Abstract WMP11: Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients Without versus With Visible Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis From the AcT Trial
A. Zohaib Siddiqi,Katrina H Ignacio,Fouzi Bala,Ayoola Ademola,Aleksander Tkach,Brian H Buck,Luciana Catanese,Gary Hunter,Dar Dowlatshahi,Atif Zafar,Thalia S Field,Ramana Appireddy,Michel Shamy,Ankur Wadhwa,Tolulope Sajobi,Richard H Swartz,Andrew M Demchuk,Mohammed A Almekhlafi,Bijoy K Menon,Nishita Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/str.55.suppl_1.wmp11
IF: 10.17
2024-02-01
Stroke
Abstract:Background: Around 70% of patients who present with acute ischemic stroke(AIS) have no visible occlusion on baseline imaging. In this post-hoc analysis from the AcT trial, we aimed to assess if there is a difference in safety/efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis in patients presenting with AIS symptoms with no visible occlusion(NVO) versus with visible occlusion(VO). We further sought to determine if this effect differed between tenecteplase and alteplase in the NVO group. Methods: Primary outcome was symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage(SICH) within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included modified Rankin Scale(mRS) 0-1, mRS 0-2, ordinal mRS at 90-120 days, and hemorrhage on imaging as defined by Heidelberg bleeding classification. Mixed effects regression model with quasi Poisson link was used to estimate NVO effect while adjusting for age, sex, NIHSS, thrombolytic type, and onset to needle time. Findings: Of the 1577 patients, 1470(93.2%) patients who received thrombolysis within 4.5h and with available baseline CT angiogram were included in the study. Of these, 479 (30.4%; 247: tenecteplase and 232: alteplase) were in NVO and 991 (69.6%; 509: tenecteplase and 482: alteplase) were in VO group. Patients in NVO group were younger (median 71y vs 75y), with less severe strokes (median NIHSS 6 vs 12). Patients in NVO group had significantly lower rates of death as compared to VO group (8.1% vs 19.1%, adjusted risk ratio(adjRR)1.5, 95%CI:1.0-2.6). There was no difference in rates of SICH (2.3% vs 3.6%, adjRR 0.99, 95%CI:0.5-2.1) or rates of 90-d mRS 0-1 (43.3% vs 31.9%, adjRR 1.0, 95%CI:0.8-1.1). All safety and efficacy outcomes were similar between alteplase and tenecteplase in NVO group. Interpretation: Thrombolysis is just as safe in patients with AIS symptoms with NVO as compared to those with VO on baseline imaging. When thrombolysis is given, there is no difference in outcomes between these group by thrombolytic type.
peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology