:RNA duplexes that may bind the S9.6 antibody, and adventitious binding of RNA may also create short RNA:DNA regions. Here we investigate whether RNase A is needed to obtain reliable IP with S9.6. Findings: As our test locus, we chose the most well-documented site for kilobase-long mammalian genomic R-loops, the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IgH) class switch regions. The R-loops at this locus can be induced by using cytokines to stimulate transcription from germline transcript promoters. We tested IP using S9.6 with and without various RNase treatments. The RNase treatments included RNase H to destroy the RNA in an RNA:DNA duplex and RNase A to destroy single-stranded (ss) RNA to prevent it from binding S9.6 directly (as duplex RNA) and to prevent the ssRNA from annealing to the genome, resulting in adventitious RNA:DNA hybrids. We find that optimal detection of RNA:DNA duplexes requires removal of ssRNA using RNase A. Without RNase A treatment, known regions of R-loop formation containing RNA:DNA duplexes can not be reliably detected. With RNase A treatment, a signal can be detected over background, but only within a limited 2 or 3-fold range, even with a stable kilobase-long genomic R-loop. Conclusion: Any use of the S9.6 antibody must be preceded by RNase A treatment to remove free ssRNA that may compete for the S9.6 binding by forming RNA:RNA regions or short, transient RNA:DNA duplexes. Caution should be used when interpreting S9.6 data, and confirmation by independent structural and functional methods is essential.

Immunoprecipitation of DNA:RNA Hybrids Using the S9.6 Antibody

Detection of R-Loop Structures by Immunofluorescence Using the S9.6 Monoclonal Antibody

Complexities due to single-stranded RNA during antibody detection of genomic rna:dna hybrids

Structural basis of R-loop recognition by the S9.6 monoclonal antibody

R-Loop Immunoprecipitation: A Method to Detect R-Loop Interacting Factors

S9.6 Antibody-Enzyme Conjugates for the Detection of DNA-RNA Hybrids

Cryo-EM Structure of R-loop monoclonal antibody S9.6 in recognizing RNA:DNA hybrids

Immunoprecipitation of RNA:DNA Hybrids from Budding Yeast

High-resolution, strand-specific R-loop mapping via S9.6-based DNA–RNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing

Slot Blot Assay for Detection of R Loops

Quantitative DNA-RNA Immunoprecipitation Sequencing with Spike-Ins

Human proteins that interact with RNA/DNA hybrids

Catalytically inactive, purified RNase H1: A specific and sensitive probe for RNA-DNA hybrid imaging

Simultaneous Visualization of R-Loops/RNA:DNA Hybrids and Replication Forks in a DNA Combing Assay

RNA-DNA hybrid (R-loop) immunoprecipitation mapping: an analytical workflow to evaluate inherent biases

DNA-RNA Hybrid (R-Loop): From a Unified Picture of the Mammalian Telomere to the Genome-Wide Profile

DNA-RNA hybrid (R-loop): from a unified picture of the mammalian telomere to the genome-wide

qDRIP: a method to quantitatively assess RNA–DNA hybrid formation genome-wide

Detect the Hybridization of Single-Stranded DNA by Parallel Scan Spectral Surface Plasmon Resonance Imaging

DNA:RNA Immunoprecipitation from S. pombe Cells for qPCR and Genome-Wide Sequencing