Abstract:Medical Decision Making, Ahead of Print. ObjectivesUtility scores associated with preference-based health-related quality-of-life instruments such as the EQ-5D-3L are reported as point estimates. In this study, we develop methods for capturing the uncertainty associated with the valuation study of the UK EQ-5D-3L that arises from the variability inherent in the underlying data, which is tacitly ignored by point estimates. We derive a new tariff that properly accounts for this and assigns a specific closed-form distribution to the utility of each of the 243 health states of the EQ-5D-3L.MethodsUsing the UK EQ-5D-3L valuation study, we used a Bayesian approach to obtain the posterior distributions of the derived utility scores. We constructed a hierarchical model that accounts for model misspecification and the responses of the survey participants to obtain Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples from the posteriors. The posterior distributions were approximated by mixtures of normal distributions under the Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence as the criterion for the assessment of the approximation. We considered the Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) algorithm to estimate the parameters of the mixture distributions.ResultsWe derived an MCMC sample of total size 4,000 × 243. No evidence of nonconvergence was found. Our model was robust to changes in priors and starting values. The posterior utility distributions of the EQ-5D-3L states were summarized as 3-component mixtures of normal distributions, and the corresponding KL divergence values were low.ConclusionsOur method accounts for layers of uncertainty in valuation studies, which are otherwise ignored. Our techniques can be applied to other instruments and countries' populations.HighlightsGuidelines for health technology assessments typically require that uncertainty be accounted for in economic evaluations, but the parameter uncertainty of the regression model used in the valuation study of the health instrument is often tacitly ignored.We consider the UK valuation study of the EQ-5D-3L and construct a Bayesian model that accounts for layers of uncertainty that would otherwise be disregarded, and we derive closed-form utility distributions.The derived tariff can be used by researchers in economic evaluations, as it allows analysts to directly sample a utility value from its corresponding distribution, which reflects the associated uncertainty of the utility score.

Demystifying the Persistent Ambiguity of GIS as ‘Tool’ versus ‘Science’

Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information in Practice: Considerations from Three Case Studies

Calculating the Expected Value of Sample Information Using Efficient Nested Monte Carlo: A Tutorial

Estimating the Expected Value of Sample Information across Different Sample Sizes using Moment Matching and Non-Linear Regression

Efficient Estimation of the Value of Information in Monte Carlo Models

Estimating the EVSI with Gaussian Approximations and Spline-Based Series Methods

Expected value of sample information calculations for risk prediction model development

A Review of Methods for Analysis of the Expected Value of Information

The expected value of sample information calculations for external validation of risk prediction models

A Review of Methods for the Analysis of the Expected Value of Information

Risk aversion and uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis: the expected-utility, moment-generating function approach

Calculating the Expected Net Benefit of Sampling for Survival Data: A Tutorial and Case Study

Uncertainty and Value of Information in Risk Prediction Modeling

Microsimulation Estimates of Decision Uncertainty and Value of Information Are Biased but Consistent

A simulation study to compare methods for constructing confidence intervals for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

Unbiased Monte Carlo estimation for the expected value of partial perfect information

A stochastic framework for estimation of summary measures in cost-effectiveness analyses.

Capturing Valuation Study Sampling Uncertainty in the Estimation of Health State Utility Values Using the EQ-5D-3L

Malakoplakia in a cadaver renal allograft: a case study.

Uncertain about uncertainty in matching‐adjusted indirect comparisons? A simulation study to compare methods for variance estimation

Automated Efficient Estimation using Monte Carlo Efficient Influence Functions