The impact of insider managerial ownership on corporate performance of Taiwanese tourist hotels
Ming-Hsiang Chen,Chun-Ling Hou,Seoki Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.05.005
IF: 10.427
2012-06-01
International Journal of Hospitality Management
Abstract:This study examines the impact of insider managerial ownership on financial performance of publicly traded tourist hotels in Taiwan. Insider managerial shareholding (<i>IMS</i>) includes two different classes of owners: managers and directors (i.e., managers' shareholding [<i>MAS</i>] plus directors' shareholding [<i>DIRS</i>]). The indicators of financial performance under consideration are return on assets (<i>ROA</i>), return on equity (<i>ROE</i>), stock return (<i>SR</i>), and Tobin's Q. In addition to analyzing total insider managerial ownership (<i>IMS</i>), the study splits <i>IMS</i> into two components (<i>MAS</i> and <i>DIRS</i>) and examines each of them, separately. Subsequently, panel regression tests examine the effects of <i>IMS</i>, <i>MAS</i>, and <i>DIRS</i> on financial performance of Taiwanese tourist hotels. Test results suggest that <i>IMS</i> explains <i>ROA</i>, <i>ROE</i> and <i>Tobin's Q</i>, but not <i>SR</i>. Further, compared to <i>MAS</i>, <i>DIRS</i> has a more significant impact on hotel performance. Specifically, an inverted U-shape represents the effects of <i>IMS</i> and <i>DIRS</i> on hotel performance (<i>ROA</i>, <i>ROE</i> and <i>Tobin's Q</i>), indicating that both <i>IMS</i> and <i>DIRS</i> have a significantly positive impact on hotel performance up to an optimal point (supporting the convergence-of-interests hypothesis). Further, when <i>IMS</i> and <i>DIRS</i> are greater than their corresponding optimal points, these two factors can significantly deteriorate hotel performance (supporting the entrenchment hypothesis).
hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism