Patterns of Heart Failure Dyadic Illness Management: The Important Role of Gender

Christopher S Lee,Kristen A Sethares,Jessica Harman Thompson,Kenneth M Faulkner,Emily Aarons,Karen S Lyons

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000695

Abstract:Background: The ways in which patients with heart failure (HF) and their care partners work together to manage HF are often overlooked. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and compare different patterns of HF dyadic illness management. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data on HF dyads. Heart failure management was measured using patient and care partner versions of the Self-Care of HF Index and European HF Self-care Behavior Scale. Latent class modeling was used to identify patterns of HF dyadic management. Results: The mean age of the 62 patients and their care partners was 59.7 ± 11.8 and 58.1 ± 11.9 years, respectively. A majority of patients (71.0%) had class III/IV HF, and a majority of the couples (95.2%) were married. Two distinct dyadic patterns were observed, 1 collaborative management type (n = 42, 67.7%) and 1 autonomous management type (n = 20, 32.3%). Dyads in the autonomous pattern were mostly female patients with male care partners; patients in this pattern also were more anxious and depressed, and reported worse relationship quality compared with collaborative dyads. Conclusion: There is an engendered spectrum of collaboration in how HF patient-care partner dyads work together to manage HF that needs to be considered in clinical care and research.