Abstract:Purpose Against the background of the enormous economic transition China is undertaking, government intervention over corporate behavior is a frequent and, arguably, necessary measure. Among the most serious problems facing China, economically and reputationally, are environmental issues. So, how is the government intervening in the environmental performance of Chinese enterprises? And how are Chinese enterprises responding? These are the questions to be answered in this study. Design/methodology/approach This paper sampled listed companies on China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges. The data were collected from the HeXun corporate social responsibility report, CSMAR and WIND databases. A Tobit model was used to conduct the main 2SLS regression analysis, and the robustness tests followed the propensity score matching method. Findings The analysis shows that environmental performance is positively related to the government subsidies a company receives. The “Eight-point Regulation of the Centre” crack-down on social corruption introduced in 2012 has weakened rent-seeking overall, but rent-seeking behavior through the cloak of corporate environmental performance has become more serious. As a result, non-polluting and state-owned enterprises are significantly less concerned about their environmental performance, while polluting and private enterprises are more motivated to become good environmental citizens. Practical implications This research provides a greater understanding of the drivers behind environmentally-responsible behavior in Chinese companies. These insights can be used by policymakers and environmental regulators to incentivize a more widespread ground-swell of change across the gamut of Chinese business. Social implications Environmental policy and practice informed by research-driven recommendations can not only make valuable contributions to the health and well-being of Chinese society but also, as a significant contributor to climate change, environmental reforms have global benefits. Originality/value This study explores the motivations behind rent-seeking associated with environmental investment. The findings expand the research horizon of relevant literature on corporate political rent-seeking and deepen the understandings of the economic consequences of corporate investment into environmental practice. The results provide empirical evidence for the Chinese government to implement environmental regulations based on incentives beyond simple profit-making.

Does the institutional environment influence corporate social responsibility? Consideration of green investment of enterprises-evidence from China

Do institutional contingencies matter for green investment?-An institution based view of Chinese listed companies

Institutional Pressures and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence From Chinese Public Enterprises

Can Enterprises in China Achieve Sustainable Development through Green Investment?

Do government policies drive institutional preferences on green investment? Evidence from China

The Impact of Green Institutional Pressure from Local Governments on Corporate Innovation: An Empirical Evidence from Foreign-Invested Enterprises in China

ESG Performance and Green Innovation in New Energy Enterprises: Does Institutional Environment Matter?

Common institutional ownership and corporate green investment: Evidence from China

Green Investor Holdings and Corporate Green Technological Innovation

Institutional Investors' Green Activism and Corporate Green Innovation: Based on the Behind-Scene Communications

Environmental regulation, green credit, and corporate environmental investment

How Environmental Regulation Affects Green Investment of Heavily Polluting Enterprises: Evidence from Steel and Chemical Industries in China

Corporate environmental responsibility in China: a strategic political perspective

Can environmental investors stimulate corporate green technological innovation?—Evidence from China

Strategic or substantive innovation? -The impact of institutional investors' site visits on green innovation evidence from China

The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Green Investment: The Regulatory Role of Internal Control

Do institutional investors’ holdings affect corporate environmental information disclosure? Evidence from China

Do institutional investors facilitate corporate environmental innovation?

Green finance and outward foreign direct investment: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of green insurance in China

Does enhancing environmental regulation promote corporate green investment? Evidence from China

Can the social trust promote corporate green innovation? Evidence from China