Improving immunization coverage rates: an evidence-based review of the literature.

A. Shefer,P. Briss,L. Rodewald,R. Bernier,R. Strikas,H. Yusuf,S. Ndiaye,S. Wiliams,M. Pappaioanou,A. Hinman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.EPIREV.A017992
Epidemiologic Reviews
Abstract:PURPOSE This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of population-based interventions to improve vaccination coverage. The paper 1) presents a framework for evaluating interventions to improve vaccination coverage, 2) describes selected strategies for improving coverage, and 3) systematically reviews available information on the effectiveness of these strategies in improving vaccination coverage and other outcomes to assess their effectiveness. for all antigens studied. Patient reminders appear to work whether as a telephone contact, letter, or postcard. Two studies (67, 88) directly compared mailed reminders with telephone reminders and did not find a difference in effectiveness between these strategies. Six studies evaluated intensity of reminders (e.g., general to more specific, generic to personalized and signed by physician) (71, 72, 82, 111, 112); five of the six studies found greater increases in coverage with more intensive reminders. Patient reminders have not been studied specifically in adolescents.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?