Association between gastrin-releasing peptide receptor expression as assessed with [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/CT and histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer

Kerstin Michalski,Christian Stoykow,Peter Bronsert,Ingolf Juhasz-Böss,Philipp T Meyer,Juri Ruf,Thalia Erbes,Jasmin Asberger
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.05.003
Abstract:Introduction: The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor is overexpressed in breast cancer (BC) tissue and can be visualized by positron emission tomography (PET) using the GRPR antagonist [68Ga]Ga-RM2. This study assessed tumor binding of RM2 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in primary BC with reference to residual tumor size in the resected specimen. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, five female patients with biopsy-confirmed estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary BC (one with bilateral tumors) underwent [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/CT before and after NAC. PET/CT was acquired 1 h after injection of 143-224 MBq [68Ga]Ga-RM2. Time from pre-NAC PET to beginning of NAC was 23 ± 4.9 days, from end of NAC to post-NAC PET 18.7 ± 6.3 days, and from post-NAC PET to surgery 9.5 ± 10.8 days. In vivo tumor uptake of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 was assessed before and after NAC and correlated with histopathological response. Results: All tumors (6/6) showed strongly increased [68Ga]Ga-RM2 uptake compared to normal breast tissue on pre-NAC PET (mean SUVmax 13.2 ± 7.3; mean SUVpeak 9.4 ± 4.4). [68Ga]Ga-RM2 uptake was significantly reduced on post-NAC PET in all primary tumors (mean SUVmax 2.3 ± 0.8, -79 ± 11%; p = 0.0125; mean SUVpeak 1.6 ± 0.4, -79 ± 10%; p = 0.0096). Residual tumor size in resected specimens correlated well with SUVmax (r = 0.91, p = 0.0057) and SUVpeak (r = 0.88, p = 0.0196) on [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/CT after NAC. Conclusion and implications for patient care: In this pilot study, residual uptake of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 in ER-positive primary BC correlated well with residual vital tumor size after NAC. This suggests that [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/CT merits further investigation for response assessment to NAC in patients with ER-positive BC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?