Difference in driver gene expression patterns between perihilar and peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in an experimental mouse model

Toshiyuki Adachi,Tomohiko Adachi,Takehiro Nakagaki,Shinichiro Ono,Masaaki Hidaka,Shinichiro Ito,Kengo Kanetaka,Mitsuhisa Takatsuki,Noriyuki Nishida,Susumu Eguchi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.772

Abstract:Background: The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is based on tumor localization; however, the mechanism remains unknown. Therefore, we investigated the biological characteristics of perihilar and peripheral ICC in a mouse model. Methods: The model was established by the administration of three oncogenic plasmids harboring myristoylated AKT, mutated human YAP, and pCMV-Sleeping Beauty into the mice. The perihilar and peripheral ICC tumors that developed in the same mouse were assessed for the expression of cell adhesion factors and driver genes with immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: The perihilar ICC tumors were irregularly shaped, whereas the peripheral tumors were mostly circular, similar to the differences found in patients. Alpha-smooth muscle actin was strongly expressed in the perihilar tumors at 10 weeks, and vimentin expression was significantly up-regulated in the perihilar ICC at 14 weeks. Fgfr2 level significantly increased in peripheral ICC at 10 weeks, whereas Idh2 expression was up-regulated in perihilar ICC. Conclusions: Despite diffuse injection of oncogenic plasmid, expression of driver genes and oncogenes in ICC tumor cells differs depending on the tumor localization, resulting in changes in epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which may explain the different outcomes of patients with peripheral and perihilar ICC.