What Can Be Done to Minimize the Effects of the Global Information Ecosystem on the Risk of Nuclear War?

Harold A. Trinkunas,Herbert S. Lin,Benjamin Loehrke
Abstract:On August 11, 2017, President Trump tweeted: “Military solutions are now fully in place, locked and loaded, should North Korea act unwisely. Hopefully Kim Jong Un will fi nd another path!”1 This message followed months of escalating rhetoric and military posturing between the United States and North Korea. The crisis became acute enough that, near the height of tensions in July 2018, polling showed that 60 to 75 percent of Americans were worried about the possibility of war between North Korea and the United States within the following six months.2 Tweets from President Trump often drove or narrated the crisis, adding fears that instantaneous, direct, 280-character threats could lead directly to nuclear war. As former acting undersecretary of defense for policy Brian McKeon testifi ed at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on presidential nuclear authorities, “The statements the president makes through his Twitter account no doubt cause concern and confusion on the other side of the Pacifi c. . . . I’ll be very worried about a miscalculation based on continuing use of his Twitter account with regard to North Korea.”3 As this case illustrates, the new global information ecosystem may be having an important impact on the evolution of international crises. Widespread access to social media on a global scale has accelerated news cycles in traditional media and made it easier to spread mis information and disinformation. Intemperate, ill-considered, and impulsive outbursts have become an important part of crisis dynamics. In the decade since the founding of Facebook and Twitter, social
Political Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?