[DISTRIBUTION OF S 35-CHLORPROMAZINE IN ENDOCRINE GLANDS (AUTORADIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS)].

G. Cassano,A. Giannini

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Why the UK Complied with COVID-19 Lockdown Law

Simon Halliday,Naomi Finch,Jed Meers,Joe Tomlinson,Mark Wilberforce

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2022.2109233

2022-08-13

King's Law Journal

Abstract:In March 2020, the UK introduced a set of rules to 'lockdown' the country in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These restrictions represented an extraordinary curtailment of normal life for the entire population, prohibiting people from leaving their homes without a reasonable excuse. 1 The lockdown rules constituted a key feature of governmental efforts to manage the early stages of the pandemic crisis. Their central purpose was to change people's routine behaviours in order to contain the rate of infections, thus protecting public health and preserving the NHS's capacity to treat the anticipated influx of patients.
The impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown in the UK for doctoral and early career researchers

Patricia C. Jackman,Rebecca Sanderson,Tandy J. Haughey,Caroline E. Brett,Naomi White,Amy Zile,Katie Tyrrell,Nicola C. Byrom

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00795-4

2021-12-14

Higher Education

Abstract:Abstract Doctoral researchers and early career researchers (ECRs) are crucial to producing scientific advancements and represent the future of academic leadership. Their research endeavours were changed radically by lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived benefits and challenges of the national lockdown in the UK from the perspective of doctoral researchers and ECRs. We present analysis of qualitative survey data from 1,142 doctoral researchers and ECRs on their experiences of the first UK lockdown collected from April 16, 2020–May 14, 2020. Our findings suggest considerable heterogeneity in how the pandemic impacted this key group of academic workers. Challenges arising from the lockdown largely cohered around a poor work environment, limited access to resources, perceptions of pressure, and negative psychological outcomes. Conversely, respondents also highlighted several benefits in the early stages of the pandemic, with the change to working from home creating more time, resulting in greater productivity and a better work-life balance. Collectively, findings indicate the importance of considering the personal circumstances and needs of individual researchers. We discuss the implications for support these researchers require to rebuild their careers in the wake of the initial disruption.

education & educational research
Governmentality Versus Community: The Impact of the COVID Lockdowns

Claire Wallace,Lucia Mytna-Kurekova,Margarita Leon,Jacqueline O’Reilly,Constantin Blome,Margarita Bussi,Becky Faith,Mark Finney,Janine Leschke,Chiara Ruffa,Emma Russell,Mi AhSchøyen,Matthias Thurer,Marge Unt,Rachel Verdin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-023-00189-7

2023-05-09

International Journal of Community Well-Being

Abstract:Abstract The COVID lockdowns were characterised by new forms of governmentality as lives were disrupted and controlled through the vertical transmission of biopolitics by the state. The paper considers how this was experienced by academics in 11 different countries through analysis of diaries written during the first lockdown. The paper asks if communities can offer an alternative to governmentality by looking at three levels: the national, the neighbourhood and the personal. Whilst at a national level the idea of community was instrumentalised to encourage compliance to extraordinary measures, at the local level community compassion through helping neighbours encouraged horizontal connections that could offer a “space” within the dominant logic of governmentality. At the level of personal communities, the digitalisation of social relationships helped to create supportive networks over widely dispersed areas but these were narrowly rather than widely focused, avoiding critical discussion.
(9Z)- and (11Z)-8-methylretinals for artificial visual pigment studies: stereoselective synthesis, structure, and binding models.

R. Álvarez,Marta Domínguez,Y. Pazos,F. Sussman,Á. D. De Lera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/CHEM.200304847

2003-12-05

Chemistry

Abstract:Artificial visual pigment formation was studied by using 8-methyl-substituted retinals in an effort to understand the effect that alkyl substitution of the chromophore side chain has on the visual cycle. The stereoselective synthesis of the 9-cis and 11-cis isomers of 8-methylretinal, as well as the 5-demethylated analogues is also described. The key bond formations consist of a thallium-accelerated Suzuki cross-coupling reaction between cyclohexenylboronic acids and dienyliodides (C6-C7), and a highly stereocontrolled Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons or Wittig condensation (C11-C12). The cyclohexenylboronic acid was prepared by trapping the precursor cyclohexenyllithium species with B(OiPr)(3) or B(OMe)(3). The cyclohexenyllithium species is itself obtained by nBuLi-induced elimination of a trisylhydrazone (Shapiro reaction), or depending upon the steric hindrance of the ring, by iodine-metal exchange. In binding experiments with the apoprotein opsin, only 9-cis-5-demethyl-8-methylretinal yielded an artificial pigment; 9-cis-8-methylretinal simply provided residual binding, while evidence of artificial pigment formation was not found for the 11-cis analogues. Molecular-mechanics-based docking simulations with the crystal structure of rhodopsin have allowed us to rationalize the lack of binding displayed by the 11-cis analogues. Our results indicate that these isomers are highly strained, especially when bound, due to steric clashes with the receptor, and that these interactions are undoubtedly alleviated when 9-cis-5-demethyl-8-methylretinal binds opsin.
"Suffer the little children (to go to school)”: how the same evidence base drove diametrically opposite views of what was best to do for children and their health/education in the 2020-2023 COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden and the UK

David Goldsmith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i11.4652

2023-01-01

Medical Research Archives

Abstract:The Covid-19 pandemic (2020-23) was a global outbreak of a novel coronavirus (nCoV), an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) virus. The pandemic disease is usually described as COVID-19. 1 The first cases of nCoV were first detected in China in December 2019, with the virus spreading rapidly over months to most other countries across the world. This led WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) on 30 January 2020, and to characterise the outbreak as a pandemic on 11 March 2020. 2 In May 2023, more than three years into the pandemic, the WHO Emergency Committee on COVID-19 recommended to the Director-General that given the disease was by now well- established and ongoing, it no longer fitted the definition of a PHEIC. This did not mean that the pandemic itself was declared over, but the global emergency it had caused was. Debate and speculation about the causation pathway for the entry of this nCoV pathogen into humans in 2019, though intense and contested, are not germane to the present discussion. What is germane is the huge death toll, and, just as important, the long-term impacts on society and health it has left in its wake. For a more detailed review see 3 . As a result of the pandemic infections, and also of the many different mitigation strategies employed to “protect” people from the ravages of infection, there were diverse consequences for all affected populations: from deaths, hospitalisations, chronic illness, the economy, employment, education, services, work habits, transport systems across to acute severe strain imposed on healthcare systems faced simultaneously with “business as usual” healthcare demands (often suppressed with later adverse consequences) and by a poorly understood and barely characterised viral infection ‘tsunami’ requiring both “surge” facilities and advanced ITU capabilities which were often unavailable, or inadequate to the tasks at hand. 4 Various mitigations were put in place in different parts of the world, and these typically involved restrictions (sometimes voluntary, sometimes legally enforced) being placed on freedom of movement, behaviour (mask wearing, hand washing), education, employment, social activities and travel 5-8 . Later, specific pharmaceutical interventions 9 and of course vaccination 10 were brought to bear.
Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study

Simon N Williams,Christopher J Armitage,Tova Tampe,Kimberly Dienes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039334

IF: 3.006

2020-07-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objective This study explored UK public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Design This qualitative study comprised five focus groups, carried out online during the early stages of the UK’s stay at home order (‘lockdown’), and analysed using a thematic approach. Setting Focus groups took place via online videoconferencing. Participants Participants (n=27) were all UK residents aged 18 years and older, representing a range of gender, ethnic, age and occupational backgrounds. Results Qualitative analysis revealed four main themes: (1) loss—participants’ loss of (in-person) social interaction, loss of income and loss of structure and routine led to psychological and emotional ‘losses’ such as loss of motivation, loss of meaning and loss of self-worth; (2) criticisms of government communication—participants reported a lack of trust in government and a lack of clarity in the guidelines around social distancing and isolation; (3) adherence—participants reported high self-adherence to social distancing guidelines but reported seeing or hearing of non-adherence in others; (4) uncertainty around social reintegration and the future—some participants felt they would have lingering concerns over social contact while others were eager to return to high levels of social activity. Most participants, and particularly those in low-paid or precarious employment, reported feeling that the social distancing and isolation associated with COVID-19 policy has had negative impacts on their mental health and well-being during the early stages of the UK’s ‘lockdown’. Conclusions A rapid response is necessary in terms of public health programming to mitigate the mental health impacts of COVID-19 social distancing and isolation. Social distancing and isolation ‘exit strategies’ must account for the fact that, although some individuals will voluntarily or habitually continue to socially distance, others will seek high levels of social engagement as soon as possible.

medicine, general & internal
The UK lockdown and the economic value of human life

Julian Jessop

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.12417

2020-06-01

Economic Affairs

Abstract:<header class="article-table-caption"><span class="table-caption__label">TABLE 1. </span>Two cost–benefit analyses of the UK lockdown </header><table class="table article-section__table"><thead><tr><th class="bottom-bordered-cell left-aligned">Scenario A ('then')</th><th class="bottom-bordered-cell left-aligned">Scenario B ('now')</th></tr><tr><th class="bottom-bordered-cell right-bordered-cell left-aligned">Benefits</th><th class="bottom-bordered-cell left-aligned">Costs</th><th class="bottom-bordered-cell left-aligned">Benefits</th><th class="bottom-bordered-cell left-aligned">Costs</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td class="right-bordered-cell left-aligned">400,000 lives saved: £240bn</td><td class="left-aligned">Additional fall in GDP: £110bn</td><td class="left-aligned">400,000 lives saved: £240bn</td><td class="left-aligned">200,000 lives lost and other social harms: £120bn</td></tr><tr><td class="left-aligned">Larger economic hit: £250bn</td></tr><tr><td class="left-aligned">Net gain £130bn</td><td class="left-aligned">Net loss £130bn</td></tr></tbody></table>
The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia

Daniel Griffiths,Luke Sheehan,Dennis Petrie,Caryn van Vreden,Peter Whiteford,Alex Collie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266650

IF: 3.7

2022-04-07

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Objectives To determine health impacts during, and following, an extended community lockdown and COVID-19 outbreak in the Australian state of Victoria, compared with the rest of Australia. Methods A national cohort of 898 working-age Australians enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study, completing surveys before, during, and after a 112-day community lockdown in Victoria (8 July– 27 October 2020). Outcomes included psychological distress, mental and physical health, work, social interactions and finances. Regression models examined health changes during and following lockdown. Results The Victorian lockdown led to increased psychological distress. Health impacts coincided with greater social isolation and work loss. Following the extended lockdown, mental health, work and social interactions recovered to an extent whereby no significant long-lasting effects were identified in Victoria compared to the rest of Australia. Conclusion The Victorian community lockdown had adverse health consequences, which reversed upon release from lockdown. Governments should weigh all potential health impacts of lockdown. Services and programs to reduce the negative impacts of lockdown may include increases in mental health care, encouraging safe social interactions and supports to maintain employment relationships.

multidisciplinary sciences
Adapting to lockdown

Dr Simon Hudson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23912/9781911635703-4432

2020-08-01

Abstract:By mid-April 2020, a third of the global population was under full or partial lockdown. While ‘lockdown’ was not a technical term used by public-health officials, it referred to anything from mandatory geographic quarantines to non- mandatory recommendations to stay at home, closures of certain types of businesses, or bans on events and gatherings. During this lockdown period, the travel sector worldwide continued to experience a loss of business. For example, Spain’s famous annual San Fermin bull-running festival, which usually draws thousands of participants, was canceled because of the coronavirus crisis. “As expected as it was, it still leaves us deeply sad,” said acting mayor Ana Elizalde in a statement from the local Pamplona town hall. The July festival, which was made famous in Ernest Hemingway’s novel The Sun Also Rises, has seldom been canceled in its history. Other major European tourist events were canceled, including Oktoberfest, the famous annual German beer-drinking festival which traditionally sees six million people travel to Munich.
Comparison of different exit scenarios from the lock-down for COVID-19 epidemic in the UK and assessing uncertainty of the predictions

Anatoly Zhigljavsky,Roger Whitaker,Ivan Fesenko,Kobi Kremnizer,Jack Noonan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.09.20059451

2020-04-14

Abstract:Abstract We model further development of the COVID-19 epidemic in the UK given the current data and assuming different scenarios of handling the epidemic. In this research, we further extend the stochastic model suggested in [1] and incorporate in it all available to us knowledge about parameters characterising the behaviour of the virus and the illness induced by it. The models we use are flexible, comprehensive, fast to run and allow us to incorporate the following: time-dependent strategies of handling the epidemic; spatial heterogeneity of the population and heterogeneity of development of epidemic in different areas; special characteristics of particular groups of people, especially people with specific medical pre-histories and elderly. Standard epidemiological models such as SIR and many of its modifications are not flexible enough and hence are not precise enough in the studies that requires the use of the features above. Decision-makers get serious benefits from using better and more flexible models as they can avoid of nuanced lock-downs, better plan the exit strategy based on local population data, different stages of the epidemic in different areas, making specific recommendations to specific groups of people; all this resulting in a lesser impact on economy, improved forecasts of regional demand upon NHS allowing for intelligent resource allocation. In this work, we investigate the sensitivity of the model to all its parameters while considering several realistic scenarios of what is likely to happen with the dynamics of the epidemic after the lock-down, which has started on March 23, is lifted. The main findings from this research are the following very little gain, in terms of the projected hospital bed occupancy and expected numbers of death, of continuing the lock-down beyond April 13, provided the isolation of older and vulnerable people continues and the public carries on some level of isolation in the next 2-3 months, see Section 3.1; in agreement with [1], isolation of the group of vulnerable people during the next 2-3 months should be one of the main priorities, see Section 3.2; it is of high importance that the whole population carries on some level of isolation in the next 2-3 months, see Section 3.5; the timing of the current lock-down seems to be very sensible in areas like London where the epidemic has started to pick up by March 23; in such areas the second wave of epidemic is not expected, see figures in Sections 2.2 and 3; the epidemic should almost completely finish in July, no global second wave should be expected, except areas where the first wave is almost absent, see Section 3.4.
COUNTERPOINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? Yes.

R. Truog,R. Tasker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.032

IF: 9.6

2017-10-01

Chest

Abstract:
Counting the Costs of COVID-19: Why Future Treatment Option Values Matter

Adrian Kent

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v7i6.5034

2020-09-30

Applied Economics and Finance

Abstract:I critique a recent analysis (Miles, Stedman & Heald, 2020) of COVID-19 lockdown costs and benefits, focussing on the United Kingdom (UK). Miles et al. (2020) argue that the March-June UK lockdown was more costly than the benefit of lives saved, evaluated using the NICE threshold of £30000 for a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and that the costs of a lockdown for 13 weeks from mid-June would be vastly greater than any plausible estimate of the benefits, even if easing produced a second infection wave causing over 7000 deaths weekly by mid-September. I note here two key problems that significantly affect their estimates and cast doubt on their conclusions. Firstly, their calculations arbitrarily cut off after 13 weeks, without costing the epidemic end state. That is, they assume indifference between mid-September states of 13 or 7500 weekly deaths and corresponding infection rates. This seems indefensible unless one assumes that (a) there is little chance of any effective vaccine or improved medical or social interventions for the foreseeable future, (b) notwithstanding temporary lockdowns, COVID-19 will very likely propagate until herd immunity. Even under these assumptions it is very questionable. Secondly, they ignore the costs of serious illness, possible long-term lowering of life quality and expectancy for survivors. These are uncertain, but plausibly at least as large as the costs in deaths.In summary, policy on tackling COVID-19 cannot be rationally made without estimating probabilities of future medical interventions and long-term illness costs. More work on modelling these uncertainties is urgently needed.

English Else
Costa, cancer and coronavirus: contractualism as a guide to the ethics of lockdown

Stephen David John,Emma J Curran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107103

2021-03-19

Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract:Lockdown measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic involve placing huge burdens on some members of society for the sake of benefiting other members of society. How should we decide when these policies are permissible? Many writers propose we should address this question using cost-benefit analysis (CBA), a broadly consequentialist approach. We argue for an alternative non-consequentialist approach, grounded in contractualist moral theorising. The first section sets up key issues in the ethics of lockdown, and sketches the apparent appeal of addressing these problems in a CBA frame. The second section argues that CBA fundamentally distorts the normative landscape in two ways: first, in principle, it allows very many morally trivial preferences—say, for a coffee—might outweigh morally weighty life-and-death concerns; second, it is insensitive to the core moral distinction between victims and vectors of disease. The third section sketches our non-consequentialist alternative, grounded in Thomas Scanlon’s contractualist moral theory. On this account, the ethics of self-defence implies a strong default presumption in favour of a highly restrictive, universal lockdown policy: we then ask whether there are alternatives to such a policy which are justifiable to all affected parties, paying particular attention to the complaints of those most burdened by policy. In the fourth section, we defend our contractualist approach against the charge that it is impractical or counterintuitive, noting that actual CBAs face similar, or worse, challenges.

ethics,medical ethics,social issues,social sciences, biomedical
Go local: The key to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic in the post lockdown era

Isabel Bennett,Jobie Budd,Erin M. Manning,Ed Manley,Mengdie Zhuang,Ingemar J. Cox,Michael Short,Anne M. Johnson,Deenan Pillay,Rachel A. McKendry

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.02603

2020-07-06

Abstract:The UK government announced its first wave of lockdown easing on 10 May 2020, two months after the non-pharmaceutical measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19 were first introduced on 23 March 2020. Analysis of reported case rate data from Public Health England and aggregated and anonymised crowd level mobility data shows variability across local authorities in the UK. A locality-based approach to lockdown easing is needed, enabling local public health and associated health and social care services to rapidly respond to emerging hotspots of infection. National level data will hide an increasing heterogeneity of COVID-19 infections and mobility, and new ways of real-time data presentation to the public are required. Data sources (including mobile) allow for faster visualisation than more traditional data sources, and are part of a wider trend towards near real-time analysis of outbreaks needed for timely, targeted local public health interventions. Real time data visualisation may give early warnings of unusual levels of activity which warrant further investigation by local public health authorities.

Computers and Society
The impact of local and national restrictions in response to COVID-19 on social contacts in England: a longitudinal natural experiment

Christopher I. Jarvis,Amy Gimma,Kevin van Zandvoort,Kerry L. M. Wong,W. John Edmunds,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01924-7

IF: 9.3

2021-02-19

BMC Medicine

Abstract:Abstract Background England’s COVID-19 response transitioned from a national lockdown to localised interventions. In response to rising cases, these were supplemented by national restrictions on contacts (the Rule of Six), then 10 pm closing for bars and restaurants, and encouragement to work from home. These were quickly followed by a 3-tier system applying different restrictions in different localities. As cases continued to rise, a second national lockdown was declared. We used a national survey to quantify the impact of these restrictions on epidemiologically relevant contacts. Methods We compared paired measures on setting-specific contacts before and after each restriction started and tested for differences using paired permutation tests on the mean change in contacts and the proportion of individuals decreasing their contacts. Results Following the imposition of each measure, individuals tended to report fewer contacts than they had before. However, the magnitude of the changes was relatively small and variable. For instance, although early closure of bars and restaurants appeared to have no measurable effect on contacts, the work from home directive reduced mean daily work contacts by 0.99 (95% confidence interval CI] 0.03–1.94), and the Rule of Six reduced non-work and school contacts by a mean of 0.25 (0.01–0.5) per day. Whilst Tier 3 appeared to also reduce non-work and school contacts, the evidence for an effect of the lesser restrictions (Tiers 1 and 2) was much weaker. There may also have been some evidence of saturation of effects, with those who were in Tier 1 (least restrictive) reducing their contacts markedly when they entered lockdown, which was not reflected in similar changes in those who were already under tighter restrictions (Tiers 2 and 3). Conclusions The imposition of various local and national measures in England during the summer and autumn of 2020 has gradually reduced contacts. However, these changes are smaller than the initial lockdown in March. This may partly be because many individuals were already starting from a lower number of contacts.

medicine, general & internal
A prescription for improvement: A short survey to identify reasons behind public sector pharmacists' migration.

G. K. Ali,Mohamed Abdelrahman,A. Omer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12927/WHP.2013.18149

2006-07-15

World Health & Population

Abstract:In Sudan, there is a mismatch between the numbers of pharmacists and where they worked, and the demand for pharmacy services. The public sector, where the majority of the population is served, suffered heavily from the pharmacists' migration to the private sector. In order to stem the "brain drain" of pharmacists, it is, however, necessary to have accurate and evidence-based information regarding the reasons that make the pharmacists emigrate to the private sector.
Learning from lockdown - Assessing the positive and negative experiences, and coping strategies of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Kappel Sarah,Schmitt Oceane,Finnegan Emily,Fureix Carole

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105269

Abstract:With the disruption of nonessential research due to the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers faced unexpected changes in their work and personal life. We assessed what challenges researchers encountered during lockdown and whether gender, career level, discipline, and job-permanency influenced their experiences (negative and positive), thereby collecting empirical material which could provide valuable information for future mentoring/supporting practices. Data were collected between July-August 2020 via an online-survey, and answers from 210 respondents (78% female, 21% male, 1% non-disclosed gender) working in Animal Behaviour and Welfare (ABW, 57%), other biological sciences (37%) or social sciences (6%) were analysed. Respondents were post-graduate students (35%), research associates (35%), and professors (22%) or classified as 'other' (8%), and overall fixed-term (55%) and permanent (45%) jobholders. We expected that early career researchers, non-permanent jobholders, and female respondents would report more challenges/less positive experiences during lockdown. Due to the widespread impact of the pandemic, we predicted no effect of academic disciplines. We found great inter-individual difference in the experiences reported by the respondents, with some reporting adaptation to a new routine within a week (31% of the respondents) and/or greater efficiency working from home (19%) while others felt less efficient working from home and/or experienced a greater imbalance towards work (30%) and/or increased personal responsibilities (24%). The most commonly reported challenges were the lack of informal contact with colleagues (63%), a loss of focus due to worry or stress (53%) and/or unsuitable working environments (47%). Postgraduate students, research associates, non-permanent jobholders and ABW researchers reported more work-related challenges (p = from 0.03 to <0.0001) and were more likely to worry about the future (p = from 0.0002 to <0.0001) than other career levels, permanent jobholders, and researchers from other disciplines respectively. We found no gender effect (p = from 0.006 [NS due to Benjamini-Liu correction for multiple comparisons, 24 metrics tested] to 1.000), except that female respondents reported more personal changes affecting their ability to work than male respondents (p = 0.037). On a positive note, most respondents (83%) perceived positive changes during lockdown and 60% reported one or more coping strategies during lockdown, with exercising/outdoor activities and interacting with family/friends most commonly reported. Based on our findings, we provide recommendations for overcoming the reported Covid-19-related challenges which could further deliver valuable guidance for supporting/mentoring schemes and activities fostering a more resilient research community.
Iteration 2-Theories: Extended Abstract

S. Bloom,Anna Labella,Z. Ésik,E. Manes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0000461

1997-12-13

Abstract:
Life Changes during the First COVID-19 Lockdown and Mental Well-Being at Different Stages of the Life Course: Evidence from Five British Cohorts

Maria Evandrou,Jane Falkingham,Min Qin,Athina Vlachantoni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i12.4843

2023-01-01

Medical Research Archives

Abstract:Objectives: The COVID-19 crisis significantly reshaped individuals’ daily lives and work, potentially also affecting their mental health. This study examines changes in psychological stress, anxiety, and depression during the first lockdown amongst five British cohorts at different stages of the life course: older adolescence, early adulthood, mid-career, and later life. It investigates the correlation between self-reported stress and life changes across a range of domains including health; education and the move to home schooling; working patterns and furlough; and living arrangements and family life. Methods: The study analyses data from 14,130 cohort members participating in the special COVID-19 surveys conducted in May 2020. These surveys are part of the ongoing 1946, 1958, 1970, and 2000-01 British birth cohorts, as well as the Next Steps cohort (born in 1989-90). Probit regression models assess the likelihood of increased stress among individuals reporting pandemic-related life changes compared to those who did not, across a range of different life domains. The study also examines the association between heightened stress and subsequent anxiety and depression. Results: The research highlights the diverse challenges faced by individuals at different life stages during the early phase of the pandemic. Young people faced disrupted education, with many returning to the parental home; parents had to cope with the closure of schools and childcare services, dealing with young children at home; mid-career professionals also found themselves balancing work and family responsibilities; retirees faced cancelled medical appointments and disrupted home care services. All these challenges were associated with significantly increased reported stress among affected individuals; particularly in adolescence and young adulthood, where mental health outcomes were poorer than in older cohorts. Moreover, heightened stress substantially raised the risk of developing anxiety and depression. Conclusions: The study affirms that individuals in various life stages faced exceptional challenges during the initial lockdown, adversely affecting mental well-being. Adolescents and young adults, experiencing more life changes but lacking coping resources, felt the disruption especially heavily. Going forward, given the potential health consequences of prolonged stress, anxiety, and depression, policymakers must consider these temporary challenges through a life course lens when designing appropriate interventions and support services.
Predictions of COVID-19 dynamics in the UK: Short-term forecasting and analysis of potential exit strategies

Matt J. Keeling,Edward M. Hill,Erin E. Gorsich,Bridget Penman,Glen Guyver-Fletcher,Alex Holmes,Trystan Leng,Hector McKimm,Massimiliano Tamborrino,Louise Dyson,Michael J. Tildesley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008619

2021-01-22

PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract:Efforts to suppress transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the UK have seen non-pharmaceutical interventions being invoked. The most severe measures to date include all restaurants, pubs and cafes being ordered to close on 20th March, followed by a “stay at home” order on the 23rd March and the closure of all non-essential retail outlets for an indefinite period. Government agencies are presently analysing how best to develop an exit strategy from these measures and to determine how the epidemic may progress once measures are lifted. Mathematical models are currently providing short and long term forecasts regarding the future course of the COVID-19 outbreak in the UK to support evidence-based policymaking. We present a deterministic, age-structured transmission model that uses real-time data on confirmed cases requiring hospital care and mortality to provide up-to-date predictions on epidemic spread in ten regions of the UK. The model captures a range of age-dependent heterogeneities, reduced transmission from asymptomatic infections and produces a good fit to the key epidemic features over time. We simulated a suite of scenarios to assess the impact of differing approaches to relaxing social distancing measures from 7th May 2020 on the estimated number of patients requiring inpatient and critical care treatment, and deaths. With regard to future epidemic outcomes, we investigated the impact of reducing compliance, ongoing shielding of elder age groups, reapplying stringent social distancing measures using region based triggers and the role of asymptomatic transmission. We find that significant relaxation of social distancing measures from 7th May onwards can lead to a rapid resurgence of COVID-19 disease and the health system being quickly overwhelmed by a sizeable, second epidemic wave. In all considered age-shielding based strategies, we projected serious demand on critical care resources during the course of the pandemic. The reintroduction and release of strict measures on a regional basis, based on ICU bed occupancy, results in a long epidemic tail, until the second half of 2021, but ensures that the health service is protected by reintroducing social distancing measures for all individuals in a region when required. Our work confirms the effectiveness of stringent non-pharmaceutical measures in March 2020 to suppress the epidemic. It also provides strong evidence to support the need for a cautious, measured approach to relaxation of lockdown measures, to protect the most vulnerable members of society and support the health service through subduing demand on hospital beds, in particular bed occupancy in intensive care units.

biochemical research methods,mathematical & computational biology

[DISTRIBUTION OF S 35-CHLORPROMAZINE IN ENDOCRINE GLANDS (AUTORADIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS)].

Why the UK Complied with COVID-19 Lockdown Law

The impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown in the UK for doctoral and early career researchers

Governmentality Versus Community: The Impact of the COVID Lockdowns

(9Z)- and (11Z)-8-methylretinals for artificial visual pigment studies: stereoselective synthesis, structure, and binding models.

"Suffer the little children (to go to school)”: how the same evidence base drove diametrically opposite views of what was best to do for children and their health/education in the 2020-2023 COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden and the UK

Public perceptions and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a UK-based focus group study

The UK lockdown and the economic value of human life

The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia

Adapting to lockdown

Comparison of different exit scenarios from the lock-down for COVID-19 epidemic in the UK and assessing uncertainty of the predictions

COUNTERPOINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? Yes.

Counting the Costs of COVID-19: Why Future Treatment Option Values Matter

Costa, cancer and coronavirus: contractualism as a guide to the ethics of lockdown

Go local: The key to controlling the COVID-19 pandemic in the post lockdown era

The impact of local and national restrictions in response to COVID-19 on social contacts in England: a longitudinal natural experiment

A prescription for improvement: A short survey to identify reasons behind public sector pharmacists' migration.

Learning from lockdown - Assessing the positive and negative experiences, and coping strategies of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Iteration 2-Theories: Extended Abstract

Life Changes during the First COVID-19 Lockdown and Mental Well-Being at Different Stages of the Life Course: Evidence from Five British Cohorts

Predictions of COVID-19 dynamics in the UK: Short-term forecasting and analysis of potential exit strategies