Operational Analysis of Stochastic Closed Queueing Networks

Y. Dallery,Xi-Ren Cao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-5316(92)90019-D

1992-01-02

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The fire risk of portable batteries in their end-of-life: Investigation of the state of charge of waste lithium-ion batteries in Austria

Thomas Nigl,Tanja Bäck,Stefan Stuhlpfarrer,Roland Pomberger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X211010640

2021-04-12

Abstract:The increased utilisation of lithium-ion batteries in the last years does not come without cost. Due to thermal runaway and exothermic degradation reactions, portable batteries pose enormous risks to waste management systems and infrastructure in their end-of-life phase. All over Europe, the number of waste fires caused by lithium-ion batteries are rising. The risk of a battery fire is mainly influenced by the probability and severity of a thermal runaway or exothermic degradation, which depends on the current state of charge (SOC) of the respective battery. In order to determine the distribution of the SOC which is one of the main influence factors to waste fires caused by lithium-ion batteries, 980 waste battery cells were representatively sampled, manually dismantled and analysed using a prototypic laboratory test stand. Approximately 24% of the analysed cells and batteries had a residual SOC of at least 25%, and approximately 12% had a residual SOC of at least 50%. Hence, approximately every fourth to eighth portable battery threatens to cause a waste fire when critically damaged. Furthermore, a distinct relationship between the actual cell voltage and the residual SOC was found for end-of-life portable batteries.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
The Recycling of End-of-Life Lithium-Ion Batteries and the Phase Characterisation of Black Mass

Laurance Donnelly,Duncan Pirrie,Matthew Power,Ian Corfe,Jukka Kuva,Sari Lukkari,Yann Lahaye,Xuan Liu,Quentin Dehaine,Ester M. Jolis,Alan Butcher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling8040059

2023-07-12

Recycling

Abstract:Black mass is the industry term applied to end-of-life (EoL) lithium-ion batteries that have been mechanically processed for potential use as a recycled material to recover the valuable metals present, including cobalt, lithium, manganese, nickel and copper. A significant challenge to the effective processing of black mass is the complexity of the feed material. Two samples of black mass from a European source were analysed using a combination of methods including automated SEM-EDS (AMICS) to characterise and quantify the phases present and particle chemistry. Micro X-CT imaging, overlain onto automated mineralogy images, enabled the 3D morphology of the particles to be determined. Micro-XRF was used to map the copper, nickel, manganese and cobalt-bearing phases. Since Li cannot be detected using SEM-EDS, its abundance was semi-quantified using laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). The integration of these complimentary analytical methods allowed for detailed phase characterisation, which may guide the potential hydrometallurgical or pyrometallurgical recycling routes and chemical assaying.
Recycling Strategies for Spent Consumer Lithium-Ion Batteries

Moritz Petzold,Sabine Flamme

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met14020151

IF: 2.695

2024-01-26

Metals

Abstract:Introduction: In the quest for sustainable energy solutions and environmental protection, the management of end-of-life (EoL) batteries has emerged as a critical issue. Batteries, especially lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), power a wide range of devices and are central to modern life. As society's reliance on batteries grows, there is an urgent need for sustainable battery recycling methods that can efficiently recover valuable materials, minimize environmental impact, and support the circular economy. Methods: A literature review was conducted to analyze the LIB market, the estimated return volumes and state-of-the-art sorting and recycling processes. Furthermore, a manual dismantling and input analysis was done for consumer LIB. Results: The current recycling processes operate for individual cathode active material input only. However, there is no sorting process or application in place to provide pre-sorted LIBs. This is why they need to be developed. X-ray transmission, X-ray fluorescence and optical sorting in theory can be applied to differentiate LIBs by their cathode active material. To support this hypothesis, further investigations need to be performed.

materials science, multidisciplinary,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
Economic and environmental characterization of an evolving Li-ion battery waste stream

Xue Wang,Gabrielle Gaustad,Callie W Babbitt,Chelsea Bailey,Matthew J Ganter,Brian J Landi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.021

2014-03-15

Abstract:While disposal bans of lithium-ion batteries are gaining in popularity, the infrastructure required to recycle these batteries has not yet fully emerged and the economic motivation for this type of recycling system has not yet been quantified comprehensively. This study combines economic modeling and fundamental material characterization methods to quantify economic trade-offs for lithium ion batteries at their end-of-life. Results show that as chemistries transition from lithium-cobalt based cathodes to less costly chemistries, battery recovery value decreases along with the initial value of the raw materials used. For example, manganese-spinel and iron phosphate cathode batteries have potential material values 73% and 79% less than cobalt cathode batteries, respectively. A majority of the potentially recoverable value resides in the base metals contained in the cathode; this increases disassembly cost and time as this is the last portion of the battery taken apart. A great deal of compositional variability exists, even within the same cathode chemistry, due to differences between manufacturers with coefficient of variation up to 37% for some base metals. Cathode changes over time will result in a heavily co-mingled waste stream, further complicating waste management and recycling processes. These results aim to inform disposal, collection, and take-back policies being proposed currently that affect waste management infrastructure as well as guide future deployment of novel recycling techniques.
Material Flow Analysis of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling in Europe: Environmental and Economic Implications

Martina Bruno,Silvia Fiore

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9040231

2023-04-18

Batteries

Abstract:This study aimed at a quantitative analysis of the material flows associated with End of Life (EoL) lithium-ion batteries’ (LIBs) materials in Europe. The European electric vehicles fleet in 2020 was taken as a case study, assuming a 10-year lifetime for the batteries and that the related EoL LIBs would be processed by existing recycling plants via pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, or their combination in sequence. The economic implications (recycling operative costs compared to the revenues from the sales of the recycled metals) and the environmental performances (CO2 eq. emitted, energy demand and circularity performances) were assessed. Based on the gathered results, the existing European recycling capacity will overlook over 78% of the forecasted EoL LIBs. The treatment efficiencies of the full-scale recycling processes allow for the recovery of over 90% of copper, cobalt, nickel, and manganese, 87% of aluminum, and only 42% of lithium and 35% of iron entering the recycling facilities. In overall, LIBs recycling in 2030 will involve the emission of 3.7 Mt of CO2 eq. and an energy demand of 33.6 GWh. Hydrometallurgy presents the best economic and environmental trade-off compared to other recycling strategies. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that current European LIBs’ recycling infrastructure will be inadequate in the near future and the direction (i.e., hydrometallurgy) that its strengthening should pursue.
Ecological Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles with Focus on Mechanical Processes

Jan Diekmann,Christian Hanisch,Linus Froböse,Gerrit Schälicke,Thomas Loellhoeffel,Anne-Sophie Fölster,Arno Kwade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0271701jes

IF: 3.9

2016-12-07

Journal of The Electrochemical Society

Abstract:The increasing usage of electrical drive systems and stationary energy storage worldwide lead to a high demand of raw materials for the production of lithium-ion batteries. To prevent further shortage of these crucial materials, ecological and efficient recycling processes of lithium-ion batteries are needed. Nowadays industrial processes are mostly pyrometallurgical and as such energy and cost intensive. The LithoRec projects, funded by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB), aimed at a realization of a new energy-efficient recycling process, abstaining high temperatures and tracing mechanical process-steps. The conducted mechanical processes were thoroughly investigated by experiments in a laboratory and within technical scale, describing gas release of aged and non-aged lithium-ion batteries during dry crushing, intermediates, and products of the mechanical separation. Conclusively, we found that applying a second crushing step increases the yield of the coating materials, but also enables more selective separation. This work identifies the need for recycling of lithium-ion batteries and its challenges and hazard potential in regards to the applied materials. The outlined results show a safe and ecological recycling process with a material recycling rate of at least 75%.

electrochemistry,materials science, coatings & films
Biodegradable plastics – Where to throw? A life cycle assessment of waste collection and management pathways in Austria

Namrata Mhaddolkar,Concetta Lodato,Alexia Tischberger-Aldrian,Daniel Vollprecht,Thomas Fruergaard Astrup

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.10.018

IF: 8.816

2024-10-31

Waste Management

Abstract:The current waste management systems are struggling to optimally handle biodegradable plastics (BDPs) and are facing numerous challenges; one of which is the consumer confusion about how to best source-segregate BDPs. Based on an environmental life-cycle assessment, this study investigated the consequences of collecting BDPs in one of three waste streams (packaging waste, biowaste, and residual waste) in Austria. Collecting BDPs as (i) packaging waste resulted in incineration (SP1) or mechanical recycling (SP2), (ii) biowaste resulted in composting (SB1) or anaerobic digestion (AD) (SB2), and (iii) residual waste in incineration (SR1). SP2 performed best in most of the 16 investigated impact categories (ICs). Three scenario analyses demonstrated that (i) utilisation of BDPs as an alternative fuel for process heat substitution yielded more environmental benefits than incineration in SP1 and SP2, (ii) adding a material recovery facility (MRF) with AD increased the environmental load for SB2, while (iii) the energy scenario with zero electricity imports plus heat from biomass performed best for most alternative pathways across the 16 ICs. Eight technology parameters (out of 97) were identified as most relevant for the results based on data quality, sensitivity ratio, and analytical uncertainty; they were related to waste incineration, MRF, recycling facility, compost- and AD processes. Overall, mechanical recycling emerged as the most favourable option which is aligned with the waste-hierarchy mentioned in the European Union Waste Framework Directive. However, effective mechanical recycling of BDPs requires (i) a 'sufficient' waste amount, (ii) a market for recyclates, and (iii) relevant mechanical recycling infrastructure.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental
Challenges in Ecofriendly Battery Recycling and Closed Material Cycles: A Perspective on Future Lithium Battery Generations

Stefan Doose,Julian K. Mayer,Peter Michalowski,Arno Kwade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met11020291

IF: 2.695

2021-02-08

Metals

Abstract:The global use of lithium-ion batteries of all types has been increasing at a rapid pace for many years. In order to achieve the goal of an economical and sustainable battery industry, the recycling and recirculation of materials is a central element on this path. As the achievement of high 95% recovery rates demanded by the European Union for some metals from today’s lithium ion batteries is already very challenging, the question arises of how the process chains and safety of battery recycling as well as the achievement of closed material cycles are affected by the new lithium battery generations, which are supposed to enter the market in the next 5 to 10 years. Based on a survey of the potential development of battery technology in the next years, where a diversification between high-performance and cost-efficient batteries is expected, and today’s knowledge on recycling, the challenges and chances of the new battery generations regarding the development of recycling processes, hazards in battery dismantling and recycling, as well as establishing a circular economy are discussed. It becomes clear that the diversification and new developments demand a proper separation of battery types before recycling, for example by a transnational network of dismantling and sorting locations, and flexible and high sophisticated recycling processes with case-wise higher safety standards than today. Moreover, for the low-cost batteries, recycling of the batteries becomes economically unattractive, so legal stipulations become important. However, in general, it must be still secured that closing the material cycle for all battery types with suitable processes is achieved to secure the supply of raw materials and also to further advance new developments.

materials science, multidisciplinary,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
A qualitative assessment of lithium ion battery recycling processes

Roberto Sommerville,Pengcheng Zhu,Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar,Oliver Heidrich,Vannessa Goodship,Emma Kendrick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105219

2021-02-01

Abstract:<p>With the widespread adoption of e-mobility, there are high numbers of lithium Ion batteries (LIB) entering the waste stream. It is imperative that disposal and recycling strategies are developed and implemented. There is an urgent need for safe, environmentally friendly and economically affordable disposal routes for End of Life (EoL) LIBs. This study has looked at 44 commercial recyclers and assessed their recycling and reclamation processes. A novel qualitative assessment matrix termed "Strategic materials Weighting And Value Evaluation" (SWAVE) is proposed and used to compare the strategic importance and value of various materials in EoL LIBs. The sustainability and quality of recycled material are assessed by comparing the final form or composition after the recycling processes, the industrial processes and the industry type (primary sector, manufacturer or recycler). SWAVE is applied to each company, producing a score out of 20, with a higher number indicating that more materials can be recycled. The separation processes and resources from six of the prominent recycling companies are discussed further. The majority of recyclers use one or more of mechanical treatment, pyrometallurgy, or hydrometallurgy, concentrating upon high value metal extraction rather than closed-loop recycling of the metals or component materials, highlighting an environmental and technological gap. To improve the current circular economy of batteries reuse and repurposing of materials (closed-loop recycling), instead of purely recycling or recovery of metals should be considered for further development. Further studies of environmental trade-offs from recycling or recovering one material in preference to another is required.</p>
A closer look at lithium-ion batteries in E-waste and the potential for a universal hydrometallurgical recycling process

Johannes J. M. M. van de Ven,Yongxiang Yang,Shoshan T. Abrahami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67507-7

IF: 4.6

2024-07-21

Scientific Reports

Abstract:The demand for lithium-ion batteries (LiBs) is rising, resulting in a growing need to recycle the critical raw materials (CRMs) which they contain. Typically, all spent LiBs from consumer electronics end up in a single waste stream that is processed to produce black mass (BM) for further recovery. It is desired to design a recycling process that can deal with a mixture of LiBs. Hence, this study investigates the structure and composition of battery modules in common appliances such as laptops, power banks, smart watches, wireless earphones and mobile phones. The battery cells in the module were disassembled into cell casing, cathode, anode and separator. Then, the cathode active materials (CAMs) were characterized in detail with XRD-, SEM-, EDX- and ICP-OES-analysis. No direct link was found between the chemistry of the active materials (NMC, LCO, LMO, LFP etc.) and the application. Various BM samples were submitted to a leaching procedure (2 M H 2 SO 4 , 50 °C, 2 h, 60 g BM/L) with varying concentration (0–4 vol%) of H 2 O 2 to study the influence of their chemical composition on the dissolution of Li, Ni, Mn and Co. Only a part of the BMs dissolved completely at 4 vol% H 2 O 2 , which was attributed to the oxidation state of the transition metals (TMs). Exact determination of H 2 O 2 consumption by redox titration confirmed this hypothesis.

multidisciplinary sciences
Productive syntax abilities in Huntington's and Parkinson's diseases

L. Murray,Lisa P. Lenz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(01)80069-5

IF: 2.682

2001-06-01

Brain and Cognition

Abstract:
Spent Rechargeable Lithium Batteries in E-Waste: Composition and Its Implications

Xianlai Zeng,Jinhui Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0705-6

2014-01-01

Abstract:The amount of spent rechargeable lithium batteries (RLBs) is growing rapidly owing to wide application of these batteries in portable electronic devices and electric vehicles, which obliges that spent RLBs should be handled properly. Identification of spent RLBs can supply fundamental information for spent RLBs recycling. This study aimed to determine the differences of physical components and chemical compositions among various spent RLBs. All the samplings of RLBs were rigorously dismantled and measured by an inductive coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer. The results indicate that the average of total weight of the separator, the anode and the cathode accounted for over 60% of all the RLBs. The weight ratio of valuable metals ranged from 26% to 76%, and approximately 20% of total weight was Cu and Al. Moreover, no significant differences were found among different manufacturers, applications, and electrolyte types. And regarding portable electronic devices, there is also no significant difference in the Co-Li concentration ratios in the leaching liquid of RLBs.
Barriers and framework conditions for the market entry of second-life lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles

Stefanie Prenner,Florian Part,Sabine Jung-Waclik,Arnaud Bordes,Robert Leonhardt,Aleksander Jandric,Anita Schmidt,Marion Huber-Humer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37423

IF: 3.776

2024-09-07

Heliyon

Abstract:Transition to circular economy for lithium-ion batteries used in electric vehicles requires integrating multiple stages of the value cycle. However, strategies aimed at extending the lifetime of batteries are not yet sufficiently considered within the European battery industry, particularly regarding repurposing. Using second-life lithium-ion batteries (SLBs) before subsequent recycling can offer several advantages, such as the development of sustainable business models, the reduction of emissions, and alignment with UN Sustainable Development Goals 7, 12, and 13. Using expert and problem-centred interviews along with an exploratory workshop, this study guides stakeholders in the battery sector by illustrating the necessary changes for a more holistic circular economy. Moreover, an extended political, economic, social, technological, environmental, legal, and additionally safety-related (PESSTEL) analysis approach is carried out, which has not yet been used in this context. In this process, barriers, as well as necessary institutional framework conditions and organisational requirements for a successful market entry of SLB applications are investigated. Among others, key barriers relate to the competition with first-life applications and safety concerns. SLBs require high manual labour costs for repurposing, along with expenses for expired warranties and re-certifications. Ownership structures in traditional business models often result in SLBs and their corresponding usage data staying under the control of the manufacturers. Market viability, however, requires a level playing field for both first-life and second-life operators as well as circular battery and data-sharing business models. Gathering data on the ageing performance and performing improved safety testing according to test protocols facilitates the reliable assessment of SLBs.
Life cycle assessment of recycling options for automotive Li-ion battery packs

Evangelos Kallitsis,Anna Korre,Geoff H. Kelsall

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133636

IF: 11.1

2022-08-29

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:Ramping up automotive lithium-ion battery (LIB) production volumes creates an imperative need for the establishment of end-of-life treatment chains for spent automotive traction battery packs. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an essential tool in evaluating the environmental performance of such chains and options. This work synthesises publicly-available data to expand upon previously reported LCA studies for LIB recycling and holistically model end-of-life treatment chains for spent automotive traction battery packs with lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide positive electrodes. The study provides an in-depth analysis of unit process contributions to the environmental benefits and burdens of battery recycling options and integrates these with the battery production impacts to estimate the net environmental benefit achieved by the introduction of recycling in the value chain. The attributional LCA model accounts for the whole recycling chain, from the point of end-of-life LIB collection to the provision of secondary materials for battery manufacturing. Pyrometallurgical processing of spent automotive traction battery cells is predicted to have a larger Global Warming Potential (GWP), due to its higher energy intensity, while hydrometallurgical processing is shown to be more environmentally beneficial, due to the additional recovery of lithium as hydroxide. The majority of the environmental benefits arise from the recovery of aluminium and copper fractions of battery packs, with important contributions also arising from the recovery of nickel and cobalt from the battery cells. Overall, the LCA model presented estimates a net benefit in 11 out of 13 environmental impact categories based on the ReCiPe characterisation method, as compared to battery production without recycling. An investigation of the effect of geographic specificity on the combined production and recycling indicates that it is as a key source of GWP impact variability and that the more climate burdening chains offer a significantly higher potential for GWP reductions through battery recycling. The sensitivity analysis carried out shows that impacts related to air quality are higher when recovering lower grade materials. This study provides a quantitative and replicable inventory model which highlights the significance of the environmental benefits achieved through the establishment of circular automotive battery value chains.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
Recycling of Lithium‐Ion Batteries—Current State of the Art, Circular Economy, and Next Generation Recycling

Jonas Neumann,Martina Petranikova,Marcel Meeus,Jorge D. Gamarra,Reza Younesi,Martin Winter,Sascha Nowak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202102917

IF: 27.8

2022-01-10

Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract:Being successfully introduced into the market only 30 years ago, lithium‐ion batteries have become state‐of‐the‐art power sources for portable electronic devices and the most promising candidate for energy storage in stationary or electric vehicle applications. This widespread use in a multitude of industrial and private applications leads to the need for recycling and reutilization of their constituent components. Improving the “recycling technology” of lithium ion batteries is a continuous effort and recycling is far from maturity today. The complexity of lithium ion batteries with varying active and inactive material chemistries interferes with the desire to establish one robust recycling procedure for all kinds of lithium ion batteries. Therefore, the current state of the art needs to be analyzed, improved, and adapted for the coming cell chemistries and components. This paper provides an overview of regulations and new battery directive demands. It covers current practices in material collection, sorting, transportation, handling, and recycling. Future generations of batteries will further increase the diversity of cell chemistry and components. Therefore, this paper presents predictions related to the challenges of future battery recycling with regard to battery materials and chemical composition, and discusses future approaches to battery recycling. Future generations of batteries will further increase the diversity of cell chemistry and components. Therefore, this paper presents predictions related to the challenges of future battery recycling with regard to battery materials and chemical composition, and discusses future approaches to battery recycling.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,energy & fuels
The assessment of pollutant waste generated by battery and its effect on the environment: a concise review

Ambrish Singh,Kashif R. Ansari,Ismat H. Ali,Abdullah K. Alanazi,Muhammad Younas,Aeshah H. Alamri,Yuanhua Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zpch-2023-0388

2024-02-21

Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie

Abstract:With annualized expansion rates close to 8 % in 2018 and a projected range of 18–30 % by 2030, wasted batteries are a continual economic and ecological concern due to the growing use of electronic gadgets. The improper preservation and handling of waste discharges are not regulated, which allows for their accumulation in public areas and the release of dangerous materials into the ecosystem at the landfill. To improve the energy properties and lifespan of batteries, current advancements in battery manufacturing mandate the application of novel materials for electrolytes and nanomaterials for cathode materials. Novel battery chemicals may further complicate recycling and containment efforts because it still needs to be determined how much of an influence they will have on the ecosystem. Only a few nations can now recycle mass-manufactured lithium batteries, making up barely 5 % of the more than 345,000 tonnes of garbage produced worldwide in 2018. To provide evidence for policy and legislation, this concise review intends to incorporate current describe and emergent battery pollutant, their adverse ecological aftermath, and ongoing diagnostic techniques.

chemistry, physical
Material and energy flow analysis for environmental and economic impact assessment of industrial recycling routes for lithium-ion traction batteries

Steffen Blömeke,Christian Scheller,Felipe Cerdas,Christian Thies,Rolf Hachenberger,Mark Gonter,Christoph Herrmann,Thomas S. Spengler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134344

IF: 11.1

2022-12-01

Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract:Electric vehicles powered with renewable energy are considered a key technology to decarbonize the mobility sector. However, the currently used lithium-ion batteries contain environmentally harmful, scarce, and expensive materials. The recycling of spent traction batteries could mitigate the environmental impact of electric mobility by substituting primary raw materials with recovered secondary materials. Moreover, it would counter the issues related to resource scarcity and expensive materials. Therefore, the automotive industry needs to establish effective processes for taking back and recycling of batteries. While many studies have analyzed the environmental and economic impacts of lithium-ion battery recycling, the lack of transparency of the energy and material flows as well as the missing comparability between different recycling routes contradicts an in-depth life cycle engineering. Therefore, this paper aims to provide transparent material and energy flow analysis on process unit level based on physical and chemical relationships and use this to assess the environmental and economic impacts of three widely used recycling routes. The analysis focuses on pyrometallurgical, mechanical, and thermal-mechanical pretreatment, and subsequent hydrometallurgical material recovery. Furthermore, we assess the environmental and economic impacts of each recycling route. The results indicate that mechanical recycling has the highest economic benefit and avoids most environmental impacts especially due to graphite and lithium recovery. A thermal-mechanical pretreatment has environmental benefits but results in lower profit. The pyrometallurgical pretreatment results in large amounts of slag, for which the hydrometallurgical processing reduces the avoided environmental impacts significantly. The assessment results support transparent decision-making regarding the implementation and further engineering of recycling infrastructure.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
[Method of studying renal morphology in hypertensive patients with and without renal artery stenosis].

C. Mounier-Vehier,O. Jaboureck,P. Devos,C. Lions,Serge Willoteaux,A. Carré,J. Beregi

2001-08-01

Abstract:UNLABELLED Although the size of the kidney is still the most commonly used as morphological parameter, it is not enough sensitive for early detection of ischemic nephropathy. PURPOSE To study a novel method of renal morphology analysis using spiral computed tomography angiography (CTA) in hypertensive patients with or without unilateral atheromatous renal artery stenosis (RAS). METHODS Forty-nine hypertensive patients suspected RAS underwent spiral CTA. Arteriography showed significant RAS in 26 patients. Renal length, 3 upper and 3 lower cortical thicknesses were measured in 46 control kidneys (C) i.e. 23 patients without RAS (group 1), in 26 stenosed (S) and in 26 opposite kidneys (OPP) i.e. 26 patients with unilateral RAS (group 2). Mean cortical thickness (MCT), cortical area (CA), medullary length (ML) were calculated in the same groups. The reproducibility and agreement of measurements were investigated in two groups. The demographic parameters (age, sex, bodymass index, and history of hypertension) were correlated with morphological parameters in group 1. RESULTS The reproducibility and agreement of measurements were confirmed (R2 = 0.53 to 0.93) except for anterosuperior thickness. The C kidneys were of comparable morphology: MCT (mm) = 9.1 +/- 0.6; 9.2 +/- 1.0, CA (mm2) = 950 +/- 119; 934 +/- 157, ML (mm) = 85 +/- 11. In group of Opp kidneys, MCT = 7.9 +/- 1.4 mm, CA = 806 +/- 210 mm2, ML = 84 +/- 13 mm. In group of S kidneys, MCT = 6.6 +/- 1.6 mm, CA = 612 +/- 193 mm2, ML = 77 +/- 14 mm. Demographic parameters were not correlated to renal morphology. CONCLUSION Spiral CTA is a suitable method to study renal morphology. Cortical thickness and medullary length could be used to obtain a reliable diagnosis of early ischemic nephropathy.
Towards Sustainable Battery Recycling: A Carbon Footprint Comparison between Pyrometallurgical and Hydrometallurgical Battery Recycling Flowsheets

Gert Van Hoof,Bénédicte Robertz,Bart Verrecht

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met13121915

IF: 2.695

2023-11-21

Metals

Abstract:The expected large growth in electric mobility presents challenges, such as requiring a very large amount of critical raw materials like nickel, cobalt, and lithium. Due to this expected growth significant amounts of production scrap from cell and battery manufacturing will be generated. Over the next decade, increasingly larger amounts of Li-ion batteries from electric vehicles will also reach their end-of-life. Hence, in order to close the loop, the development and industrialization of sustainable battery recycling flowsheets are key so that both production scrap and end-of-life batteries can be recycled back to their ‘battery grade’ building blocks. Battery recycling flowsheets are typically categorized into two categories: (1) ‘Pyro-Hydro’, a combination of battery smelting in a pyrometallurgical process, followed by the further refining of the alloy via hydrometallurgy; and (2) ‘(Thermo)mechanical-Hydro’, a combination of (thermo)mechanical pretreatment and further hydrometallurgical refining of the resulting black mass. In this paper, a carbon footprint analysis is presented comparing these two battery recycling approaches: ‘Pyro-Hydro’ and ‘Thermomechanical-Hydro’, taking into account the impact of the latest evolutions in process technology and efficiency. To facilitate this comparison, a prospective LCA was carried out for the respective flowsheets. The quantitative analysis shows that ‘Pyro-Hydro’ leads to the lowest overall carbon footprint but also that both ‘Pyro-Hydro’ and ‘Thermomechanical-Hydro’ flowsheets have their challenges and opportunities for decarbonization. The inclusion of the fate of side streams such as graphite and electrolyte in the analysis is shown to be critically important in order to gain an objective and complete view.

materials science, multidisciplinary,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
Life cycle assessment of solar home system informal waste management practices in Malawi

Christopher Kinally,Fernando Antonanzas-Torres,Frank Podd,Alejandro Gallego-Schmid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123190

IF: 11.2

2024-04-19

Applied Energy

Abstract:This study performs the first life cycle assessment of solar home systems (SHSs) to use data quantifying lead pollution from informal lead-acid battery recycling. The typical life cycle of SHSs in off-grid communities surrounding Malawi's capital of Lilongwe is assessed, considering affordable components imported from China, lead-acid battery lifetimes of one year, the collection of materials through the informal scrap market, the open dumping and burning of waste, and informal lead-acid battery recycling (remanufacturing). Lead-acid batteries are highlighted as the most damaging SHS component, occupying 54–99% of each impact category, caused by the burdens of lead mining and the high assembly energy of batteries, amplified by short battery lifetimes – subject to detrimental user practices. The amount of electricity delivered to users is significantly restricted by the low efficiency of affordable SHS components. Meanwhile, the informal remanufacturing of a single lead-acid battery is recorded to release over 100 times the lethal oral dose of lead for an adult into densely populated communities, resulting in a terrestrial ecotoxicity potential of 200–386 kg 1,4-DCB eq. per kWh delivered. Proposed formal recycling solutions are found to successfully mitigate the toxicity of informal waste management but incur significant burdens: substituting toxic but resource-efficient informal remanufacture with safe but energy-intensive formal battery production. Furthermore, the short one-year lifetimes of lead-acid batteries can cause the environmental impacts of SHS to exceed the impacts of diesel generators in most impact categories, resulting in a global warming potential of up to 1.4 kg CO 2 /kWh. Hence, both extended battery lifetimes of three years and formal recycling are found to be necessary for SHSs to be considered as a safe and low-carbon technology – requiring holistic interventions.

energy & fuels,engineering, chemical

Operational Analysis of Stochastic Closed Queueing Networks

The fire risk of portable batteries in their end-of-life: Investigation of the state of charge of waste lithium-ion batteries in Austria

The Recycling of End-of-Life Lithium-Ion Batteries and the Phase Characterisation of Black Mass

Recycling Strategies for Spent Consumer Lithium-Ion Batteries

Economic and environmental characterization of an evolving Li-ion battery waste stream

Material Flow Analysis of Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling in Europe: Environmental and Economic Implications

Ecological Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles with Focus on Mechanical Processes

Biodegradable plastics – Where to throw? A life cycle assessment of waste collection and management pathways in Austria

Challenges in Ecofriendly Battery Recycling and Closed Material Cycles: A Perspective on Future Lithium Battery Generations

A qualitative assessment of lithium ion battery recycling processes

A closer look at lithium-ion batteries in E-waste and the potential for a universal hydrometallurgical recycling process

Productive syntax abilities in Huntington's and Parkinson's diseases

Spent Rechargeable Lithium Batteries in E-Waste: Composition and Its Implications

Barriers and framework conditions for the market entry of second-life lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles

Life cycle assessment of recycling options for automotive Li-ion battery packs

Recycling of Lithium‐Ion Batteries—Current State of the Art, Circular Economy, and Next Generation Recycling

The assessment of pollutant waste generated by battery and its effect on the environment: a concise review

Material and energy flow analysis for environmental and economic impact assessment of industrial recycling routes for lithium-ion traction batteries

[Method of studying renal morphology in hypertensive patients with and without renal artery stenosis].

Towards Sustainable Battery Recycling: A Carbon Footprint Comparison between Pyrometallurgical and Hydrometallurgical Battery Recycling Flowsheets

Life cycle assessment of solar home system informal waste management practices in Malawi