Tooth-Bone-Borne vs Bone-Borne Rapid Maxillary Expanders on Dentoskeletal Changes
Javier Echarri-Nicolás,María José González-Olmo,Pablo Echarri-Lobiondo,Manuel Lagravère,Martin Romero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s433693
2024-04-30
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Abstract:Javier Echarri-Nicolás, 1 María José González-Olmo, 2 Pablo Echarri-Lobiondo, 3 Manuel Lagravère, 4 Martin Romero 2 1 Doctoral Program in Health Sciences, International PhD School, Rey Juan Carlos University (URJC), Móstoles, Madrid, Spain; 2 Department of Orthodontics, University Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain; 3 Athenea Dental Institute, San Jorge University, Zaragoza, Spain; 4 Division of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Correspondence: María José González-Olmo, Department of Orthodontics, University Rey Juan Carlos, Avda de Atenas s/n 28922, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain, Email Purpose: This study compared the insertion and thickness of the cortical bone, the parallelism of the midpalatal suture, and the skeletal transverse dimension using a microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) with those produced by bone-anchored maxillary expander (BAME) in adults. Patients and Methods: The sample comprised 18 patients (mean age, 29.9± 9.4 years) selected for the MARPE group and 18 (mean age 24.8± 6.8 years) selected for the BAME group. Cone-Beam computed tomography scans taken just before and after the expansion. Results: After treatment, there was a significant palatal depth decrease. In addition, maxillary and mandibular width were increased in both groups. Regarding the cortical bone insertion and cortical bone width, it is shown an increase in both groups but those changes are not significant. However, the anterior suture opening effect occurs more frequently in the BAME than in the MARPE device. There are no differences in the frequency of opening of the midpalatal suture in the cases treated with MARPE and BAME, in both cases the most frequent opening morphology is parallel, independently of midpalatal suture maturation. Conclusion: There are no differences in the use of MARPE or BAME in the parallelism of the middle palatal suture, the cortical bone insertion, and thickness according to the maturation stages of the midpalatal suture but significantly increases the transverse dimensions of the maxillary skeleton. Keywords: 3D-scanner, CT, microimplant, expansion The microimplant-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) technique was described by Dr Won Moon in 2013 and consists of a tooth-bone-borne appliance with a retention using four bicortical microscrews from the palatal cortical bone to the nasal floor. 1 The microscrews are inserted into the posterior area of the palate, regardless of the age or sex of the patient. Its advantage is that it reduces the load applied by the appliance to the vestibular periodontal ligament of the anchoring teeth. In 2013, the bone-anchored maxillary expansion (BAME) concept described by Winsauer et al 2 was introduced. It is an expansion screw attached to four or six microimplants in the palatal area without tooth support. Complications with microscrew-assisted separators tend to arise when orthopedic forces are applied in the vicinity of the maxillary, frontal maxillary, and frontal zygomatic-maxillary buttresses in patients who have already completed midpalatal suture ossification. Various investigations have been carried out to compare the results in the airway, 3 periodontal, dentoalveolar, and skeletal changes. 4–7 Other authors have also been compared to tooth-supported and BAME expanders; three-dimensional dental and skeletal changes, 8–11 and periodontal effects. 12 The effects of MARPE and BAME devices on patients previously treated with Surgical Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion (SARPE) have also been compared. 7,13 Only Canan and Senisik, 14 Moon et al 15 and Bazzani et al 16 have compared MARPE and BAME therapies. Although these investigations have compared the therapeutic effects of MARPE and BAME on tooth expansion, labiolingual angulation changes, 14,15 and skeletal expansion, 15,16 there are still no articles that link the maxillary and mandibular skeletal expansion, palatal depth, and the morphology of the midpalatal suture after expansion in adults treated with MARPE and BAME, taking into account the ossification stage 17 of the midpalatal suture and measured with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) techniques. In this context, this article has two main objectives: The primary objective is to compare the insertion (described as the distance between the buccal cortical bone and the cementoenamel junction) and thickness (described as the distance from the furca of the upper first molar to the most external point of the labial cortical bone) of the cortical bone of the upper first molar -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services