Abstract:Introduction Several authors have demonstrated the relevance of the therapist sensitivity to the affective expression of his client (Merten & Schwab, 2005; 150-158), as well as to his own emotional experience (Haynal-Raymond et al., 2005;142-148) in order to build a more effective therapeutic relationship, and results. An important source of information to decode the emotional expression hints is the face, and its expression (Ekman & Friesen, 1975; Russel & Fernández-Dolls, 1997;275-294). Despite common sense saying that context is relevant to understand the meaning of the emotional facial expression, the literature review shows inconsistent results. Objectives The main goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of clinical context over the perception of the emotional facial expression. Methods This study followed a within-subjects design, and its sample consisted of 60 clinical psychologists. 21 combinations of prototypical expression images with mixed emotional signals, and clinical information texts were presented to the participants. Then their judgement on the type of emotion displayed was requested. The presentation of the text-image pairs was randomized between three conditions: consistent, and non-consistent, and neutral. Results The results suggest that emotions are more easily recognized in the presence of a concordant context than a non-concordant or neutral one, and that the greater the similarity between the facial expression of the image presented and the face prototypically associated with the context, the greater the influence of the context. However, In the recognition of mixed emotional signs, there was greater recognition of signs of anger in the facial expression, as a non-dominant emotion, when in the presence of the neutral story than of the story that agreed with the dominant emotion (sadness). There was also greater recognition of sadness, as a non-dominant emotion, in the presence of a story in agreement with fear than in the presence of a neutral story. There was also a statistically significant increase in the attribution of anger to images in which it is not present and whose dominant emotion is fear, when associated with a context of aggression vs. a neutral context. It was also found that there was a significant decrease in the attribution of fear to the sadness-anger image (25%-75%) in the presence of the aggression context compared to the neutral and panic contexts.There was also a statistically significant decrease in the attribution of sadness to an image of fear in the neutral context compared to the other contexts (panic and aggression). Conclusions In conclusion, our study have shown an impact of context over overvaluation or the undervaluation of the emotional facial expression as well as either with prototypical expressions or the mixed emotional signals when referring to sadness, fear, and anger. Thus, mental health clinicians should consider the influence of these contexts. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Contextual information resolves uncertainty about ambiguous facial emotions: Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates

Reversing Threat to Safety: Incongruence of Facial Emotions and Instructed Threat Modulates Conscious Perception but Not Physiological Responding

Context matters: task relevance shapes neural responses to emotional facial expressions

Early integration of affectively contextual information when processing low-intensity fearful faces: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

Emotional Context Effects on the Rating of Ambiguous Facial Expressions in Depression and Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

Individual differences in the evaluation of ambiguous visual and auditory threat‐related expressions

How Context Influences Our Perception of Emotional Faces: A Behavioral Study on the Kuleshov Effect

The impact of clinical context on the recognition of facial expressions

The influence of contextual uncertainty on facial expression processing: Evidence from behavior and ERPs

Social interaction context shapes emotion recognition through body language, not facial expressions.

Stria terminalis, amygdala, and temporoparietal junction networks facilitate efficient emotion processing under expectations

Two different faces of threat. Comparing the neural systems for recognizing fear and anger in dynamic body expressions

Early Influence of Emotional Scenes on the Encoding of Fearful Expressions with Different Intensities: an Event-Related Potential Study

Emotion depends on context, culture and their interaction: evidence from effective connectivity

When emotions run high: A critical role for context in the unfolding of dynamic, real-life facial affect.

Close facial emotions enhance physiological responses and facilitate perceptual discrimination

Stimulus-driven and strategic neural responses to fearful and happy facial expressions in humans

Unattended emotional faces elicit early lateralized amygdala-frontal and fusiform activations

The Recognition of Cross-Cultural Emotional Faces Is Affected by Intensity and Ethnicity in a Japanese Sample

Transient emotional events and individual affective traits affect emotion recognition in a perceptual decision-making task

Threatening Facial Expressions Impact Goal-Directed Actions Only if Task-Relevant